On Stereoscopic Art.

Dali Julesz Wheatstone anaglyphs binocular vision graphics photography random-dot stereograms stereoscopic art

Journal

i-Perception
ISSN: 2041-6695
Titre abrégé: Iperception
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101574031

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Historique:
received: 12 09 2020
accepted: 15 03 2021
entrez: 9 6 2021
pubmed: 10 6 2021
medline: 10 6 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Pictorial art is typically viewed with two eyes, but it is not binocular in the sense that it requires two eyes to appreciate the art. Two-dimensional representational art works allude to depth that they do not contain, and a variety of stratagems is enlisted to convey the impression that surfaces on the picture plane are at different distances from the viewer. With the invention of the stereoscope by Wheatstone in the 1830s, it was possible to produce two pictures with defined horizontal disparities between them to create a novel impression of depth. Stereoscopy and photography were made public at about the same time and their marriage was soon cemented; most stereoscopic art is now photographic. Wheatstone sought to examine stereoscopic depth without monocular pictorial cues. He was unable to do this, but it was achieved a century later by Julesz with random-dot stereograms The early history of non-photographic stereoscopic art is described as well as reference to some contemporary works. Novel stereograms employing a wider variety of carrier patterns than random dots are presented as anaglyphs; they show modulations of pictorial surface depths as well as inclusions within a binocular picture.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34104379
doi: 10.1177/20416695211007146
pii: 10.1177_20416695211007146
pmc: PMC8165537
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

20416695211007146

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2021.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Références

Perception. 1987;16(6):785-818
pubmed: 3331425
Perception. 1995;24(2):127-53
pubmed: 7617422
Perception. 2007;36(4):479-82
pubmed: 17564194
Perception. 2013;42(8):887-93
pubmed: 24303752
Iperception. 2017 Jan 01;8(1):2041669516680114
pubmed: 28203349
Vision Res. 1971 Dec;11(12):1491-2
pubmed: 5144663
Int J Psychophysiol. 2000 Apr;36(1):69-72
pubmed: 10700624
Perception. 2014;43(11):1141-4
pubmed: 25638932
Iperception. 2021 May 27;12(3):20416695211007146
pubmed: 34104379
Vision (Basel). 2019 May 08;3(2):
pubmed: 31735819
Iperception. 2021 Feb 24;12(1):2041669521992381
pubmed: 33717428
Perception. 2012;41(8):901-24
pubmed: 23362669
Perception. 2003;32(2):185-200
pubmed: 12696664
Perception. 2009;38(5):633-7
pubmed: 19662939
Sci Am. 1965 Feb;212:38-48
pubmed: 14272115

Auteurs

Nicholas J Wade (NJ)

Psychology, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom.

Classifications MeSH