Factors contributing to emotional distress in Sierra Leone: a socio-ecological analysis.

Freelisting Mental health Psychosocial Qualitative Sierra Leone Socio-ecological

Journal

International journal of mental health systems
ISSN: 1752-4458
Titre abrégé: Int J Ment Health Syst
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101294224

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 Jun 2021
Historique:
received: 15 12 2020
accepted: 19 05 2021
entrez: 12 6 2021
pubmed: 13 6 2021
medline: 13 6 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

There is increasing global evidence that mental health is strongly determined by social, economic and environmental factors, and that strategic action in these areas has considerable potential for improving mental health and preventing and alleviating mental disorders. Prevention and promotion activities in mental health must address the needs prioritised by local actors. The aim of this study was to identify stressors with the potential to influence emotional wellbeing and distress within the general population of Sierra Leone, in order to contribute to an inter-sectoral public mental health approach to improving mental health within the country. Respondents were a convenience sample of 153 respondents (60 women, 93 men) from five districts of Sierra Leone. Using freelisting methodology, respondents were asked to respond to the open question 'What kind of problems do women/men have in your community?'. Data analysis involved consolidation of elicited problems into a single list. These were then organised thematically using an adaptation of the socio-ecological model, facilitating exploration of the interactions between problems at individual, family, community and societal levels RESULTS: Overall, respondents located problems predominantly at community and societal levels. Although few respondents identified individual-level issues, they frequently described how problems at other levels contributed to physical health difficulties and emotional distress. Women identified significantly more problems at the family level than men, particularly related to relationships with an intimate partner. Men identified significantly more problems at the societal level than women, primarily related to lack of infrastructure. Men and women were equally focused on problems related to poverty and lack of income generating opportunities. Poverty and inability to earn an income underpinned many of the problems described at individual, family and community level. Actions to address livelihoods, together with improving infrastructure and addressing gender norms which are harmful to both men and women, are likely key to improving the wellbeing of the Sierra Leone population.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
There is increasing global evidence that mental health is strongly determined by social, economic and environmental factors, and that strategic action in these areas has considerable potential for improving mental health and preventing and alleviating mental disorders. Prevention and promotion activities in mental health must address the needs prioritised by local actors. The aim of this study was to identify stressors with the potential to influence emotional wellbeing and distress within the general population of Sierra Leone, in order to contribute to an inter-sectoral public mental health approach to improving mental health within the country.
METHODOLOGY METHODS
Respondents were a convenience sample of 153 respondents (60 women, 93 men) from five districts of Sierra Leone. Using freelisting methodology, respondents were asked to respond to the open question 'What kind of problems do women/men have in your community?'. Data analysis involved consolidation of elicited problems into a single list. These were then organised thematically using an adaptation of the socio-ecological model, facilitating exploration of the interactions between problems at individual, family, community and societal levels RESULTS: Overall, respondents located problems predominantly at community and societal levels. Although few respondents identified individual-level issues, they frequently described how problems at other levels contributed to physical health difficulties and emotional distress. Women identified significantly more problems at the family level than men, particularly related to relationships with an intimate partner. Men identified significantly more problems at the societal level than women, primarily related to lack of infrastructure. Men and women were equally focused on problems related to poverty and lack of income generating opportunities.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Poverty and inability to earn an income underpinned many of the problems described at individual, family and community level. Actions to address livelihoods, together with improving infrastructure and addressing gender norms which are harmful to both men and women, are likely key to improving the wellbeing of the Sierra Leone population.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34116686
doi: 10.1186/s13033-021-00474-y
pii: 10.1186/s13033-021-00474-y
pmc: PMC8193165
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

58

Subventions

Organisme : National Institute for Health Research
ID : 16/136/100

Références

Lancet. 2018 Oct 27;392(10157):1553-1598
pubmed: 30314863
Br J Psychiatry. 2012 Oct;201(4):276-81
pubmed: 22844022
Torture. 2013;23(1):1-14
pubmed: 23831815
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Jul;71(1):71-83
pubmed: 20452111
Transcult Psychiatry. 2009 Jun;46(2):238-56
pubmed: 19541749
Transcult Psychiatry. 2013 Feb;50(1):108-39
pubmed: 23427259
JAMA. 2004 Aug 4;292(5):626-8
pubmed: 15292090
Glob Public Health. 2016;11(1-2):108-21
pubmed: 25996201
Indian J Psychol Med. 2014 Oct;36(4):351-4
pubmed: 25336764
Confl Health. 2020 Jul 10;14:45
pubmed: 32665785
Lancet Psychiatry. 2018 Apr;5(4):357-369
pubmed: 29580610
Global Health. 2020 Mar 30;16(1):28
pubmed: 32228648
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2017 Apr;26(2):139-141
pubmed: 27641739
Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2015 Jul 8;2:e11
pubmed: 28596859
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Jan;70(1):7-16
pubmed: 19854552
Br J Psychiatry. 2012 Oct;201(4):268-75
pubmed: 22878131
Br J Psychiatry. 2015 Feb;206(2):116-21
pubmed: 25497299
Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2020 Jul 29;7:e19
pubmed: 32913658
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2014 Aug;26(4):392-407
pubmed: 25137105
Transcult Psychiatry. 2008 Dec;45(4):611-38
pubmed: 19091728
Confl Health. 2018 Sep 19;12:39
pubmed: 30250500
Br J Psychiatry. 2008 Mar;192(3):171-7
pubmed: 18310574

Auteurs

Rebecca Horn (R)

Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK. Rebecca.r.horn@gmail.com.
NIHR Global Health Research Unit on Health in Situations of Fragility, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK. Rebecca.r.horn@gmail.com.

Stella Arakelyan (S)

Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK.
NIHR Global Health Research Unit on Health in Situations of Fragility, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK.

Haja Wurie (H)

College of Medicine and Allied Health Sciences, University of Sierra Leone, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
NIHR Global Health Research Unit on Health in Situations of Fragility, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK.

Alastair Ager (A)

Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK.
NIHR Global Health Research Unit on Health in Situations of Fragility, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK.

Classifications MeSH