Efficacy of hemostatic powders in lower gastrointestinal bleeding: Clinical series and literature review.


Journal

Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver
ISSN: 1878-3562
Titre abrégé: Dig Liver Dis
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 100958385

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2021
Historique:
received: 04 03 2021
revised: 12 04 2021
accepted: 17 05 2021
pubmed: 15 6 2021
medline: 5 2 2022
entrez: 14 6 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

There is limited evidence on the efficacy of hemostatic powders in the management of lower gastrointestinal bleeding. to revise our series of patients with lower gastrointestinal bleeding treated with hemostatic powders and to provide a pooled estimate of their efficacy based on the current literature. Sixty-five patients underwent topical endoscopic application of hemostatic powder between 2016 and 2020. The primary endpoint was treatment success, with 7- and 30-day rebleeding rate, adverse events and mortality as secondary outcomes. Literature review was based on computerized bibliographic search on the main databases through December 2020. Pooled effects were calculated using a random-effects model. Overall, the powder was applied as monotherapy in 37 patients (56.9%), as combination therapy in 15 patients (23.4%), and as rescue therapy in 13 cases (19.9%). Hemostasis was achieved in 100% of patients. Rebleeding rate at 7- and 30-day was 7.7% and 9.2%, respectively. A total of 10 studies with 259 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Immediate hemostasis was achieved in 96.3% (93.4%-99.2%) patients, whereas pooled 7- and 30-day rebleeding rates were 9.6% (4.5%-14.6%) and 12.9% (7.2%-18.5%), respectively. Novel hemostatic powders represent a user-friendly and effective tool in the management of lower gastrointestinal bleeding.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
There is limited evidence on the efficacy of hemostatic powders in the management of lower gastrointestinal bleeding.
AIMS OBJECTIVE
to revise our series of patients with lower gastrointestinal bleeding treated with hemostatic powders and to provide a pooled estimate of their efficacy based on the current literature.
METHODS METHODS
Sixty-five patients underwent topical endoscopic application of hemostatic powder between 2016 and 2020. The primary endpoint was treatment success, with 7- and 30-day rebleeding rate, adverse events and mortality as secondary outcomes. Literature review was based on computerized bibliographic search on the main databases through December 2020. Pooled effects were calculated using a random-effects model.
RESULTS RESULTS
Overall, the powder was applied as monotherapy in 37 patients (56.9%), as combination therapy in 15 patients (23.4%), and as rescue therapy in 13 cases (19.9%). Hemostasis was achieved in 100% of patients. Rebleeding rate at 7- and 30-day was 7.7% and 9.2%, respectively. A total of 10 studies with 259 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Immediate hemostasis was achieved in 96.3% (93.4%-99.2%) patients, whereas pooled 7- and 30-day rebleeding rates were 9.6% (4.5%-14.6%) and 12.9% (7.2%-18.5%), respectively.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Novel hemostatic powders represent a user-friendly and effective tool in the management of lower gastrointestinal bleeding.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34120857
pii: S1590-8658(21)00277-2
doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2021.05.026
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Hemostatics 0
Powders 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1327-1333

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest None.

Auteurs

Antonio Facciorusso (A)

Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Italy. Electronic address: antonio.facciorusso@virgilio.it.

Marco Bertini (M)

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Department of Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy.

Michele Bertoni (M)

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Department of Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy.

Nicola Tartaglia (N)

General Surgery Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Italy.

Mario Pacilli (M)

General Surgery Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Italy.

Giovanna Pavone (G)

General Surgery Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Italy.

Antonio Ambrosi (A)

General Surgery Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Italy.

Rodolfo Sacco (R)

Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Italy.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH