Re-asserting the Specialness of Health Care.

Daniels duty to assist health care health needs special specialness thesis about health care

Journal

The Journal of medicine and philosophy
ISSN: 1744-5019
Titre abrégé: J Med Philos
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7610512

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 06 2021
Historique:
entrez: 9 6 2021
pubmed: 10 6 2021
medline: 29 10 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Is health care "special"? That is, do we have moral reason to treat health care differently from how we treat other sorts of social goods? Intuitively, perhaps, we might think the proper response is "yes." However, to date, philosophers have often struggled to justify this idea-known as the "specialness thesis about health care" or STHC. In this article, I offer a new justification of STHC, one I take to be immune from objections that have undercut other defenses. Notably, unlike previous utility- and opportunity-based theories, I argue that we can find normative justification for STHC in what I term our special duty to assist those unable to help themselves. It is this duty, I argue, that ultimately gives us reason to treat health care differently from other sorts of goods (even other goods meeting health needs) and to distribute it independently of individuals' ability to pay.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34106279
pii: 6295414
doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhab006
pmc: PMC8290276
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

272-296

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press, on behalf of the Journal of Medicine and Philosophy Inc. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Références

J Med Ethics. 2017 Aug;43(8):501-505
pubmed: 27273886
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010 Apr;64(4):284-91
pubmed: 19692738
J Med Philos. 1983 Nov;8(4):339-61
pubmed: 6655383
J Med Ethics. 2009 Jan;35(1):17-20
pubmed: 19103937
Am J Bioeth. 2001 Spring;1(2):2-16
pubmed: 11951872
McGill Law J. 1993;38(4):883-98
pubmed: 11656692
Res Publica. 2019 May;25(2):211-233
pubmed: 31501643
J Appl Philos. 2001;18(2):159-70
pubmed: 11785544
Health Econ. 2002 Dec;11(8):659-66
pubmed: 12457367
Law Med Health Care. 1986 Sep;14(3-4):172-4
pubmed: 3645228
Arch Gerontol Geriatr Suppl. 2004;(9):407-12
pubmed: 15207440
J Med Ethics. 2009 Jan;35(1):3-6
pubmed: 19103934
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002 Jul;56(7):485-7
pubmed: 12080153
Philos Public Aff. 1981 Spring;10(2):146-79
pubmed: 11661955

Auteurs

Benedict Rumbold (B)

University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH