Mixed Methods Study of Nurse Assessment of Patient Preferences for Engagement During Hospitalization.
Journal
Nursing research
ISSN: 1538-9847
Titre abrégé: Nurs Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0376404
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
pubmed:
12
6
2021
medline:
21
9
2021
entrez:
11
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Global healthcare initiatives emphasize the importance of engaging patients in their healthcare to improve patients' experience and outcomes. Assessing patient preferences for engagement is critical, as there are many ways patients can engage in their care and preferences vary across individuals. The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of implementation of the Patient Preferences for Engagement Tool 13-Item Short Form (PPET13) during hospitalization on patient and nurse experience of engagement. Readmissions and emergency department (ED) usage within 30 days postdischarge were also examined. The mixed methods study was conducted within two medical units in the United States between December 2018 and May 2019. Preimplementation group patients completed a demographic survey and the Patient Experience of Engagement Survey (PEES) on discharge. Implementation group patients completed the PPET13 within 24 hours of admission with their nurse and the demographic survey and PEES on discharge. A focus group with nurses who implemented the PPET13 was conducted following the implementation period. Data analysis included confirmatory factor analysis, multiple and logistic regression, and qualitative content analysis. There was significant improvement in PEES scores during the implementation phase. The PEES score was a significant predictor of ED visits, but not 30-day readmissions. Nurses were not always certain how to best integrate patient preferences for engagement into their care delivery and suggested integrating the PPET13 into the electronic health record to assist with streamlining the assessment and communicating preferences across the care team. Assessing patients' preferences for engagement using the PPET13 was associated with an improved experience of engagement, which was found to mediate the relationship between utilization of PPET13 and ED usage within 30 days postdischarge. Use of a patient engagement preference tool, such as the PPET13, can help inform the delivery of individualized engagement strategies to improve patient and family engagement and outcomes; however, nurses need formalized education on how to tailor their care to meet the individual engagement preferences of their patients.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Global healthcare initiatives emphasize the importance of engaging patients in their healthcare to improve patients' experience and outcomes. Assessing patient preferences for engagement is critical, as there are many ways patients can engage in their care and preferences vary across individuals.
OBJECTIVE
The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of implementation of the Patient Preferences for Engagement Tool 13-Item Short Form (PPET13) during hospitalization on patient and nurse experience of engagement. Readmissions and emergency department (ED) usage within 30 days postdischarge were also examined.
METHODS
The mixed methods study was conducted within two medical units in the United States between December 2018 and May 2019. Preimplementation group patients completed a demographic survey and the Patient Experience of Engagement Survey (PEES) on discharge. Implementation group patients completed the PPET13 within 24 hours of admission with their nurse and the demographic survey and PEES on discharge. A focus group with nurses who implemented the PPET13 was conducted following the implementation period. Data analysis included confirmatory factor analysis, multiple and logistic regression, and qualitative content analysis.
RESULTS
There was significant improvement in PEES scores during the implementation phase. The PEES score was a significant predictor of ED visits, but not 30-day readmissions. Nurses were not always certain how to best integrate patient preferences for engagement into their care delivery and suggested integrating the PPET13 into the electronic health record to assist with streamlining the assessment and communicating preferences across the care team.
DISCUSSION
Assessing patients' preferences for engagement using the PPET13 was associated with an improved experience of engagement, which was found to mediate the relationship between utilization of PPET13 and ED usage within 30 days postdischarge. Use of a patient engagement preference tool, such as the PPET13, can help inform the delivery of individualized engagement strategies to improve patient and family engagement and outcomes; however, nurses need formalized education on how to tailor their care to meet the individual engagement preferences of their patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34116548
doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000526
pii: 00006199-900000000-99663
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
366-375Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.
Références
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2017, June). Elixhauser comorbidity software, Version 3.7. https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/toolssoftware/comorbidity/comorbidity.jsp
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2019, November 27). Strategies for patient, family and caregiver engagement. https://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/family-engagement
Benjamini Y., Hockberg Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 57, 289–300. 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
Blaum C. S., Rosen J., Naik A. D., Smith C. D., Dindo L., Vo L., Hernandez-Bigos K., Esterson J., Geda M., Ferris R., Costello D., Acampora D., Meehan T., Tinetti M. E. (2018). Feasibility of implementing patient priorities care for older adults with multiple chronic conditions. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 66, 2009–2016. 10.1111/jgs.15465
doi: 10.1111/jgs.15465
Bombard Y., Baker G. R., Orlando E., Fancott C., Bhatia P., Casalino S., Onate K., Denis J.-L., Pomey M.-P. (2018). Engaging patients to improve quality of care: A systematic review. Implementation Science, 13, 98. 10.1186/s13012-018-0784-z
doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0784-z
Boyd C. M., Wolff J. L., Giovannetti E., Reider L., Weiss C., Xue Q.-L., Leff B., Boult C., Hughes T., Rand C. (2014). Healthcare task difficulty among older adults with multimorbidity. Medical Care, 52, S118–S125. 10.1097/mlr.0b013e3182a977da
doi: 10.1097/mlr.0b013e3182a977da
Burman M. E., Robinson B., Hart A. M. (2013). Linking evidence-based nursing practice and patient-centered care through patient preferences. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 37, 231–241. 10.1097/naq.0b013e318295ed6b
doi: 10.1097/naq.0b013e318295ed6b
Carman K. L., Dardess P., Maurer M., Sofaer S., Adams K., Bechtel C., Sweeney J. (2013). Patient and family engagement: A framework for understanding the elements and developing interventions and policies. Health Affairs, 32, 223–231. 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1133
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1133
Coulter A., Ellins J. (2007). Effectiveness of strategies for informing, educating, and involving patients. BMJ, 335, 24–27. 10.1136/bmj.39246.581169.80
doi: 10.1136/bmj.39246.581169.80
Cronin R. M., Dorner T. L., Utrankar A., Allen W., Rodeghier M., Kassim A. A., Jackson G. P., DeBaun M. R. (2019). Increased patient activation is associated with fewer emergency room visits and hospitalizations for pain in adults with sickle cell disease. Pain Medicine, 20, 1464–1471. 10.1093/pm/pny194
doi: 10.1093/pm/pny194
Drenkard K., Swartwout E., Deyo P., O’Neil M. B. Jr. (2015). Interactive care model: A framework for more fully engaging people in their healthcare. JONA: Journal of Nursing Administration, 45, 503–510. 10.1097/nna.0000000000000242
doi: 10.1097/nna.0000000000000242
Dykes P. C., Burns Z., Adelman J., Benneyan J., Bogaisky M., Carter E., Ergai A., Lindros M. E., Lipsitz S. R., Scanlan M., Shaykevich S., Bates D. W. (2020). Evaluation of a patient-centered fall-prevention tool kit to reduce falls and injuries: A nonrandomized controlled trial. JAMA Network Open, 3, e2025889. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.25889
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.25889
Elo S., Kääriäinen M., Kanste O., Pölkki T., Utriainen K., Kyngäs H. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: A focus on trustworthiness. SAGE Open, 4, 2158244014522633. 10.1177/2158244014522633
doi: 10.1177/2158244014522633
Ferguson C. J. (2009). An effect size primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40, 532–538. 10.1037/a0015808
doi: 10.1037/a0015808
Florin J., Ehrenberg A., Ehnfors M. (2008). Clinical decision-making: Predictors of patient participation in nursing care. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 17, 2935–2944. 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02328.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02328.x
Graham J. M. (2006). Congeneric and (essentially) tau-equivalent estimates of score reliability: What they are and how to use them. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 930–944. 10.1177/0013164406288165
doi: 10.1177/0013164406288165
Hawley S. T., Morris A. M. (2017). Cultural challenges to engaging patients in shared decision making. Patient Education and Counseling, 100, 18–24. 10.1016/j.pec.2016.07.008
doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.07.008
Human Services Research Institute. (2005). Toolkit on translating and adapting instruments. https://www.hsri.org/files/ uploads/publications/PN54_Translating_and_Adapting.pdf
Jerofke-Owen T. A., Dahlman J. (2019). Patients’ perspectives on engaging in their healthcare while hospitalised. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 28, 340–350. 10.1111/jocn.14639
doi: 10.1111/jocn.14639
Jerofke-Owen T. A., Garnier-Villarreal M. (2020). Development and psychometric analysis of the Patient Preferences for Engagement Tool. Nursing Research, 69, 289–298. 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000423
doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000423
Jerofke-Owen T. A., Garnier-Villareal M., Fial A., Tobiano G. (2020). Systematic review of psychometric properties of instruments measuring patient preferences for engagement in health care. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 76, 1988–2004. 10.1111/jan.14402
doi: 10.1111/jan.14402
Krueger R. A., Casey M. A. (2014). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (5th ed.). Sage.
Kuntz J. L., Safford M. M., Singh J. A., Phansalkar S., Slight S. P., Her Q. L., Lapointe N. A., Mathews R., O’Brien E., Brinkman W. B., Hommel K., Farmer K. C., Klinger E., Maniam N., Sobko H. J., Bailey S. C., Cho I., Rumptz M. H., Vandermeer M. L., Hornbrook M. C. (2014). Patient-centered interventions to improve medication management and adherence: A qualitative review of research findings. Patient Education and Counseling, 97, 310–326. 10.1016/j.pec.2014.08.021
doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.08.021
Lilleheie I., Debesay J., Bye A., Bergland A. (2019). Experiences of elderly patients regarding participation in their hospital discharge: A qualitative metasummary. BMJ Open, 9, e025789. 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025789
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025789
Lindhiem O., Bennett C. B., Trentacosta C. J., McLear C. (2014). Client preferences affect treatment satisfaction, completion, and clinical outcome: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 34, 506–517. 10.1016/j.cpr.2014.06.002
doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2014.06.002
Little R. J. A. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 1198–1202. 10.1080/01621459.1988.10478722
doi: 10.1080/01621459.1988.10478722
McCaffrey D. F., Ridgeway G., Morral A. R. (2004). Propensity score estimation with boosted regression for evaluating causal effects in observational studies. Psychological Methods, 9, 403–425. 10.1037/1082-989X.9.4.403
doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.9.4.403
McDonald R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified approach. Erlbaum.
Royston P., White I. R. (2011). Multiple imputation by chained equations (MICE): Implementation in Stata. Journal of Statistical Software, 45, 1–20.
Samra H. A., McGrath J. M., Fischer S., Schumacher B., Dutcher J., Hansen J. (2015). The NICU parent risk evaluation and engagement model and instrument (PREEMI) for neonates in intensive care units. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, 44, 114–126. 10.1111/1552-6909.12535
doi: 10.1111/1552-6909.12535
Schmiedhofer M., Möckel M., Slagman A., Frick J., Ruhla S., Searle J. (2016). Patient motives behind low-acuity visits to the emergency department in Germany: A qualitative study comparing urban and rural sites. BMJ Open, 6, e013323. 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013323
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013323
Selman L. E., Daveson B. A., Smith M., Johnston B., Ryan K., Morrison R. S., Pannell C., McQuillan R., de Wolf-Linder S., Pantilat S. Z., Klass L., Meier D., Normand C., Higginson I. J. (2017). How empowering is hospital care for older people with advanced disease? Barriers and facilitators from a cross-national ethnography in England, Ireland and the USA. Age and Ageing, 46, 300–309. 10.1093/ageing/afw193
doi: 10.1093/ageing/afw193
Swartwout E., Drenkard K., McGuinn K., Grant S., El-Zein A. (2016). Patient and family engagement summit. JONA: Journal of Nursing Administration, 46, S11–S18. 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000317
doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000317
Tinetti M. E., Esterson J., Ferris R., Posner P., Blaum C. S. (2016). Patient priority-directed decision making and care for older adults with multiple chronic conditions. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine, 32, 261–275. 10.1016/j.cger.2016.01.012
doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2016.01.012
Tobiano G., Jerofke-Owen T., Marshall A. P. (2020). Promoting patient engagement: A scoping review of actions that align with the interactive care model. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences. 10.1111/scs.12914
doi: 10.1111/scs.12914
Tobiano G., Marshall A., Bucknall T., Chaboyer W. (2015). Patient participation in nursing care on medical wards: An integrative review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 52, 1107–1120. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.02.010
doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.02.010
Tzelepis F., Sanson-Fisher R. W., Zucca A. C., Fradgley E. A. (2015). Measuring the quality of patient-centered care: Why patient-reported measures are critical to reliable assessment. Patient Preference and Adherence, 9, 831–835. 10.2147/PPA.S81975
doi: 10.2147/PPA.S81975
Weingart S. N., Zhu J., Chiappetta L., Stuver S. O., Schneider E. C., Epstein A. M., David-Kasdan J. A., Annas C. L., Fowler F. J. Jr., Weissman J. S. (2011). Hospitalized patients’ participation and its impact on quality of care and patient safety. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 23, 269–277. 10.1093/intqhc/mzr002
doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzr002
World Health Organization. (2016). Patient engagement: Technical series on patient engagement. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/252269/9789241511629-eng.pdf;sequence=1