Cutaneous adverse events in children treated with vemurafenib for refractory BRAF


Journal

Pediatric blood & cancer
ISSN: 1545-5017
Titre abrégé: Pediatr Blood Cancer
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101186624

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 2021
Historique:
revised: 16 04 2021
received: 28 12 2020
accepted: 29 04 2021
pubmed: 11 6 2021
medline: 17 3 2022
entrez: 10 6 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The somatic BRAF Multicentric retrospective observational study including patients <18 years treated with VMF alone for refractory BRAF Fifty-seven patients: 56% female, median age 2.1 years (0.2-14.6), median treatment duration 4.1 months (1.4-29.7). Forty-one patients (72%) had at least one CAE: photosensitivity (40%), keratosis pilaris (32%), rash (26%), xerosis (21%), and neutrophilic panniculitis (16%). No skin tumor was observed. Five percent of CAEs were grade 3. None were grade 4 or led to permanent VMF discontinuation. Dose reduction was necessary for 12% of patients, temporary treatment discontinuation for 16%, none leading to loss of efficacy. VMF dose, median RPL, and efficacy were not correlated with CAE occurrence. At doses used for pediatric LCH, CAEs are frequent but rarely severe and have little impact on the continuation of treatment when managed appropriately. Regular dermatological follow-up is essential to manage CAEs and screen for possible induced skin tumors.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The somatic BRAF
PROCEDURE
Multicentric retrospective observational study including patients <18 years treated with VMF alone for refractory BRAF
RESULTS
Fifty-seven patients: 56% female, median age 2.1 years (0.2-14.6), median treatment duration 4.1 months (1.4-29.7). Forty-one patients (72%) had at least one CAE: photosensitivity (40%), keratosis pilaris (32%), rash (26%), xerosis (21%), and neutrophilic panniculitis (16%). No skin tumor was observed. Five percent of CAEs were grade 3. None were grade 4 or led to permanent VMF discontinuation. Dose reduction was necessary for 12% of patients, temporary treatment discontinuation for 16%, none leading to loss of efficacy. VMF dose, median RPL, and efficacy were not correlated with CAE occurrence.
CONCLUSIONS
At doses used for pediatric LCH, CAEs are frequent but rarely severe and have little impact on the continuation of treatment when managed appropriately. Regular dermatological follow-up is essential to manage CAEs and screen for possible induced skin tumors.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34109735
doi: 10.1002/pbc.29140
doi:

Substances chimiques

Protein Kinase Inhibitors 0
Vemurafenib 207SMY3FQT
BRAF protein, human EC 2.7.11.1
Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf EC 2.7.11.1

Types de publication

Journal Article Observational Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e29140

Informations de copyright

© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Références

Allen CE, Merad M, McClain KL. Langerhans-cell histiocytosis. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(9):856-868.
Berres M-L, Lim KP, Peters T, et al. BRAF-V600E expression in precursor versus differentiated dendritic cells defines clinically distinct LCH risk groups. J Exp Med. 2014;211(4):669-683.
Badalian-Very G, Vergilio JA, Degar BA, et al. Recurrent BRAF mutations in Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Blood. 2010;116(11):1919-1923.
Satoh T, Smith A, Sarde A, et al. B-RAF mutant alleles associated with Langerhans cell histiocytosis, a granulomatous pediatric disease. PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e33891.
Pakneshan S, Salajegheh A, Smith RA, Lam AK-Y. Clinicopathological relevance of BRAF mutations in human cancer. Pathology. 2013;45(4):346-356.
Chapman PB, Hauschild A, Robert C, et al. Improved survival with vemurafenib in melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(26):2507-2516.
Gandolfi L, Adamo S, Pileri A, Broccoli A, Argnani L, Zinzani PL. Multisystemic and multiresistant Langerhans cell histiocytosis: a case treated with BRAF inhibitor. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2015;13(6):715-718.
Héritier S, Jehanne M, Leverger G, et al. Vemurafenib use in an infant for high-risk Langerhans cell histiocytosis. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1(6):836-838.
Kolenová A, Schwentner R, Jug G, et al. Targeted inhibition of the MAPK pathway: emerging salvage option for progressive life-threatening multisystem LCH. Blood Adv. 2017;1(6):352-356.
Heisig A, Sörensen J, Zimmermann SY, et al. Vemurafenib in Langerhans cell histiocytosis: report of a pediatric patient and review of the literature. Oncotarget. 2018;9(31):22236-22240.
Diamond EL, Subbiah V, Lockhart AC, et al. Vemurafenib for BRAF V600-mutant Erdheim-Chester disease and Langerhans cell histiocytosis: analysis of data from the histology-independent, phase 2, open-label VE-BASKET study. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4(3):384-388.
Donadieu J, Larabi IA, Tardieu M, et al. Vemurafenib for refractory multisystem Langerhans cell histiocytosis in children: an international observational study. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(31):2857-2865.
European Medicines Agency. Public Summary of Opinion on Orphan Designation. Vemurafenib for Treatment of Langerhans’ Cell Histiocytosis. p. 4.
Gençler B, Gönül M. Cutaneous side effects of BRAF inhibitors in advanced melanoma: review of the literature. Dermatol Res Pract. 2016;2016:5361569.
Larkin J, Vecchio MD, Ascierto PA, et al. Vemurafenib in patients with BRAF(V600) mutated metastatic melanoma: an open-label, multicentre, safety study. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(4):436-444.
Boussemart L, Routier E, Mateus C, et al. Prospective study of cutaneous side-effects associated with the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib: a study of 42 patients. Ann Oncol. 2013;24(6):1691-1697.
Lacouture ME, Duvic M, Hauschild A, et al. Analysis of dermatologic events in vemurafenib-treated patients with melanoma. Oncologist. 2013;18(3):314-322.
Sinha R, Larkin J, Gore M, Fearfield L. Cutaneous toxicities associated with vemurafenib therapy in 107 patients with BRAF V600E mutation-positive metastatic melanoma, including recognition and management of rare presentations. Br J Dermatol. 2015;173(4):1024-1031.
Chen P, Chen F, Zhou B. Systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence of dermatological toxicities associated with vemurafenib treatment in patients with melanoma. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2019;44(3):243-251.
McArthur GA, Chapman PB, Robert C, et al. Safety and efficacy of vemurafenib in BRAF(V600E) and BRAF(V600K) mutation-positive melanoma (BRIM-3): extended follow-up of a phase 3, randomised, open-label study. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(3):323-332.
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). 2017; p. 155.
Alvarez J-C, Funck-Brentano E, Abe E, Etting I, Saiag P, Knapp A. A LC/MS/MS micro-method for human plasma quantification of vemurafenib. Application to treated melanoma patients. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2014;97:29-32.
Flaherty KT, Puzanov I, Kim KB, et al. Inhibition of mutated, activated BRAF in metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(9):809-819.
Sosman JA, Kim KB, Schuchter L, et al. Survival in BRAF V600-mutant advanced melanoma treated with vemurafenib. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(8):707-714.
Peuvrel L, Quéreux G, Saint-Jean M, et al. Profile of vemurafenib-induced severe skin toxicities. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2016;30(2):250-257.
Wu JH, Cohen DN, Rady PL, Tyring SK. BRAF inhibitor-associated cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: new mechanistic insight, emerging evidence for viral involvement and perspectives on clinical management. Br J Dermatol. 2017;177(4):914-923.
Oberholzer PA, Damien K, Dziunycz P, et al. RAS mutations are associated with the development of cutaneous squamous cell tumors in patients treated with RAF inhibitors. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(3):316-321.
Su F, Amaya V, Milagre C, et al. RAS mutations in cutaneous squamous-cell carcinomas in patients treated with BRAF inhibitors. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(3):207-215.
Zimmer L, Hillen U, Livingstone E, et al. Atypical melanocytic proliferations and new primary melanomas in patients with advanced melanoma undergoing selective BRAF inhibition. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(19):2375-2383.
Hatzivassiliou G, Song K, Yen I, et al. RAF inhibitors prime wild-type RAF to activate the MAPK pathway and enhance growth. Nature. 2010;464(7287):431-435.
Parekh V, Sobanko J, Miller CJ, et al. NRAS Q61R and BRAF G466A mutations in atypical melanocytic lesions newly arising in advanced melanoma patients treated with vemurafenib. J Cutan Pathol. 2019;46(3):190-194.
Bower MR, Scoggins CR, Martin RCG, et al. Second primary melanomas: incidence and outcome. Am Surg. 2010;76(7):675-681.
Gilchrest BA, Eller MS, Geller AC, Yaar M. The pathogenesis of melanoma induced by ultraviolet radiation. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(17):1341-1348.
Chisholm JC, Suvada J, Dunkel IJ, et al. BRIM-P: a phase I, open-label, multicenter, dose-escalation study of vemurafenib in pediatric patients with surgically incurable, BRAF mutation-positive melanoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2018;65(5):e26947.
Perier-Muzet M, Thomas L, Poulalhon N, et al. Melanoma patients under vemurafenib: prospective follow-up of melanocytic lesions by digital dermoscopy. J Invest Dermatol. 2014;134(5):1351-1358.
Rinderknecht JD, Goldinger SM, Rozati S, et al. RASopathic skin eruptions during vemurafenib therapy. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58721.
Jew OS, Provini LE, Treat JR. Severe vemurafenib-induced photosensitivity in a 6-year-old boy. Pediatr Dermatol. 2019;36(1):e62-e63.
Büyükkapu Bay S, Kebudi R, Zülfikar B. Cutaneous adverse event associated with vemurafenib in a 3-year-old pediatric patient with BRAF mutation-positive metastatic melanoma and factor X deficiency. Melanoma Res. 2019;29(1):99-101.
Chen L, Hsi AC, Kothari A, Dehner LP, Hayashi RJ, Coughlin CC. Granulomatous dermatitis secondary to vemurafenib in a child with Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Pediatr Dermatol. 2018;35(6):e402-e403.
Bhat T, Rosman IS, Coughlin CC. Comment on “Bumps in the road: panniculitis in children and adolescents treated with vemurafenib.” Pediatr Dermatol. 2018;35(2):287-288.
Upadhyaya SA, Robinson GW, Harreld JH, et al. Marked functional recovery and imaging response of refractory optic pathway glioma to BRAFV600E inhibitor therapy: a report of two cases. Childs Nerv Syst. 2018;34(4):605-610.
Aguilera D, Janss A, Mazewski C, et al. Successful retreatment of a child with a refractory brainstem ganglioglioma with vemurafenib. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2016;63(3):541-543.
delBufalo F, Carai A, Figà-Talamanca L, et al. Response of recurrent BRAFV600E mutated ganglioglioma to vemurafenib as single agent. J Transl Med. 2014;12:356.
Robinson GW, Orr BA, Gajjar A. Complete clinical regression of a BRAF V600E-mutant pediatric glioblastoma multiforme after BRAF inhibitor therapy. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:258.
West ES, Williams VL, Morelli JG. Vemurafenib-induced neutrophilic panniculitis in a child with a brainstem glioma. Pediatr Dermatol. 2015;32(1):153-154.
Bautista F, Paci A, Minard-Colin V, et al. Vemurafenib in pediatric patients with BRAFV600E mutated high-grade gliomas. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2014;61(6):1101-1103.
Dummer R, Rinderknecht J, Goldinger SM. Ultraviolet A and photosensitivity during vemurafenib therapy. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(5):480-481.
Gey A, Milpied B, Dutriaux C, et al. Severe cutaneous adverse reaction associated with vemurafenib: DRESS, AGEP or overlap reaction? J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2016;30(1):178-179.
Kim A, Cohen MS. The discovery of vemurafenib for the treatment of BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma. Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2016;11(9):907-916.
Hagen B, Trinh VA. Managing side effects of vemurafenib therapy for advanced melanoma. J Adv Pract Oncol. 2014;5(6):400-410.
https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/zelboraf-epar-product-information_fr.pdf. Accessed April 11, 2020.
Vázquez-Osorio I, Sánchez-Aguilar MD, García-Rodiño S, Suárez-Peñaranda JM, Aliste C, Vázquez-Veiga H. Vemurafenib-induced neutrophilic panniculitis: a new case and review of the literature. Am J Dermatopathol. 2016;38(7):e93-e96.
Mössner R, Zimmer L, Berking C, et al. Erythema nodosum-like lesions during BRAF inhibitor therapy: report on 16 new cases and review of the literature. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015;29(9):1797-1806.
Maldonado-Seral C, Berros-Fombella JP, Vivanco-Allende B, Coto-Segura P, Vazquez-Lopez F, Perez-Oliva N. Vemurafenib-associated neutrophilic panniculitis: an emergent adverse effect of variable severity. Dermatol Online J. 2013;19(4):16.
Flaherty KT, Infante JR, Daud A, et al. Combined BRAF and MEK inhibition in melanoma with BRAF V600 mutations. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(18):1694-1703.

Auteurs

Mathilde Tardieu (M)

Pediatric Dermatology Department, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France.

Amélie Néron (A)

Dermatology Department, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France.

Sophie Duvert-Lehembre (S)

Dermatology Department, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France.

Islam Amine Larabi (I)

Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Paris-Saclay University (Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines University), Inserm U-1173, Raymond Poincaré Hospital, Garches, France.

Mohamed Barkaoui (M)

French Reference Center for Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis, Trousseau Hospital, Paris, France.

Jean-Francois Emile (JF)

Pathology Department & EA4340-BECCOH, Ambroise Paré Hospital, AP-HP & Versailles SQY University, Boulogne, France.

Arnaud Seigneurin (A)

TIMC-IMAG Laboratory, Grenoble Alpes University, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France.

Franck Boralevi (F)

Pediatric Dermatology Unit, Hôpital Pellegrin-Enfants, Bordeaux, France.

Jean Donadieu (J)

French Reference Center for Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis, Trousseau Hospital, Paris, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH