Perception and Evaluation of 23 Positive Emotions in Hong Kong and the Netherlands.

culture emotions individual perception positive emotions positive psychology societal evaluations

Journal

Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 02 07 2020
accepted: 09 04 2021
entrez: 14 6 2021
pubmed: 15 6 2021
medline: 15 6 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Positive emotions are linked to numerous benefits, but not everyone appreciates the same kinds of positive emotional experiences. We examine how distinct positive emotions are perceived and whether individuals' perceptions are linked to how societies evaluate those emotions. Participants from Hong Kong and Netherlands rated 23 positive emotions based on their individual perceptions (positivity, arousal, and socially engaging) and societal evaluations (appropriate, valued, and approved of). We found that (1) there were cultural differences in judgments about all six aspects of positive emotions; (2) positivity, arousal, and social engagement predicted emotions being positively regarded at the societal level in both cultures; and (3) that positivity mattered more for the Dutch participants, although arousal and social engagement mattered more in Hong Kong for societal evaluations. These findings provide a granular map of the perception and evaluation of distinct positive emotions in two cultures and highlight the role of cultures in the understanding how positive emotions are perceived and evaluated.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34122207
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.579474
pmc: PMC8195569
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

579474

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Sun, Hou, Hui, Siu, Engels and Sauter.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Emotion. 2017 Mar;17(2):267-295
pubmed: 27642656
Emotion. 2005 Sep;5(3):258-66
pubmed: 16187862
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Nov;91(5):890-903
pubmed: 17059308
Cogn Behav Ther. 2012;41(2):152-62
pubmed: 22428662
Emotion. 2014 Aug;14(4):804-15
pubmed: 24708499
Biom J. 2008 Jun;50(3):346-63
pubmed: 18481363
Emotion. 2009 Aug;9(4):441-56
pubmed: 19653765
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2007 Sep;2(3):242-59
pubmed: 26151968
Psychol Rev. 2003 Jan;110(1):145-72
pubmed: 12529060
Emotion. 2014 Aug;14(4):639-45
pubmed: 24749643
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Feb;90(2):288-307
pubmed: 16536652
Emotion. 2020 Dec;20(8):1311-1331
pubmed: 31535882
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Nov;81(5):869-85
pubmed: 11708563
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013 Apr;39(4):540-53
pubmed: 23471319

Auteurs

Rui Sun (R)

Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Wai Kai Hou (WK)

Department of Psychology, The Education University of Hong Kong, Tai Po, Hong Kong.

Bryant P H Hui (BPH)

Department of Sociology, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong.

Nicolson Yat-Fan Siu (NY)

Department of Counselling and Psychology, Hong Kong Shue Yan University, North Point, Hong Kong.

Tiarah Engels (T)

Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Disa A Sauter (DA)

Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH