Effects of Hip Flexion on Knee Extension and Flexion Isokinetic Angle-Specific Torques and HQ-Ratios.
Concentric
Eccentric
Hamstrings
Quadriceps
Statistical parametric mapping (SPM)
Journal
Sports medicine - open
ISSN: 2199-1170
Titre abrégé: Sports Med Open
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101662568
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 Jun 2021
12 Jun 2021
Historique:
received:
06
07
2020
accepted:
19
05
2021
entrez:
13
6
2021
pubmed:
14
6
2021
medline:
14
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
During isokinetic knee strength testing, the knee flexion angles that correspond to the measured torque values are rarely considered. Additionally, the hip flexion angle during seated testing diverges from that in the majority of daily life and sporting activities. Limited information concerning the influence of hip angle, muscle contraction mode, and velocity on the isokinetic knee strength over the entire range of motion (ROM) is available. Twenty recreational athletes (10 females, 10 males; 23.3 ± 3.2 years; 72.1 ± 16.5 kg; 1.78 ± 0.07 m) were tested for isokinetic knee flexion and extension at 10° and 90° hip flexion with the following conditions: (i) concentric at 60°/s, (ii) concentric at 180°/s, and (iii) eccentric at 60°/s. The effects of hip angle, contraction mode, and velocity on angle-specific torques and HQ-ratios as well as conventional parameters (peak torques, angles at peak torque, and HQ-ratios) were analyzed using statistical parametric mapping and parametric ANOVAs, respectively. Generally, the angle-specific and conventional torques and HQ-ratios were lower in the extended hip compared to a flexed hip joint. Thereby, in comparison to the knee extension, the torque values decreased to a greater extent during knee flexion but not consistent over the entire ROM. The torque values were greater at the lower velocity and eccentric mode, but the influence of the velocity and contraction mode were lower at shorter and greater muscle lengths, respectively. Isokinetic knee strength is influenced by the hip flexion angle. Therefore, a seated position during testing and training is questionable, because the hip joint is rarely flexed at 90° during daily life and sporting activities. Maximum knee strength is lower in supine position, which should be considered for training and testing. The angle-specific effects cannot be mirrored by the conventional parameters. Therefore, angle-specific analyses are recommended to obtain supplemental information and consequently to improve knee strength testing.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND METHODS
METHODS
During isokinetic knee strength testing, the knee flexion angles that correspond to the measured torque values are rarely considered. Additionally, the hip flexion angle during seated testing diverges from that in the majority of daily life and sporting activities. Limited information concerning the influence of hip angle, muscle contraction mode, and velocity on the isokinetic knee strength over the entire range of motion (ROM) is available. Twenty recreational athletes (10 females, 10 males; 23.3 ± 3.2 years; 72.1 ± 16.5 kg; 1.78 ± 0.07 m) were tested for isokinetic knee flexion and extension at 10° and 90° hip flexion with the following conditions: (i) concentric at 60°/s, (ii) concentric at 180°/s, and (iii) eccentric at 60°/s. The effects of hip angle, contraction mode, and velocity on angle-specific torques and HQ-ratios as well as conventional parameters (peak torques, angles at peak torque, and HQ-ratios) were analyzed using statistical parametric mapping and parametric ANOVAs, respectively.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Generally, the angle-specific and conventional torques and HQ-ratios were lower in the extended hip compared to a flexed hip joint. Thereby, in comparison to the knee extension, the torque values decreased to a greater extent during knee flexion but not consistent over the entire ROM. The torque values were greater at the lower velocity and eccentric mode, but the influence of the velocity and contraction mode were lower at shorter and greater muscle lengths, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Isokinetic knee strength is influenced by the hip flexion angle. Therefore, a seated position during testing and training is questionable, because the hip joint is rarely flexed at 90° during daily life and sporting activities. Maximum knee strength is lower in supine position, which should be considered for training and testing. The angle-specific effects cannot be mirrored by the conventional parameters. Therefore, angle-specific analyses are recommended to obtain supplemental information and consequently to improve knee strength testing.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34120217
doi: 10.1186/s40798-021-00330-w
pii: 10.1186/s40798-021-00330-w
pmc: PMC8197694
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
41Références
Br J Sports Med. 2015 Oct;49(20):1305-10
pubmed: 26105017
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1988;9(8):287-91
pubmed: 18796996
Br J Sports Med. 2003 Apr;37(2):182-4
pubmed: 12663365
J Athl Train. 2012 Jul-Aug;47(4):390-5
pubmed: 22889654
Sports Med Open. 2019 Mar 25;5(1):11
pubmed: 30911856
Sports Health. 2015 May;7(3):231-8
pubmed: 26131300
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Sep;43(9):2242-9
pubmed: 26183172
Br J Sports Med. 2016 Aug;50(15):946-51
pubmed: 27215935
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 May;19(5):768-80
pubmed: 21234542
Sports Med. 2018 Mar;48(3):513-524
pubmed: 29143267
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2018 Dec 6;10:23
pubmed: 30534382
Front Physiol. 2015 Jun 10;6:174
pubmed: 26113821
J Biomech. 2013 Sep 27;46(14):2394-401
pubmed: 23948374
Phys Ther. 1986 Jul;66(7):1083-6
pubmed: 3725894
Acta Physiol Scand. 1995 Aug;154(4):421-7
pubmed: 7484168
J Biomech. 2015 May 1;48(7):1277-85
pubmed: 25817475
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2017 Dec;37:141-146
pubmed: 29101912
J Sci Med Sport. 2018 Oct;21(10):1100-1105
pubmed: 29650339
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1989;11(3):104-7
pubmed: 18796923
Front Physiol. 2016 Aug 03;7:340
pubmed: 27536252
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009 Jul;17(7):705-29
pubmed: 19452139
Am J Sports Med. 2010 Mar;38(3):586-93
pubmed: 20110458
J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Jul;26(7):1959-66
pubmed: 21912292
Br J Sports Med. 2016 Jul;50(13):804-8
pubmed: 27162233
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2018 Jul;22(3):766-779
pubmed: 30100311
Am J Sports Med. 1998 Mar-Apr;26(2):231-7
pubmed: 9548116
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 May;22(5):1163-74
pubmed: 23812438
Clin J Sport Med. 2004 Sep;14(5):274-80
pubmed: 15377966
Sports Med. 2013 Dec;43(12):1207-15
pubmed: 24062275
Sports (Basel). 2019 Feb 15;7(2):
pubmed: 30781438