Projected losses of ecosystem services in the US disproportionately affect non-white and lower-income populations.
Journal
Nature communications
ISSN: 2041-1723
Titre abrégé: Nat Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101528555
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 06 2021
10 06 2021
Historique:
received:
27
10
2020
accepted:
12
05
2021
entrez:
11
6
2021
pubmed:
12
6
2021
medline:
12
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Addressing how ecosystem services (ES) are distributed among groups of people is critical for making conservation and environmental policy-making more equitable. Here, we evaluate the distribution and equity of changes in ES benefits across demographic and socioeconomic groups in the United States (US) between 2020 and 2100. Specifically, we use land cover and population projections to model potential shifts in the supply, demand, and benefits of the following ES: provision of clean air, protection against a vector-borne disease (West Nile virus), and crop pollination. Across the US, changes in ES benefits are unevenly distributed among socioeconomic and demographic groups and among rural and urban communities, but are relatively uniform across geographic regions. In general, non-white, lower-income, and urban populations disproportionately bear the burden of declines in ES benefits. This is largely driven by the conversion of forests and wetlands to cropland and urban land cover in counties where these populations are expected to grow. In these locations, targeted land use policy interventions are required to avoid exacerbating inequalities already present in the US.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34112778
doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23905-3
pii: 10.1038/s41467-021-23905-3
pmc: PMC8192915
doi:
Banques de données
figshare
['10.6084/m9.figshare.13622774']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3511Références
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2011 Feb;84(2):234-8
pubmed: 21292890
Ann Bot. 2009 Jun;103(9):1589-600
pubmed: 19324897
Disasters. 1999 Jun;23(2):156-73
pubmed: 10379098
Sci Adv. 2019 Oct 09;5(10):eaax8995
pubmed: 31633030
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jun 2;112(22):6949-54
pubmed: 26038547
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 24;14(7):e0219242
pubmed: 31339927
Ecol Lett. 2013 May;16(5):584-99
pubmed: 23489285
Environ Res. 1995 Apr;69(1):15-30
pubmed: 7588491
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jan 5;113(1):140-5
pubmed: 26699460
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Dec 30;111(52):18490-5
pubmed: 25512510
Science. 2017 Jun 30;356(6345):1362-1369
pubmed: 28663496
Ecol Appl. 2011 Oct;21(7):2637-51
pubmed: 22073649
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Feb 8;284(1848):
pubmed: 28179512
Glob Chang Biol. 2017 Jan;23(1):28-41
pubmed: 27507077
Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Feb 7;274(1608):303-13
pubmed: 17164193
Ecol Lett. 2008 May;11(5):499-515
pubmed: 18294214
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 19;12(4):e0176131
pubmed: 28423049
Science. 2019 Oct 11;366(6462):255-258
pubmed: 31601772
Energy (Oxf). 2017 Sep 15;135:718-725
pubmed: 29033490
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 May 20;111(20):7492-7
pubmed: 24799685
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Dec 7;107(49):20887-92
pubmed: 21078956
Sci Data. 2019 Feb 05;6:190005
pubmed: 30720801
Ecol Appl. 2014 Jul;24(5):1015-36
pubmed: 25154094
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Mar 5;110(10):4134-9
pubmed: 23431143
Science. 2018 Jan 19;359(6373):270-272
pubmed: 29348221
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Mar 26;116(13):6001-6006
pubmed: 30858319
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Feb 10;703:135005
pubmed: 31733497
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Dec 22;117(51):32799-32805
pubmed: 33288690