Comparison of Balloon Trocar versus Telescopic Dissection Method for TEP Inguinal Hernia Repair.


Journal

Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP
ISSN: 1681-7168
Titre abrégé: J Coll Physicians Surg Pak
Pays: Pakistan
ID NLM: 9606447

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2021
Historique:
received: 14 02 2021
accepted: 24 05 2021
entrez: 9 6 2021
pubmed: 10 6 2021
medline: 22 6 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To compare the outcomes between two methods of dissection (balloon trocar vs. telescopic dissection) used in total extra-peritoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair. Comparative study. Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Sakarya University, conducted between January 2018 and January 2020. The study included patients who underwent elective TEP inguinal hernia repair. Preoperative and early postoperative results were compared, after the patients had been divided into a balloon trocar group (Group 1) and telescopic dissection group (Group 2). The technique performed depended on equipment availability. Permission was obtained from the Institutional Review Board. The study data are presented as descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, median, first quartile, third quartile, frequency and percentage); p-value <0.05 was considered significant. A total of 189 patients were included; 95 patients in Group 1 and 94 patients in Group 2. No significant differences in age, gender, body mass index, body weight, ASA performance status, operating time, duration of hospitalisation or postoperative bleeding values were observed between the groups (p >0.05). European Hernia Society Quality of Life pain score values ​​ were higher in Group 2 than Group 1 (p = 0.016). Telescopic dissection was cheaper than balloon dissection. The bleeding values and operating time were similar between the two methods, but telescopic dissection caused more postoperative pain. Key Words: Inguinal hernia, Telescopic dissection, Balloon dissection, Total extra-peritoneal (TEP) surgery.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34102770
pii: 040579197
doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2021.06.623
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

623-626

Auteurs

Emrah Akin (E)

Department of General Surgery, Sakarya University Research and Educational Hospital, Sakarya, Turkey.

Enes Bas (E)

Department of General Surgery, Sakarya University Research and Educational Hospital, Sakarya, Turkey.

Necattin Firat (N)

Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Sakarya University, Turkey.

Kayhan Ozdemir (K)

Department of General Surgery, Sakarya University Research and Educational Hospital, Sakarya, Turkey.

Recayi Capoglu (R)

Department of General Surgery, Sakarya University Research and Educational Hospital, Sakarya, Turkey.

Fatih Altintoprak (F)

Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Sakarya University, Turkey.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH