Selecting software pipelines for change in flortaucipir SUVR: Balancing repeatability and group separation.
AV-1451
Bias correction
Change over time
Flortaucipir
GTM
Geometric transfer matrix
Inhomogeneity correction
PVC
Partial volume correction
Precision
RSF
Reference region
Region spread function
SUVR
Tau PET
Journal
NeuroImage
ISSN: 1095-9572
Titre abrégé: Neuroimage
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9215515
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2021
09 2021
Historique:
received:
10
02
2021
revised:
26
05
2021
accepted:
08
06
2021
pubmed:
13
6
2021
medline:
21
10
2021
entrez:
12
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Since tau PET tracers were introduced, investigators have quantified them using a wide variety of automated methods. As longitudinal cohort studies acquire second and third time points of serial within-person tau PET data, determining the best pipeline to measure change has become crucial. We compared a total of 415 different quantification methods (each a combination of multiple options) according to their effects on a) differences in annual SUVR change between clinical groups, and b) longitudinal measurement repeatability as measured by the error term from a linear mixed-effects model. Our comparisons used MRI and Flortaucipir scans of 97 Mayo Clinic study participants who clinically either: a) were cognitively unimpaired, or b) had cognitive impairments that were consistent with Alzheimer's disease pathology. Tested methods included cross-sectional and longitudinal variants of two overarching pipelines (FreeSurfer 6.0, and an in-house pipeline based on SPM12), three choices of target region (entorhinal, inferior temporal, and a temporal lobe meta-ROI), five types of partial volume correction (PVC) (none, two-compartment, three-compartment, geometric transfer matrix (GTM), and a tau-specific GTM variant), seven choices of reference region (cerebellar crus, cerebellar gray matter, whole cerebellum, pons, supratentorial white matter, eroded supratentorial WM, and a composite of eroded supratentorial WM, pons, and whole cerebellum), two choices of region masking (GM or GM and WM), and two choices of statistic (voxel-wise mean vs. median). Our strongest findings were: 1) larger temporal-lobe target regions greatly outperformed entorhinal cortex (median sample size estimates based on a hypothetical clinical trial were 520-526 vs. 1740); 2) longitudinal processing pipelines outperformed cross-sectional pipelines (median sample size estimates were 483 vs. 572); and 3) reference regions including supratentorial WM outperformed traditional cerebellar and pontine options (median sample size estimates were 370 vs. 559). Altogether, our results favored longitudinally SUVR methods and a temporal-lobe meta-ROI that includes adjacent (juxtacortical) WM, a composite reference region (eroded supratentorial WM + pons + whole cerebellum), 2-class voxel-based PVC, and median statistics.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34118395
pii: S1053-8119(21)00536-X
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118259
pmc: PMC8407434
mid: NIHMS1730832
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Carbolines
0
tau Proteins
0
7-(6-fluoropyridin-3-yl)-5H-pyrido(4,3-b)indole
J09QS3Z3WB
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
118259Subventions
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AG041851
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AG068206
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AG034676
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : P50 AG016574
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R56 AG068206
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AG011378
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDCD NIH HHS
ID : R01 DC012519
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R01 NS089757
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : U54 NS092089
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : U01 NS100620
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : U01 AG006786
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AG050603
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R01 NS097495
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : P30 AG062677
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R37 AG011378
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R21 NS094684
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : U01 AG045390
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest Christopher Schwarz receives research support from the NIH. Terry Therneau reports no disclosures. Stephen Weigand reports no disclosures. Jeffrey Gunter reports no disclosures. Val Lowe consults for Bayer Schering Pharma, Piramal Life Sciences, Eisai, Inc., and Merck Research and receives research support from GE Healthcare, Siemens Molecular Imaging, AVID Radiopharmaceuticals and the NIH (NIA, NCI). Scott Przybelski reports no disclosures. Prashanthi Vemuri is funded by the NIH. Matthew Senjem has owned stock in medical related companies, unrelated to the current work within the past 12 months: Align Technology, Inc., Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Inc., LHC Group, Inc., Mesa Laboratories, Inc., Natus Medical Inc., and Varex Imaging Corporation. He has also owned stock in these medical related companies within the past three years, unrelated to the current work: CRISPR Therapeutics, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic, Inc. Hugo Botha is funded by the NIH. Kejal Kantarci serves on the data safety monitoring board for Takeda Global Research and Development Center, Inc., receives research support from Avid Radioparmaceuticals and Eli Lilly, and receives funding from NIH and Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation. Bradley Boeve has served as an investigator for clinical trials sponsored by Axovant and Biogen. He receives royalties from the publication of a book entitled Behavioral Neurology Of Dementia (Cambridge Medicine, 2009, 2017). He serves on the Scientific Advisory Board of the Tau Consortium. He receives research support from the NIH, the Mayo Clinic Dorothy and Harry T. Mangurian Jr. Lewy Body Dementia Program and the Little Family Foundation. Jennifer Whitwell is funded by the NIH. Keith Josephs is funded by the NIH. Ronald Petersen is a consultant for Roche, Inc., Biogen, Inc., and Eisai, Inc., served on a DSMB for Genentech, Inc.; receives royalties from publishing Mild Cognitive Impairment (Oxford University Press, 2003) and UpToDate; and receives research support from the NIH (P30 AG062677 (PI) and U01-AG006786 (PI), R01-AG011378 (Co-I), and U01–024904 (Co-I)). David Knopman serves on a Data Safety Monitoring Board for the DIAN study; is an investigator in clinical trials sponsored by Biogen and Lilly Pharmaceuticals; and receives research support from the NIH. Clifford Jack serves on an independent data monitoring board for Roche, has served as a speaker for Eisai, and consulted for Biogen, but he receives no personal compensation from any commercial entity. He receives research support from NIH and the Alexander Family Alzheimer's Disease Research Professorship of the Mayo Clinic.
Références
Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2016 Jun 13;4(1):58
pubmed: 27296779
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1992 Jul;12(4):571-83
pubmed: 1618936
Phys Med Biol. 2016 Nov 21;61(22):7975-7993
pubmed: 27779136
Neuroimage. 2017 Jan 1;144(Pt A):113-127
pubmed: 27577718
Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 15;62(2):774-81
pubmed: 22248573
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2016 Dec 21;6:21-30
pubmed: 28138510
Acta Neuropathol. 2016 Dec;132(6):931-933
pubmed: 27645292
EMBO Mol Med. 2017 Sep;9(9):1212-1223
pubmed: 28743782
Ann Neurol. 2017 Jan;81(1):117-128
pubmed: 27997036
JAMA. 2018 Sep 18;320(11):1151-1162
pubmed: 30326496
Ann Neurol. 1999 Mar;45(3):358-68
pubmed: 10072051
Brain. 2018 Jan 1;141(1):271-287
pubmed: 29228201
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 11;10(6):e038863
pubmed: 32532786
Data Brief. 2017 Oct 16;15:648-657
pubmed: 29124088
Acta Neuropathol. 1991;82(4):239-59
pubmed: 1759558
Ann Neurol. 2019 Feb;85(2):229-240
pubmed: 30597624
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1990 Jul-Aug;14(4):561-70
pubmed: 2370355
Neuroimage. 2014 May 15;92:225-36
pubmed: 24361666
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2018 Feb 14;10:221-231
pubmed: 29780867
Neuroimage. 2017 Nov 1;161:171-178
pubmed: 28756238
Ann Neurol. 2019 Feb;85(2):181-193
pubmed: 30549303
Alzheimers Dement. 2017 Oct;13(10):1117-1124
pubmed: 28365320
Brain. 2018 May 1;141(5):1517-1528
pubmed: 29538647
Neuroimage. 2010 Feb 1;49(3):2457-66
pubmed: 19818860
JAMA Neurol. 2019 Aug 1;76(8):915-924
pubmed: 31157827
J Nucl Med. 2018 Jun;59(6):937-943
pubmed: 29284675
J Nucl Med. 2019 Apr;60(4):536-540
pubmed: 30190305
Neuroimage. 2012 Jul 16;61(4):1402-18
pubmed: 22430496
Neuroimage. 2021 Feb 1;226:117593
pubmed: 33248259
Neuroepidemiology. 2008;30(1):58-69
pubmed: 18259084
J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;62(4):1691-1702
pubmed: 29614677
Neuroimage. 2015 Jun;113:61-9
pubmed: 25797830
Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 Jul;38(7):3323-3336
pubmed: 28432784
Alzheimers Dement. 2019 Jun;15(6):807-816
pubmed: 31101517
Brain. 2019 Apr 1;142(4):1063-1076
pubmed: 30753379
Semin Nucl Med. 2017 Sep;47(5):553-575
pubmed: 28826526
Neuron. 2016 Mar 2;89(5):971-982
pubmed: 26938442
J Neurosci. 2018 Jan 17;38(3):530-543
pubmed: 29192126
J Nucl Med. 2019 Oct;60(10):1444-1451
pubmed: 30877180
Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2017 Oct 19;5(1):75
pubmed: 29047416
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2020 Dec;40(12):2464-2474
pubmed: 31575335
Neuroimage. 2016 May 15;132:334-343
pubmed: 26915497
J Nucl Med. 2015 Apr;56(4):560-6
pubmed: 25745091
J Nucl Med. 2015 Apr;56(4):567-74
pubmed: 25745095
J Nucl Med. 2018 Jan;59(1):117-120
pubmed: 28775201
Neurology. 2018 Aug 28;91(9):e859-e866
pubmed: 30068637
Brain. 2019 Apr 1;142(4):1148-1160
pubmed: 30759182
Brain. 2017 Mar 1;140(3):748-763
pubmed: 28077397
EJNMMI Res. 2018 Aug 15;8(1):79
pubmed: 30112620
Ann Neurol. 2016 Jan;79(1):110-9
pubmed: 26505746
Neuroimage Clin. 2018 Apr 04;19:182-189
pubmed: 30023168
J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;67(1):181-195
pubmed: 30475770
J Nucl Med. 2018 Jun 14;60(2):285-291
pubmed: 29903930
Phys Med Biol. 2012 Nov 7;57(21):R119-59
pubmed: 23073343
Acta Neuropathol. 2014 Dec;128(6):755-66
pubmed: 25348064
J Nucl Med. 1998 May;39(5):904-11
pubmed: 9591599
Med Image Anal. 2008 Feb;12(1):26-41
pubmed: 17659998
Neuroimage. 2005 Jul 1;26(3):839-51
pubmed: 15955494
Neurobiol Aging. 2018 Dec;72:177-185
pubmed: 30292840
Neuroimage. 2017 Aug 15;157:448-463
pubmed: 28587897
J Nucl Med. 2018 Jun;59(6):944-951
pubmed: 29191858
J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;62(4):1713-1724
pubmed: 29614676
Neurology. 2019 Jul 2;93(1):e29-e39
pubmed: 31147421