One Does Not Fit All: European Study Shows Significant Differences in Value-Priorities in Clean Sport.
anti-doping
clean sport
culture
sport values
values-based education
Journal
Frontiers in sports and active living
ISSN: 2624-9367
Titre abrégé: Front Sports Act Living
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101765780
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
01
02
2021
accepted:
25
03
2021
entrez:
10
6
2021
pubmed:
11
6
2021
medline:
11
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Doping violates the Spirit of Sport and is thought to contradict the values which underpin this spirit. Values-based education (VBE) has been cited as a key element for creating a clean sport culture across age groups. Culturally relevant VBE requires understanding of the values that motivate athletes from different countries to practice their sport and uphold clean sport values. WADA's new International Standards for Education makes this study both needed and timely. Overall, 1,225 athletes from Germany, Greece, Italy, Russia, and the UK responded to measures assessing their general values, Spirit of Sport values, and their perceived importance of "clean sport". MaxDiff analysis identified the most important values to participants based on their respective country of residence. Correlation analysis was conducted to assess the relationship between importance of clean sport and Spirit of Sport values. There were significant differences between participant nationality and their perceived importance of clean sport [
Identifiants
pubmed: 34109312
doi: 10.3389/fspor.2021.662542
pmc: PMC8181163
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
662542Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Woolway, Elbe, Barkoukis, Bingham, Bochaver, Bondarev, Hudson, Kronenberg, Lazuras, Mallia, Ntovolis, Zelli and Petróczi.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
BMJ. 2008 Jul 04;337:a584
pubmed: 18614466
Int J Drug Policy. 2020 Oct;84:102865
pubmed: 32738700
J Sports Sci. 2020 Feb;38(4):357-365
pubmed: 31810403
J Sports Sci. 2021 Mar;39(5):533-541
pubmed: 33086940
J Sci Med Sport. 2012 Sep;15(5):381-5
pubmed: 22613257
Harm Reduct J. 2015 Nov 10;12:53
pubmed: 26556215
Front Psychol. 2017 May 22;8:717
pubmed: 28588518
Sports Med. 2002;32(4):269-84
pubmed: 11929355
J Appl Psychol. 2010 May;95(3):405-39
pubmed: 20476824
Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9
pubmed: 19565683
Nature. 2021 Apr;592(7852):S16
pubmed: 33790459
Science. 2011 May 27;332(6033):1100-4
pubmed: 21617077
Am J Bioeth. 2018 Jun;18(6):8-15
pubmed: 29852101
J Sport Health Sci. 2020 May;9(3):228-239
pubmed: 32444147
Med Sport Sci. 2017;62:160-176
pubmed: 28571017
Front Psychiatry. 2018 Apr 20;9:124
pubmed: 29731723
J Appl Psychol. 2006 Nov;91(6):1225-44
pubmed: 17100480