Mono- and poly-therapy with benzodiazepines or Z-drugs: Results from a tertiary-care Addiction Unit study.

Mono-therapy Z-drug benzodiazepine poly-pharmacy poly-therapy substance use disorder

Journal

The International journal of risk & safety in medicine
ISSN: 1878-6847
Titre abrégé: Int J Risk Saf Med
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9100907

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Historique:
pubmed: 15 6 2021
medline: 11 11 2021
entrez: 14 6 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Using benzodiazepines (BZDs) or Z-drugs in poly-therapy is a critical issue. Identifying factors influencing the use of BZDs/Z-drugs in poly- vs mono-therapy in patients with or without substance use disorders (SUDs). 986 inpatients were analysed. Socio-demographic and clinical variables were collected. BZD/Z-drug doses were compared via the Defined Daily Dose (DDD) and standardized as diazepam dose equivalents. Mann-Whitney, Chi-square, Fisher test, hierarchical multivariate regression analyses were run referring to the whole sample and to subjects with current SUDs, lifetime SUDs, current and lifetime SUDs, non-SUDs. In the whole sample the variance of being mono- vs poly-therapy users was explained by BZD/Z-drug formulation, DDD, duration of treatment, age of first BZDs/Z-drugs use (ΔR2 = 0.141, p < 0.001). Among those with current SUDs (ΔR2 = 0.278, p = 0.332) or current and lifetime SUDs (ΔR2 = 0.154, p = 0.419), no variables explained the variance of being mono-vs poly-therapy users. Among lifetime SUDs subjects, the variance of being mono- vs poly-therapy users was explained by BZD/Z-drug formulation and age of first BZD/Z-drug use (ΔR2 = 0.275, p < 0.001). Among non-SUDs subjects, the variance of being mono- vs poly-therapy users was explained by DDD and duration of treatment (ΔR2 = 0.162, p = 0.001). Tablets, high drug doses, long duration of treatment, and early age of first use were more likely associated to poly- than mono-therapy. This suggests that patients have different clinical features and a pharmacological prescription should be tailored to them also based on the variables here analysed.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Using benzodiazepines (BZDs) or Z-drugs in poly-therapy is a critical issue.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
Identifying factors influencing the use of BZDs/Z-drugs in poly- vs mono-therapy in patients with or without substance use disorders (SUDs).
METHODS METHODS
986 inpatients were analysed. Socio-demographic and clinical variables were collected. BZD/Z-drug doses were compared via the Defined Daily Dose (DDD) and standardized as diazepam dose equivalents. Mann-Whitney, Chi-square, Fisher test, hierarchical multivariate regression analyses were run referring to the whole sample and to subjects with current SUDs, lifetime SUDs, current and lifetime SUDs, non-SUDs.
RESULTS RESULTS
In the whole sample the variance of being mono- vs poly-therapy users was explained by BZD/Z-drug formulation, DDD, duration of treatment, age of first BZDs/Z-drugs use (ΔR2 = 0.141, p < 0.001). Among those with current SUDs (ΔR2 = 0.278, p = 0.332) or current and lifetime SUDs (ΔR2 = 0.154, p = 0.419), no variables explained the variance of being mono-vs poly-therapy users. Among lifetime SUDs subjects, the variance of being mono- vs poly-therapy users was explained by BZD/Z-drug formulation and age of first BZD/Z-drug use (ΔR2 = 0.275, p < 0.001). Among non-SUDs subjects, the variance of being mono- vs poly-therapy users was explained by DDD and duration of treatment (ΔR2 = 0.162, p = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Tablets, high drug doses, long duration of treatment, and early age of first use were more likely associated to poly- than mono-therapy. This suggests that patients have different clinical features and a pharmacological prescription should be tailored to them also based on the variables here analysed.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34120917
pii: JRS210014
doi: 10.3233/JRS-210014
doi:

Substances chimiques

Pharmaceutical Preparations 0
Benzodiazepines 12794-10-4

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

295-320

Auteurs

Giovanni Mansueto (G)

Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Clinical Pharmacopsychology Laboratory, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Department of Psychology, Sigmund Freud University, Milan, Italy.

Fabio Lugoboni (F)

Addiction Medicine Unit, Department of Medicine, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy.

Rebecca Casari (R)

Addiction Medicine Unit, Department of Medicine, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy.

Anna Bertoldi (A)

Addiction Medicine Unit, Department of Medicine, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy.

Fiammetta Cosci (F)

Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Clinical Pharmacopsychology Laboratory, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Department of Psychiatry & Psychology, School for Mental Health & Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH