An Advanced Clinician Practitioner in Arthritis Care (ACPAC) Maintains a Positive Patient Experience While Increasing Capacity in Rheumatology Community Care.
extended role practitioner
health service accessibility
integrated delivery systems
interprofessional practice
model of care
patient satisfaction
quality improvement
rheumatology
Journal
Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare
ISSN: 1178-2390
Titre abrégé: J Multidiscip Healthc
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101512691
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
30
01
2021
accepted:
06
04
2021
entrez:
11
6
2021
pubmed:
12
6
2021
medline:
12
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study describes patient care experiences of solo-rheumatologist and co-managed care models utilizing an Advanced Clinician Practitioner in Arthritis Care-trained Extended Role Practitioner (ACPAC-ERP) in three community rheumatology practices. Patients with inflammatory arthritis (IA) were assigned to care provided by one of three (2 senior, 1 early-career) community-based rheumatologists (usual care), or an ACPAC-ERP (co-managed care) for the 6-months following diagnosis. Patient experiences were surveyed using validated measures of patient satisfaction (Patient Doctor Interaction Scale-PDIS), global ratings of confidence and satisfaction, referral patterns, disease activity (RADAI) and self-perceived disability (HAQ-Disability) as well as demographic information. Practice capacity was evaluated 18-months prior to, and across, the study period. Of 55 participants (mean age 56.6 years, 61.8% female), 33 received co-managed care. Most participants were diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis (65.5%) with a median symptom duration of 1.1 years. At 6-months, patients from both models of care were equally satisfied in terms of the information provided (usual care 4.6 vs co-managed care 4.7/5=greater satisfaction), rapport with health-care provider (4.6 vs 4.6/5) and having needs met (4.7 vs 4.5/5). Overall satisfaction was high (87.2 vs 85.3/100=completely satisfied) as was confidence in the system by which care was received (85.0 vs 82.1/100=completely confident). Usual care patients reported higher perceived disability than co-managed patients (HAQ-Disability 0.5 vs 0.2/3=unable to do). Significant differences in overall RADAI score (p=0.014) were found between the two models. The senior rheumatologist, with a previously saturated practice, attained a 37% capacity increase for new patients utilizing the co-managed care model. The ACPAC-ERP model was equivalent to the solo-rheumatologist model with regard to patient experience and satisfaction. A co-management model utilizing a highly trained ACPAC-ERP can increase capacity in community rheumatology clinics for patients newly diagnosed with IA while maintaining confidence and satisfaction with their care.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34113118
doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S304206
pii: 304206
pmc: PMC8184238
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1299-1310Informations de copyright
© 2021 Ahluwalia et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors report no conflict of interests in this work.
Références
Eval Health Prof. 1984 Mar;7(1):77-94
pubmed: 10265750
J Rheumatol. 1990 Aug;17(8):1022-4
pubmed: 2213777
Psychooncology. 2000 May-Jun;9(3):203-13
pubmed: 10871716
BMJ Open. 2014 Jan 31;4(1):e003888
pubmed: 24486677
Patient Educ Couns. 1992 Feb;19(1):75-80
pubmed: 1298951
J Rheumatol. 2003 Jan;30(1):167-78
pubmed: 12508408
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017 Oct;69(10):1495-1503
pubmed: 27998044
J Occup Environ Med. 2006 Feb;48(2):135-48
pubmed: 16474262
Int J Qual Health Care. 1999 Jun;11(3):233-40
pubmed: 10435845
Can J Public Health. 2013 Oct 31;104(7):e450-5
pubmed: 24495819
Clin Rheumatol. 2011 Mar;30 Suppl 1:S33-9
pubmed: 21350796
Reumatol Clin (Engl Ed). 2019 Mar - Apr;15(2):102-108
pubmed: 28711461
J Rheumatol. 2017 Feb;44(2):248-257
pubmed: 27909087
Eval Program Plann. 1983;6(3-4):185-210
pubmed: 10299618
Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Jan;75(1):3-15
pubmed: 25969430
J Rheumatol. 2016 Nov;43(11):2064-2067
pubmed: 27585684
J Health Psychol. 2008 Apr;13(3):388-400
pubmed: 18420772
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2019 Jan 07;12:63-71
pubmed: 30662267
Med Care. 1988 Apr;26(4):393-402
pubmed: 3352332
Arthritis Rheum. 1980 Feb;23(2):137-45
pubmed: 7362664
CMAJ Open. 2016 May 11;4(2):E205-12
pubmed: 27398365
Healthc Q. 2015;18(3):7-10
pubmed: 26718246
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jan;73(1):62-8
pubmed: 24095940
Open Access Rheumatol. 2015 Aug 19;7:45-53
pubmed: 27790044
Med Care Rev. 1993 Spring;50(1):49-79
pubmed: 10125117
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2003 Mar;42(3):422-6
pubmed: 12626791
J Public Health Med. 1992 Sep;14(3):236-49
pubmed: 1419201
J Rheumatol. 2020 Mar;47(3):468-476
pubmed: 31203224
Physiother Can. 2011 Winter;63(1):94-103
pubmed: 22210986
Pragmat Obs Res. 2020 Jan 28;11:1-12
pubmed: 32095089
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017 Jan;69(1):104-114
pubmed: 27110847
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Oct 1;30(19):2121-8
pubmed: 16205336
J Rheumatol. 2012 Nov;39(11):2088-97
pubmed: 22896027
J Rheumatol. 2020 Dec 1;:
pubmed: 33262302
J Rheumatol. 2020 Mar;47(3):461-467
pubmed: 31154411
Rheumatol Int. 2017 Sep;37(9):1551-1557
pubmed: 28455559
J Altern Complement Med. 2005;11 Suppl 1:S51-6
pubmed: 16332187
J Fam Pract. 1983 Sep;17(3):479-83
pubmed: 6886650
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Feb;73(2):357-64
pubmed: 23385306
Arthritis Rheum. 2010 Dec;62(12):3519-21
pubmed: 20722032