Longitudinal national-level monitoring of on-farm broiler welfare identifies consistently poorly performing farms.


Journal

Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 06 2021
Historique:
received: 18 09 2020
accepted: 19 05 2021
entrez: 8 6 2021
pubmed: 9 6 2021
medline: 9 6 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

A range of welfare outcome measures relating to on-farm welfare are monitored in UK slaughterhouses to check compliance with the European Broiler Directive. A national dataset from 438,155 batches of chickens between 2010 and 2014 and from 228,795 batches between 2016 and 2018 was analysed. The data contained information about 3.1 billion chickens. The highest mean proportion for a single condition was for ascites/oedema in 2016-2018 at 0.384%, affecting 3.9 million chickens/year sent to slaughter during that time, followed by abnormal colour/fevered at 0.324%, affecting 3.4 million chickens/year. Identifying farms most likely to have poor welfare is an important strategy for improving animal welfare overall, and for maximising the capacity for checking regulatory compliance when resources are limited. We found a greater proportion of broiler farms overall remained consistently in the best quartile (16.4%) rather than the worst quartile (6.6%). Farms that exceeded a Government 'trigger' threshold for poor welfare were significantly more likely to subsequently improve than 'non-trigger' farms, although they usually remained in the worst performing quartile of farms.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34099782
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-91347-4
pii: 10.1038/s41598-021-91347-4
pmc: PMC8185078
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

11928

Références

Br Poult Sci. 1998 Jul;39(3):318-24
pubmed: 9693810
Poult Sci. 2020 Nov;99(11):5222-5232
pubmed: 33142438
Avian Pathol. 2008 Apr;37(2):117-26
pubmed: 18393088
Prev Vet Med. 2020 Aug;181:105036
pubmed: 32505027
Animals (Basel). 2018 May 08;8(5):
pubmed: 29738491
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 6;15(4):e0231006
pubmed: 32251460
Poult Sci. 2017 Jul 1;96(7):2018-2028
pubmed: 28204752
Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 16;10(1):15151
pubmed: 32938994
Ir Vet J. 2011 Oct 07;64:13
pubmed: 21982340
Br Poult Sci. 2006 Oct;47(5):529-32
pubmed: 17050095
Animal. 2020 Jan;14(1):119-128
pubmed: 31311613
R Soc Open Sci. 2016 Sep 7;3(9):160197
pubmed: 27703686
Animal. 2016 Feb;10(2):302-8
pubmed: 26278785

Auteurs

Siobhan Mullan (S)

Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Langford, Avon, Bristol, BS40 5DU, UK. Siobhan.mullan@ucd.ie.

Bobby Stuijfzand (B)

Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Langford, Avon, Bristol, BS40 5DU, UK.

Andrew Butterworth (A)

Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Langford, Avon, Bristol, BS40 5DU, UK.

Classifications MeSH