Why we should stop using animal-derived products on patients without their consent.

applied and professional ethics clinical ethics education for health care professionals ethics paternalism

Journal

Journal of medical ethics
ISSN: 1473-4257
Titre abrégé: J Med Ethics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7513619

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 Jun 2021
Historique:
received: 01 03 2021
accepted: 14 05 2021
entrez: 9 6 2021
pubmed: 10 6 2021
medline: 10 6 2021
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Medicines and medical devices containing animal-derived ingredients are frequently used on patients without their informed consent, despite a significant proportion of patients wanting to know if an animal-derived product is going to be used in their care. Here, I outline three arguments for why this practice is wrong. First, I argue that using animal-derived medical products on patients without their informed consent undermines respect for their autonomy. Second, it risks causing nontrivial psychological harm. Third, it is morally inconsistent to respect patients' dietary preferences and then use animal-derived medicines or medical devices on them without their informed consent. I then address several anticipated objections and conclude that the continued failure to address this issue is an ethical blind spot that warrants applying the principles of respect for autonomy and informed consent consistently.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34103364
pii: medethics-2021-107371
doi: 10.1136/medethics-2021-107371
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Auteurs

Daniel Rodger (D)

Institute of Health and Social Care, London South Bank University, School of Allied and Community Health, London SE1 0AA, UK daniel.rodger@lsbu.ac.uk.

Classifications MeSH