Do hip-abduction braces work?-A biomechanical evaluation of a commercially available hip brace.
Arthrodesis cushion
Hip brace
Hip dislocation
Inertial sensors
Total hip arthroplasty
Journal
Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery
ISSN: 1434-3916
Titre abrégé: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9011043
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2022
Jun 2022
Historique:
received:
31
07
2020
accepted:
28
05
2021
pubmed:
14
6
2021
medline:
19
5
2022
entrez:
13
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Dislocations of the hip joint are a common and clinically relevant complication following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Hip-abduction braces are currently used following operative or non-operative treatment of THA dislocations to prevent re-dislocations. However, the clinical and biomechanical effectiveness of such braces is still controversial. A total of 30 volunteers were measured during standing and during sitting up and down from a chair task wearing a hip brace set at 70°, 90° or no hip flexion limitation. Range of motion of the hip joint was measured in all directions by an inertial sensor system. Further it has been evaluated if the range of motion would be reduced by the additional use of an arthrodesis cushion. The use of a hip brace set up with flexion limitation did reduce hip ROM in all directions significantly compared to unhinged brace (p < 0.001-0.035). Performing the "sit down and stand-up task" the brace set up at 70° flexion limitation did reduce maximum hip flexion significantly (p = 0.008). However, in most cases the measured hip flexion angles were greater than the settings of the hip brace should have allowed. The additional use of a cushion can further limit hip motion while sitting up and down from a chair. This study has demonstrated that hip-abduction braces reduce hip range of motion. However, we also found that to achieve a flexion limitation of the hip to 90°, the hip brace should be set at a 70° hip flexion limitation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34120237
doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03989-8
pii: 10.1007/s00402-021-03989-8
pmc: PMC9110475
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1275-1281Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
J Arthroplasty. 2018 May;33(5):1567-1571.e2
pubmed: 29395718
J Biomech. 2003 Apr;36(4):577-91
pubmed: 12600348
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Feb 17;103(4):295-302
pubmed: 33347013
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978 Mar;60(2):217-20
pubmed: 641088
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983 Mar;(173):151-8
pubmed: 6825326
J Arthroplasty. 2012 Sep;27(8 Suppl):126-9
pubmed: 22608688
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1985 May;67(3):402-5
pubmed: 3997949
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2013;47(2):96-103
pubmed: 23619542
Orthopade. 2014 Nov;43(11):984-7
pubmed: 25331500
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2019 Jan;42(1):75-81
pubmed: 31054596
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 04;7:CD010815
pubmed: 27374001
J Arthroplasty. 2004 Sep;19(6):733-8
pubmed: 15343533
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976 Nov-Dec;(121):92-4
pubmed: 991523
Bone Joint J. 2013 Nov;95-B(11 Suppl A):67-9
pubmed: 24187356
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1997 Jan-Feb;135(1):40-4
pubmed: 9199072
Hip Int. 2012 Sep-Oct;22(5):500-4
pubmed: 23100149
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2014 Dec 22;111(51-52):884-90
pubmed: 25597367
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Nov;87(11):2456-63
pubmed: 16264121
Clin J Sport Med. 1995;5(1):18-24
pubmed: 7614076
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Jun;447:19-23
pubmed: 16741469