Conservative versus tailored surgical treatment in patients with first time lateral patella dislocation: a randomized-controlled trial.


Journal

Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research
ISSN: 1749-799X
Titre abrégé: J Orthop Surg Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101265112

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
13 Jun 2021
Historique:
received: 30 03 2021
accepted: 01 06 2021
entrez: 14 6 2021
pubmed: 15 6 2021
medline: 5 11 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Patellar instability has a high incidence and occurs particularly in young and female patients. If the patella dislocates for the first time, treatment is usually conservative. However, this cautious approach carries the risk of recurrence and of secondary pathologies such as osteochondral fractures. Moreover, there is also risk of continuous symptoms apparent, as recurrent patella dislocation is related to patellofemoral osteoarthritis as well. An initial surgical treatment could possibly avoid these consequences of recurrent patella dislocation. A prospective, randomized-controlled trial design is applied. Patients with unilateral first-time patella dislocation will be considered for participation. Study participants will be randomized to either conservative treatment or to a tailored patella stabilizing treatment. In the conservative group, patients will use a knee brace and will be prescribed outpatient physical therapy. The surgical treatment will be performed in a tailored manner, addressing the pathologic anatomy that predisposes to patella dislocation. The Banff Patellofemoral Instability-Instrument 2.0, recurrence rate, apprehension test, joint degeneration, and the Patella Instability Severity Score will serve as outcome parameters. The main analysis will focus on the difference in change of the scores between the two groups within a 2-year follow-up. Statistical analysis will use linear mixed models. Power analysis was done for the comparison of the two study arms at 2-year follow-up with regard to the BPII Score. A sample size of N = 64 per study arm (128 overall) provides 80% power (alpha = 0.05, two-tailed) to detect a difference of 0.5 standard deviations in a t-test for independent samples. Although several studies have already dealt with this issue, there is still no consensus on the ideal treatment concept for primary patellar dislocation. Moreover, most of these studies show a unified surgical group, which means that all patients were treated with the same surgical procedure. This is regarded as a major limitation as surgical treatment of patella dislocation should depend on the patient's anatomic pathologies leading to patellar instability. To our knowledge, this is the first study investigating whether patients with primary patella dislocation are better treated conservatively or operatively with tailored surgery to stabilize the patella. The study will be prospectively registered in the publicly accessible database www.ClinicalTrials.gov .

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Patellar instability has a high incidence and occurs particularly in young and female patients. If the patella dislocates for the first time, treatment is usually conservative. However, this cautious approach carries the risk of recurrence and of secondary pathologies such as osteochondral fractures. Moreover, there is also risk of continuous symptoms apparent, as recurrent patella dislocation is related to patellofemoral osteoarthritis as well. An initial surgical treatment could possibly avoid these consequences of recurrent patella dislocation.
METHODS METHODS
A prospective, randomized-controlled trial design is applied. Patients with unilateral first-time patella dislocation will be considered for participation. Study participants will be randomized to either conservative treatment or to a tailored patella stabilizing treatment. In the conservative group, patients will use a knee brace and will be prescribed outpatient physical therapy. The surgical treatment will be performed in a tailored manner, addressing the pathologic anatomy that predisposes to patella dislocation. The Banff Patellofemoral Instability-Instrument 2.0, recurrence rate, apprehension test, joint degeneration, and the Patella Instability Severity Score will serve as outcome parameters. The main analysis will focus on the difference in change of the scores between the two groups within a 2-year follow-up. Statistical analysis will use linear mixed models. Power analysis was done for the comparison of the two study arms at 2-year follow-up with regard to the BPII Score. A sample size of N = 64 per study arm (128 overall) provides 80% power (alpha = 0.05, two-tailed) to detect a difference of 0.5 standard deviations in a t-test for independent samples.
DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONS
Although several studies have already dealt with this issue, there is still no consensus on the ideal treatment concept for primary patellar dislocation. Moreover, most of these studies show a unified surgical group, which means that all patients were treated with the same surgical procedure. This is regarded as a major limitation as surgical treatment of patella dislocation should depend on the patient's anatomic pathologies leading to patellar instability. To our knowledge, this is the first study investigating whether patients with primary patella dislocation are better treated conservatively or operatively with tailored surgery to stabilize the patella.
TRIAL REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
The study will be prospectively registered in the publicly accessible database www.ClinicalTrials.gov .

Identifiants

pubmed: 34120628
doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02513-3
pii: 10.1186/s13018-021-02513-3
pmc: PMC8199830
doi:

Substances chimiques

Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals 0

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

378

Références

J Orthop Res. 2015 Mar;33(3):318-24
pubmed: 25399673
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Feb;90(2):180-5
pubmed: 18256084
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2014 Sep;10(3):306-13
pubmed: 24740585
Arthroscopy. 1993;9(2):159-63
pubmed: 8461073
Knee. 2006 Dec;13(6):464-8
pubmed: 17011193
Knee. 2016 Aug;23(4):708-11
pubmed: 27180253
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002 Aug;84(6):861-4
pubmed: 12211679
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Oct;22(10):2484-90
pubmed: 23370988
Arthroscopy. 2016 May;32(5):929-43
pubmed: 26921127
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012 Mar;132(3):289-98
pubmed: 21479863
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Aug;44(8):2081-6
pubmed: 27166290
Am J Sports Med. 2012 Feb;40(2):346-51
pubmed: 22109545
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Nov;22(11):2591-8
pubmed: 23851967
Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Jun 22;8(6):2325967120926178
pubmed: 32613021
Am J Sports Med. 2001 Mar-Apr;29(2):213-8
pubmed: 11292048
Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2017 May 10;7(1):1-10
pubmed: 28717605
Med Care. 1996 Mar;34(3):220-33
pubmed: 8628042
Arthroscopy. 2008 Jan;24(1):77-81
pubmed: 18182206
Orthop J Sports Med. 2016 May 11;4(5):2325967116646085
pubmed: 27231700
Knee. 2001 Dec;8(4):287-92
pubmed: 11706691
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 Feb;21(2):318-24
pubmed: 22538501
Int J Legal Med. 2014 May;128(3):509-14
pubmed: 24504560
Int Orthop. 2015 Dec;39(12):2355-62
pubmed: 26156717
Am J Sports Med. 2013 May;41(5):998-1004
pubmed: 23589587
Am J Sports Med. 2009 Sep;37(9):1735-42
pubmed: 19470945
J Pediatr Orthop. 2004 Jul-Aug;24(4):392-6
pubmed: 15205621
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 May;85(5):815-22
pubmed: 15129407
Int Orthop. 2013 Mar;37(3):433-9
pubmed: 23275080
Am J Sports Med. 2013 May;41(5):1005-12
pubmed: 23467555
Arthroscopy. 2015 Jul;31(7):1372-80
pubmed: 25703288
Int Orthop. 2011 Oct;35(10):1483-7
pubmed: 21574051
J Pediatr Orthop. 1996 Jul-Aug;16(4):484-8
pubmed: 8784702
Arthroscopy. 2009 Jun;25(6):620-5
pubmed: 19501292
Am J Sports Med. 2012 Jan;40(1):114-22
pubmed: 22016458
J Knee Surg. 2020 May;33(5):504-512
pubmed: 30822786
Arthroscopy. 2008 Aug;24(8):881-7
pubmed: 18657736
Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2015 Dec;27(6):505-24
pubmed: 26589306
Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2014 Apr;9(1):5-12
pubmed: 24338661
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Feb;91(2):263-73
pubmed: 19181969
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Jun;46(7):1632-1640
pubmed: 29688749
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2005 Mar;35(3):136-46
pubmed: 15839307
Int Orthop. 2010 Feb;34(2):305-9
pubmed: 20066411
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Mar;24(3):873-8
pubmed: 25358690
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011 Aug;19(8):990-1002
pubmed: 21645627
Am J Sports Med. 2012 Aug;40(8):1916-23
pubmed: 22679297
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011 Dec;97(8):833-45
pubmed: 22112463
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Mar;42(3):716-22
pubmed: 24458241
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Apr 6;16(1):239
pubmed: 33823887
Med Care. 2003 May;41(5):582-92
pubmed: 12719681
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013 Feb;133(2):209-13
pubmed: 23138693
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Oct;22(10):2545-50
pubmed: 23392290
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Sep;26(9):2679-2684
pubmed: 28785790
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Oct;22(10):2308-14
pubmed: 24005331
Am J Sports Med. 2017 May;45(6):1376-1382
pubmed: 28298062
Orthop J Sports Med. 2014 Aug 08;2(8):2325967114544021
pubmed: 26535352
Am J Sports Med. 2021 Mar;49(4):970-974
pubmed: 33595335
Am J Sports Med. 2008 Dec;36(12):2301-9
pubmed: 18762668

Auteurs

M Liebensteiner (M)

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.

A Keiler (A)

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria. alexander.keiler@i-med.ac.at.

R El Attal (R)

Landeskrankenhaus Feldkirch, Carinagasse 41, 6800, Feldkirch, Austria.

P Balcarek (P)

ARCUS Sportklinik, Rastatter Str. 17-19, 75179, Pforzheim, Germany.

F Dirisamer (F)

Orthopädie & Sportchirurgie, Karl-Leitl-Str. 1, 4048, Linz, Puchenau, Austria.
OSMI - Research Unit for Orthopaedic Sports Medicine and Injury Prevention, UMIT - Private University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Eduard-Wallnöfer-Zentrum 1, 6060, Hall in Tirol, Austria.

J Giesinger (J)

University Hospital of Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.

G Seitlinger (G)

Orthofocus, Guggenbichlerstr. 20, 5026, Salzburg, Austria.

M Nelitz (M)

MVZ Oberstdorf, Kliniken Kempten/Oberallgäu, Trettachstr. 16, 87561, Oberstdorf, Germany.

A Keshmiri (A)

MVZ im Helios, Helene-Weber-Allee 19, 80637, Munich, Germany.

J Frings (J)

Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

Ch Becher (C)

International Center for Orthopaedics, ATOS Clinic, Bismarckstr. 9-15, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany.

P Kappel (P)

Department of Orthopaedics, Trauma Surgery and Sports Medicine, Cologne Merheim Medical Center, University of Witten/Herdecke, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany.

D Wagner (D)

Hessingpark-Clinic GmbH, Hessingstr. 17, 86199, Augsburg, Germany.

G Pagenstert (G)

CLARAHOF Orthopaedics, Merian-Iselin-Hospital - Swiss Olympic Medical Center, Clarahofweg 19a, 4058, Basel, Switzerland.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH