Analysis of the illicit tobacco market in Georgia in response to fiscal and non-fiscal tobacco control measures.


Journal

Tobacco control
ISSN: 1468-3318
Titre abrégé: Tob Control
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9209612

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 2023
Historique:
received: 04 12 2020
revised: 18 04 2021
accepted: 27 04 2021
pubmed: 12 6 2021
medline: 20 12 2022
entrez: 11 6 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Georgian illicit cigarette consumption was 1.5% in 2017. In 2018, a new tobacco control law took effect followed by a substantial cigarette excise tax increase in 2019. Research shows these policies reduce tobacco consumption, but the tobacco industry argues they increase illicit trade. There is limited evidence on this, particularly from developing countries. A panel household survey in Georgia obtained data over three waves: 2017 baseline, 2018 after the tobacco control law took effect and 2019 after taxes increased. A sample of 1578 smokers (and quitters in later waves) from five regions reported their tobacco use and were asked to present a cigarette pack in their possession. These were examined for tax stamps and health warnings to establish legality. There was no evidence of an increase in illicit cigarette consumption in Tbilisi, Kutaisi, Akhaltsikhe or Gori in any wave. In Zugdidi, near the Russian-occupied Abkhazia, illicit cigarette consumption was increasing even prior to the tax increase, reaching 30.9% by wave 3. A country-wide shift occurred from manufactured cigarettes to roll-your-own tobacco (whose tax remained unchanged) between waves 2 and 3. No evidence of a country-wide increase in illicit cigarette trade was found after non-fiscal tobacco measures took effect and cigarette taxes increased. Relatively high illicit cigarette consumption in Zugdidi highlights the role of disputed territories and border administration in illicit cigarette supply. Substitution towards roll-your-own tobacco after manufactured cigarette taxes increased demonstrates the importance of equalising taxes on tobacco products to maximise public health benefits.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Georgian illicit cigarette consumption was 1.5% in 2017. In 2018, a new tobacco control law took effect followed by a substantial cigarette excise tax increase in 2019. Research shows these policies reduce tobacco consumption, but the tobacco industry argues they increase illicit trade. There is limited evidence on this, particularly from developing countries.
METHODS
A panel household survey in Georgia obtained data over three waves: 2017 baseline, 2018 after the tobacco control law took effect and 2019 after taxes increased. A sample of 1578 smokers (and quitters in later waves) from five regions reported their tobacco use and were asked to present a cigarette pack in their possession. These were examined for tax stamps and health warnings to establish legality.
FINDINGS
There was no evidence of an increase in illicit cigarette consumption in Tbilisi, Kutaisi, Akhaltsikhe or Gori in any wave. In Zugdidi, near the Russian-occupied Abkhazia, illicit cigarette consumption was increasing even prior to the tax increase, reaching 30.9% by wave 3. A country-wide shift occurred from manufactured cigarettes to roll-your-own tobacco (whose tax remained unchanged) between waves 2 and 3.
CONCLUSION
No evidence of a country-wide increase in illicit cigarette trade was found after non-fiscal tobacco measures took effect and cigarette taxes increased. Relatively high illicit cigarette consumption in Zugdidi highlights the role of disputed territories and border administration in illicit cigarette supply. Substitution towards roll-your-own tobacco after manufactured cigarette taxes increased demonstrates the importance of equalising taxes on tobacco products to maximise public health benefits.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34112646
pii: tobaccocontrol-2020-056404
doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-056404
pmc: PMC9763157
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

80-85

Subventions

Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : 30845
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Références

Nicotine Tob Res. 2019 Jul 17;21(8):1079-1086
pubmed: 29767772
Tob Control. 2020 Oct;29(Suppl 4):s227-s233
pubmed: 30659105
Tob Control. 2020 Oct;29(Suppl 4):s249-s253
pubmed: 31217282
Eur J Public Health. 2020 Oct 1;30(5):1007-1012
pubmed: 32588045

Auteurs

Megan Little (M)

School of Economics, Research Unit on the Economics of Excisable Products, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, Western Cape, South Africa firdaleconsulting@gmail.com.

Hana Ross (H)

School of Economics, Research Unit on the Economics of Excisable Products, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, Western Cape, South Africa.

George Bakhturidze (G)

Tobacco Control Research, FCTC Implementation and Monitoring Center in Georgia, Tbilisi, Georgia.

Iago Kachkachishvili (I)

Sociology and Social Work Department, Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi, Georgia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH