Interpretable Deep Models for Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy Response Prediction.

Cardiac MRI Cardiac resynchronization therapy Interpretable ML Variational autoencoder

Journal

Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention
Titre abrégé: Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101249582

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
entrez: 10 6 2021
pubmed: 1 1 2020
medline: 1 1 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Advances in deep learning (DL) have resulted in impressive accuracy in some medical image classification tasks, but often deep models lack interpretability. The ability of these models to explain their decisions is important for fostering clinical trust and facilitating clinical translation. Furthermore, for many problems in medicine there is a wealth of existing clinical knowledge to draw upon, which may be useful in generating explanations, but it is not obvious how this knowledge can be encoded into DL models - most models are learnt either from scratch or using transfer learning from a different domain. In this paper we address both of these issues. We propose a novel DL framework for image-based classification based on a variational autoencoder (VAE). The framework allows prediction of the output of interest from the latent space of the autoencoder, as well as visualisation (in the image domain) of the effects of crossing the decision boundary, thus enhancing the interpretability of the classifier. Our key contribution is that the VAE disentangles the latent space based on 'explanations' drawn from existing clinical knowledge. The framework can predict outputs as well as explanations for these outputs, and also raises the possibility of discovering new biomarkers that are separate (or disentangled) from the existing knowledge. We demonstrate our framework on the problem of predicting response of patients with cardiomyopathy to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) from cine cardiac magnetic resonance images. The sensitivity and specificity of the proposed model on the task of CRT response prediction are 88.43% and 84.39% respectively, and we showcase the potential of our model in enhancing understanding of the factors contributing to CRT response.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34109325
doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-59710-8_28
pmc: PMC7610934
mid: EMS124551
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

284-293

Subventions

Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 203148
Pays : United Kingdom

Références

Echocardiography. 2016 Nov;33(11):1745-1752
pubmed: 27562174
Eur J Heart Fail. 2019 Jan;21(1):74-85
pubmed: 30328654
Eur Heart J. 2013 Aug;34(29):2281-329
pubmed: 23801822
Eur Heart J. 2009 Apr;30(8):940-9
pubmed: 19004844
JAMA. 2007 Jun 13;297(22):2502-14
pubmed: 17565085
Med Image Anal. 2017 Jan;35:669-684
pubmed: 27770718
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Mar;17(3):262-9
pubmed: 26588984
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016 Feb 01;18:8
pubmed: 26830817
N Engl J Med. 2002 Jun 13;346(24):1845-53
pubmed: 12063368
Heart Rhythm. 2014 Oct;11(10):1790-7
pubmed: 24912138
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2020 Jun;39(6):2088-2099
pubmed: 31944949

Auteurs

Esther Puyol-Antón (E)

School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.

Chen Chen (C)

BioMedIA Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, UK.

James R Clough (JR)

School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.

Bram Ruijsink (B)

School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.

Baldeep S Sidhu (BS)

School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.

Justin Gould (J)

School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.

Bradley Porter (B)

School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.

Marc Elliott (M)

School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.

Vishal Mehta (V)

School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.

Daniel Rueckert (D)

BioMedIA Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Christopher A Rinaldi (CA)

School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.

Andrew P King (AP)

School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.

Classifications MeSH