Central nervous system stimulation therapies in phantom limb pain: a systematic review of clinical trials.
central nervous system stimulation
neuromodulation
neuropathic pain
phantom limb pain
systematic review
Journal
Neural regeneration research
ISSN: 1673-5374
Titre abrégé: Neural Regen Res
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101316351
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2022
Jan 2022
Historique:
entrez:
8
6
2021
pubmed:
9
6
2021
medline:
9
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Phantom limb pain is a chronic pain syndrome that is difficult to cope with. Despite neurostimulation treatment is indicated for refractory neuropathic pain, there is scant evidence from randomized controlled trials to recommend it as the treatment choice. Thus, a systematic review was performed to analyze the efficacy of central nervous system stimulation therapies as a strategy for pain management in patients with phantom limb pain. A literature search for studies conducted between 1970 and September 2020 was carried out using the MEDLINE and Embase databases. Principles of The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline were followed. There were a total of 10 full-text articles retrieved and included in this review. Deep brain stimulation, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation, and motor cortex stimulation were the treatment strategies used in the selected clinical trials. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation were effective therapies to reduce pain perception, as well as to relieve anxiety and depression symptoms in phantom limb pain patients. Conversely, invasive approaches were considered the last treatment option as evidence in deep brain stimulation and motor cortex stimulation suggests that the value of phantom limb pain treatment remains controversial. However, the findings on use of these treatment strategies in other forms of neuropathic pain suggest that these invasive approaches could be a potential option for phantom limb pain patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34100428
pii: NeuralRegenRes_2022_17_1_59_314288
doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.314288
pmc: PMC8451556
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
59-64Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
None
Références
J Pain Res. 2012;5:39-49
pubmed: 22457600
Ann Neurol. 2019 Jan;85(1):59-73
pubmed: 30383312
Cortex. 2018 Sep;106:174-184
pubmed: 30005369
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2002;78(3-4):192-6
pubmed: 12652043
Clin Rehabil. 2010 May;24(5):444-53
pubmed: 20442256
Neurosurg Focus. 2006 Dec 15;21(6):E8
pubmed: 17341052
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006 Nov;7(11):873-81
pubmed: 17053811
Clin Neurophysiol. 2003 Aug;114(8):1521-30
pubmed: 12888036
J Clin Invest. 2018 Jun 1;128(6):2168-2176
pubmed: 29856366
F1000Res. 2019 Jul 23;8:
pubmed: 31354940
Neuroimage. 2020 Feb 1;206:116291
pubmed: 31639508
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2011 Oct;24(5):524-31
pubmed: 21772144
Brain Res Bull. 2015 Sep;118:82-6
pubmed: 26405006
Benef Microbes. 2018 Jun 15;9(4):603-611
pubmed: 29695180
Physiother Theory Pract. 2017 Mar;33(3):173-183
pubmed: 28339333
Pain Manag. 2017 Jan;7(1):59-69
pubmed: 27780402
Brain. 2015 Aug;138(Pt 8):2140-6
pubmed: 26072517
BMC Anesthesiol. 2017 May 26;17(1):69
pubmed: 28549447
Pain Manag Nurs. 2015 Aug;16(4):561-9
pubmed: 26092194
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 14;10:CD006380
pubmed: 27737513
Neuron. 2010 Apr 29;66(2):198-204
pubmed: 20434997
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2019 Jul 29;23(9):64
pubmed: 31359171
Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2016 Spring;54(2):121-39
pubmed: 26967805
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010 May;39(5):890-903
pubmed: 20471549
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2003;87:149-52
pubmed: 14518543
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2015 Jul;19(7):27
pubmed: 26049773
Pain. 2013 Aug;154(8):1274-80
pubmed: 23707312
J Pain. 2016 Aug;17(8):911-8
pubmed: 27260638
Neurol Res. 2011 Nov;33(9):953-8
pubmed: 22080997
Brain Res Bull. 2019 May;148:1-9
pubmed: 30862485
Int J Surg. 2010;8(5):336-41
pubmed: 20171303