Guidelines on analgosedation, monitoring, and recovery time for flexible bronchoscopy: a systematic review.
Bronchoscopy
Capnometry
Guideline
Hypercapnia
Monitoring
Patient safety
Recovery time
Journal
BMC pulmonary medicine
ISSN: 1471-2466
Titre abrégé: BMC Pulm Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968563
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 Jun 2021
10 Jun 2021
Historique:
received:
07
01
2021
accepted:
10
05
2021
entrez:
11
6
2021
pubmed:
12
6
2021
medline:
23
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Patients undergoing bronchoscopy in spontaneous breathing are prone to hypoxaemia and hypercapnia. Sedation, airway obstruction, and lung diseases impair respiration and gas exchange. The restitution of normal respiration takes place in the recovery room. Nonetheless, there is no evidence on the necessary observation time. We systematically reviewed current guidelines on bronchoscopy regarding sedation, monitoring and recovery. This review was registered at the PROSPERO database (CRD42020197476). MEDLINE and awmf.org were double-searched for official guidelines, recommendation or consensus statements on bronchoscopy from 2010 to 2020. The PICO-process focussed on adults (Patients), bronchoscopy with maintained spontaneous breathing (Interventions), and recommendations regarding the intra- and postprocedural monitoring and sedation (O). The guideline quality was graded. A catalogue of 54 questions was answered. Strength of recommendation and evidence levels were recorded for each recommendation. Six guidelines on general bronchoscopy and three expert statements on special bronchoscopic procedures were identified. Four guidelines were evidence-based. Most guidelines recommend sedation to improve the patient's tolerance. Midazolam combined with an opioid is preferred. The standard monitoring consists of non-invasive blood pressure, and pulse oximetry, furthermore electrocardiogram in cardiac patients. Only one guideline discusses hypercapnia and capnometry, but without consensus. Two guidelines discuss a recovery time of two hours, but a recommendation was not given because of lack of evidence. Evidence for most issues is low to moderate. Lung-diseased patients are not represented by current guidelines. Capnometry and recovery time lack evidence. More primary research in these fields is needed so that future guidelines may address these issues, too.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Patients undergoing bronchoscopy in spontaneous breathing are prone to hypoxaemia and hypercapnia. Sedation, airway obstruction, and lung diseases impair respiration and gas exchange. The restitution of normal respiration takes place in the recovery room. Nonetheless, there is no evidence on the necessary observation time. We systematically reviewed current guidelines on bronchoscopy regarding sedation, monitoring and recovery.
METHODS
METHODS
This review was registered at the PROSPERO database (CRD42020197476). MEDLINE and awmf.org were double-searched for official guidelines, recommendation or consensus statements on bronchoscopy from 2010 to 2020. The PICO-process focussed on adults (Patients), bronchoscopy with maintained spontaneous breathing (Interventions), and recommendations regarding the intra- and postprocedural monitoring and sedation (O). The guideline quality was graded. A catalogue of 54 questions was answered. Strength of recommendation and evidence levels were recorded for each recommendation.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Six guidelines on general bronchoscopy and three expert statements on special bronchoscopic procedures were identified. Four guidelines were evidence-based. Most guidelines recommend sedation to improve the patient's tolerance. Midazolam combined with an opioid is preferred. The standard monitoring consists of non-invasive blood pressure, and pulse oximetry, furthermore electrocardiogram in cardiac patients. Only one guideline discusses hypercapnia and capnometry, but without consensus. Two guidelines discuss a recovery time of two hours, but a recommendation was not given because of lack of evidence.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Evidence for most issues is low to moderate. Lung-diseased patients are not represented by current guidelines. Capnometry and recovery time lack evidence. More primary research in these fields is needed so that future guidelines may address these issues, too.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34112130
doi: 10.1186/s12890-021-01532-4
pii: 10.1186/s12890-021-01532-4
pmc: PMC8193886
doi:
Substances chimiques
Analgesics, Opioid
0
Carbon Dioxide
142M471B3J
Midazolam
R60L0SM5BC
Types de publication
Journal Article
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
198Références
Minerva Anestesiol. 2013 Jun;79(6):683-94
pubmed: 23419342
Thorax. 2013 Aug;68 Suppl 1:i1-i44
pubmed: 23860341
Respir Med. 1998 May;92(5):739-42
pubmed: 9713633
Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 2009 Mar;71(1):8-14
pubmed: 19522159
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014 May;11(4):645-52
pubmed: 24701974
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Dec;63(12):1308-11
pubmed: 20656455
Lung India. 2019 Jan-Feb;36(1):48-59
pubmed: 30604705
J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2016 Jul;23(3):187-8
pubmed: 27454471
Anesthesiology. 1960 Nov-Dec;21:652-63
pubmed: 13737968
Eur Clin Respir J. 2016 Nov 11;3:33324
pubmed: 27839531
Chest. 2020 Sep;158(3):1268-1281
pubmed: 32361152
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2020 Apr 12;43(4):288-296
pubmed: 32294813
Chest. 2011 Nov;140(5):1342-1350
pubmed: 22045879
Eur Respir J. 2006 Aug;28(2):386-90
pubmed: 16641122
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017 Jan 04;12:177-187
pubmed: 28115841
Respiration. 2021;100(10):958-968
pubmed: 33849040
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2020 Mar;7(1):
pubmed: 32152177
Laryngorhinootologie. 2010 Aug;89(8):473-6
pubmed: 20714973
Eur Respir J. 2009 Nov;34(5):1024-30
pubmed: 19386684
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Mar;111(3):395-404
pubmed: 26902229
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2010 Aug;23(4):494-9
pubmed: 20585246
Clin Chest Med. 2018 Mar;39(1):65-77
pubmed: 29433726
Chest. 1999 May;115(5):1437-40
pubmed: 10334165
Z Gastroenterol. 2015 Dec;53(12):E1-227
pubmed: 26783975
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2003 Apr;47(4):411-5
pubmed: 12694138
Anesthesiology. 2018 Mar;128(3):437-479
pubmed: 29334501
Chest. 2004 Nov;126(5):1552-8
pubmed: 15539726
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2019 Jun 12;42(6):405-412
pubmed: 31189225
Respirology. 2009 Aug;14(6):873-6
pubmed: 19703068
Laryngorhinootologie. 2016 May;95(5):321-31
pubmed: 27135426
Singapore Med J. 2013 Apr;54(4):212-5
pubmed: 23624448
Respirology. 2017 Nov;22(8):1579-1584
pubmed: 28613389
Respiration. 2018;96(1):1-11
pubmed: 29991060
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 01;4:1
pubmed: 25554246
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2020 Mar 12;43(3):199-202
pubmed: 32164088
Gastrointest Endosc. 2002 Jun;55(7):826-31
pubmed: 12024135
Eur Respir J. 2009 Dec;34(6):1277-83
pubmed: 19443532
Isr Med Assoc J. 2010 Feb;12(2):69-73
pubmed: 20550027
J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2014 Oct;21(4):370-1
pubmed: 25321464
Anaesthesia. 2016 Jan;71(1):85-93
pubmed: 26582586
Chest. 2020 Jul;158(1):393-400
pubmed: 32067944
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2010 Feb;70(1):60-4
pubmed: 19958069
J Clin Anesth. 2011 May;23(3):189-96
pubmed: 21497076
Anesthesiology. 2002 Apr;96(4):1004-17
pubmed: 11964611
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Apr 1;191(7):796-803
pubmed: 25574801
Chest. 1990 Dec;98(6):1327-30
pubmed: 2245669
Lung India. 2019 Jul;36(Supplement):S37-S89
pubmed: 32445309
Pneumologie. 2011 Nov;65(11):647-52
pubmed: 22083288
Respir Med. 2011 Apr;105(4):602-7
pubmed: 21115237
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018 Jan;35(1):6-24
pubmed: 28877145
Z Gastroenterol. 2015 Aug;53(8):802-42
pubmed: 26284330
Respiration. 2019;97(5):484-494
pubmed: 30970361
Pneumologie. 2020 Aug;74(8):515-544
pubmed: 32823360
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2019 Aug 12;42(8):573-590
pubmed: 31378019
Respirology. 1998 Jun;3(2):81-5
pubmed: 9692514
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Oct;94(40):e1459
pubmed: 26447999