Clinical activity of durvalumab for patients with advanced mismatch repair-deficient and repair-proficient endometrial cancer. A nonrandomized phase 2 clinical trial.
clinical trials
immunotherapy
phase II as topic
programmed cell death 1 receptor
Journal
Journal for immunotherapy of cancer
ISSN: 2051-1426
Titre abrégé: J Immunother Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101620585
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2021
06 2021
Historique:
accepted:
31
03
2021
entrez:
9
6
2021
pubmed:
10
6
2021
medline:
21
12
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In this study, we assessed the activity of durvalumab, an antibody to programmed death ligand-1, in two cohorts of women with advanced endometrial cancers (AEC)-mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) and mismatch repair deficient (dMMR). A multicenter phase two study was performed in women with AEC with pMMR tumor progressing after one to three lines of chemotherapy and women with AEC with dMMR tumor progressing after zero to three lines of chemotherapy. Mismatch repair status was based on immunohistochemistry expression. All women received durvalumab 1500 mg given every 4 weeks until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective tumor response by RECIST V.1.1 modified for immune-based therapeutics. Seventy-one women were recruited: 35 dMMR and 36 pMMR. Median follow-up was 19 vs 21 months in dMMR versus pMMR, respectively. Median age was 67 years. Histology in dMMR versus pMMR included endometrioid (94% vs 57%) and serous (0% vs 31%) and was high grade in 26% vs 74%. The objective tumor response rate (OTRR) in the dMMR cohort was 47% (17/36, 95% CI 32 to 63), including 6 complete responses and 11 partial responses (PRs)) vs 3% in the pMMR cohort (1/35, 95% CI 1 to 15, PR). In the dMMR cohort, durvalumab was the first-line therapy in 58% (OTRR 57%) and the second-line therapy in 39% (OTRR 38%). Median progression-free survival was 8.3 months in the dMMR cohort vs 1.8 months in the pMMR cohort. The 12-month overall survival (OS) rate was 71% in dMMR vs 51% in pMMR, with median OS not reached for dMMR vs 12 months for pMMR. Immune-related adverse events occurred in 14 women, mostly grades 1-2. Durvalumab monotherapy showed promising activity and acceptable safety in AEC with dMMR regardless of prior lines of chemotherapy, but activity was limited in AEC with pMMR. ANZGOG1601, ACTRN12617000106336, and NCT03015129.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
In this study, we assessed the activity of durvalumab, an antibody to programmed death ligand-1, in two cohorts of women with advanced endometrial cancers (AEC)-mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) and mismatch repair deficient (dMMR).
METHODS
A multicenter phase two study was performed in women with AEC with pMMR tumor progressing after one to three lines of chemotherapy and women with AEC with dMMR tumor progressing after zero to three lines of chemotherapy. Mismatch repair status was based on immunohistochemistry expression. All women received durvalumab 1500 mg given every 4 weeks until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective tumor response by RECIST V.1.1 modified for immune-based therapeutics.
RESULTS
Seventy-one women were recruited: 35 dMMR and 36 pMMR. Median follow-up was 19 vs 21 months in dMMR versus pMMR, respectively. Median age was 67 years. Histology in dMMR versus pMMR included endometrioid (94% vs 57%) and serous (0% vs 31%) and was high grade in 26% vs 74%. The objective tumor response rate (OTRR) in the dMMR cohort was 47% (17/36, 95% CI 32 to 63), including 6 complete responses and 11 partial responses (PRs)) vs 3% in the pMMR cohort (1/35, 95% CI 1 to 15, PR). In the dMMR cohort, durvalumab was the first-line therapy in 58% (OTRR 57%) and the second-line therapy in 39% (OTRR 38%). Median progression-free survival was 8.3 months in the dMMR cohort vs 1.8 months in the pMMR cohort. The 12-month overall survival (OS) rate was 71% in dMMR vs 51% in pMMR, with median OS not reached for dMMR vs 12 months for pMMR. Immune-related adverse events occurred in 14 women, mostly grades 1-2.
CONCLUSION
Durvalumab monotherapy showed promising activity and acceptable safety in AEC with dMMR regardless of prior lines of chemotherapy, but activity was limited in AEC with pMMR.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS
ANZGOG1601, ACTRN12617000106336, and NCT03015129.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34103352
pii: jitc-2020-002255
doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-002255
pmc: PMC8190057
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Monoclonal
0
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
0
durvalumab
28X28X9OKV
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03015129']
ANZCTR
['ACTRN12617000106336']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: YA: honoraria from AstraZeneca and research funding from AstraZeneca. P-SK: research funding from AstraZeneca and honoraria from Pfizer. DS: stock or other ownership for SNP Pathology; honoraria from Mark Sharp & Dohme; and patents, royalties, and other intellectual property from Uniquest. MF: honoraria from Pfizer and AstraZeneca; and consulting or advisory role, or AstraZeneca and Pfizer. SB-H: consulting or advisory role from AstraZeneca, Novartis, and Pfizer; and travel and accommodation expenses from Novartis. CS: speakers’ bureau for AstraZeneca olaparib advisory board, Roche HER2+ breast cancer. JC: honoraria from Takeda, MSD; consulting or advisory role from Takeda, MSD; research funding from AstraZeneca; and travel, accommodation, and expenses from AMGEN-ESMO. PB: honoraria from Roche; consulting or advisory role from AstraZeneca; and travel and accommodation expenses from Astra Zeneca. TM: honoraria and research funding from AstraZeneca. MRS: research funding from Astra Zeneca.
Références
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Jan 10;32(2):90-100
pubmed: 24323032
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 25;372(26):2509-20
pubmed: 26028255
Lancet Oncol. 2011 Jan;12(1):49-55
pubmed: 21145788
J Clin Oncol. 2002 May 1;20(9):2360-4
pubmed: 11981008
J Hematol Oncol. 2018 Feb 27;11(1):31
pubmed: 29482595
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jan 1;38(1):1-10
pubmed: 31682550
J Clin Invest. 2016 Jun 1;126(6):2334-40
pubmed: 27159395
Cell. 2020 Dec 10;183(6):1634-1649.e17
pubmed: 33259803
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Oct 10;38(29):3388-3397
pubmed: 32749941
Nature. 2013 Oct 17;502(7471):333-339
pubmed: 24132290
Nature. 2013 May 2;497(7447):67-73
pubmed: 23636398
Gynecol Oncol. 1983 Feb;15(1):10-7
pubmed: 6822361
Hum Mutat. 2013 Mar;34(3):490-7
pubmed: 23255516
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Oct 20;37(30):2786-2794
pubmed: 31461377
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47
pubmed: 19097774
Cancer Cell. 2015 Apr 13;27(4):450-61
pubmed: 25858804
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 1;21(11):2110-4
pubmed: 12775736
Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Dec;151(3):401-406
pubmed: 30340772
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Feb 3;102(3):193-201
pubmed: 20028993
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Mar;18(3):e143-e152
pubmed: 28271869
Gastroenterology. 2008 Aug;135(2):419-28
pubmed: 18602922
Oncologist. 2016 Oct;21(10):1200-1211
pubmed: 27412392
Lancet Oncol. 2019 May;20(5):711-718
pubmed: 30922731
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Aug 1;35(22):2535-2541
pubmed: 28489510
Nat Genet. 2013 Oct;45(10):1113-20
pubmed: 24071849
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Nov 1;6(11):1766-1772
pubmed: 33001143
Am J Pathol. 1999 Jun;154(6):1805-13
pubmed: 10362805
Am J Surg Pathol. 2020 Feb;44(2):174-181
pubmed: 31651527
J Gynecol Oncol. 2018 May;29(3):e39
pubmed: 29533022
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018 Feb;16(2):170-199
pubmed: 29439178
Science. 2017 Jul 28;357(6349):409-413
pubmed: 28596308
Gynecol Oncol. 2006 Nov;103(2):523-6
pubmed: 16712905
Appl Clin Genet. 2014 Oct 06;7:183-93
pubmed: 25328415
Curr Opin Immunol. 2012 Apr;24(2):207-12
pubmed: 22236695
Gynecol Oncol. 1996 Oct;63(1):25-7
pubmed: 8898163