Association between obligatory anaerobes and empyema caused by Streptococcus anginosus group bacteria.
16S ribosomal RNA gene
Clone library method
Empyema
Obligate anaerobe
Streptococcus anginosus group
Journal
Respiratory investigation
ISSN: 2212-5353
Titre abrégé: Respir Investig
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101581124
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2021
Sep 2021
Historique:
received:
07
09
2020
revised:
20
04
2021
accepted:
25
04
2021
pubmed:
15
6
2021
medline:
26
10
2021
entrez:
14
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Co-infections of Streptococcus anginosus group (SAG) bacteria and obligate anaerobes are observed in patients with empyema; however, their epidemiology and pathology remain unknown. A retrospective study was performed with 44 patients who underwent pleural effusion microbiota evaluation between January 2006 and March 2018, using the clone library method for detecting empyema caused by SAG bacteria. Based on culture analysis of pleural effusion, 12 patients were diagnosed with empyema caused by SAG bacteria. Obligate anaerobe phylotypes were detected in eight patients (66.7%) using the clone library method, whereas anaerobic culture analysis detected anaerobes in only two patients (16.7%). No significant difference was observed between the clinical features of SAG-mediated empyema with and without anaerobes using the clone library method, except for chest computed tomographic data. Co-infection of SAG bacteria and obligate anaerobes may be underestimated if conventional culture methods are used. SAG-mediated empyema with and without anaerobes may present different radiological features; therefore, further studies are required.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34120847
pii: S2212-5345(21)00079-4
doi: 10.1016/j.resinv.2021.04.009
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
686-690Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 The Japanese Respiratory Society. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of Interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest.