Therapeutic effects of the TST36 stapler on rectocele combined with internal rectal prolapse.
Constipation
Internal rectal prolapse
Longo obstructed defecation syndrome score
Outlet obstructive constipation
Rectocele
TST36 stapler
Journal
World journal of gastrointestinal surgery
ISSN: 1948-9366
Titre abrégé: World J Gastrointest Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101532473
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 May 2021
27 May 2021
Historique:
received:
24
12
2020
revised:
15
01
2021
accepted:
12
04
2021
entrez:
14
6
2021
pubmed:
15
6
2021
medline:
15
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The most common causes of outlet obstructive constipation (OOC) are rectocele and internal rectal prolapse. The surgical methods for OOC are diverse and difficult, and the postoperative complications and recurrence rate are high, which results in both physical and mental pain in patients. With the continuous deepening of the surgeon's concept of minimally invasive surgery and continuous in-depth research on the mechanism of OOC, the treatment concepts and surgical methods are continuously improved. To determine the efficacy of the TST36 stapler in the treatment of rectocele combined with internal rectal prolapse. From January 2017 to July 2019, 49 female patients with rectocele and internal rectal prolapse who met the inclusion criteria were selected for treatment using the TST36 stapler. Forty-five patients were cured, 4 patients improved, and the cure rate was 92%. The postoperative obstructed defecation syndrome score, the defecation frequency score, time/straining intensity, and sensation of incomplete evacuation were significantly decreased compared with these parameters before treatment, and the differences were statistically significant ( The TST36 stapler is safe and effective in treating rectocele combined with internal rectal prolapse and is worth promoting in clinical work.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The most common causes of outlet obstructive constipation (OOC) are rectocele and internal rectal prolapse. The surgical methods for OOC are diverse and difficult, and the postoperative complications and recurrence rate are high, which results in both physical and mental pain in patients. With the continuous deepening of the surgeon's concept of minimally invasive surgery and continuous in-depth research on the mechanism of OOC, the treatment concepts and surgical methods are continuously improved.
AIM
OBJECTIVE
To determine the efficacy of the TST36 stapler in the treatment of rectocele combined with internal rectal prolapse.
METHODS
METHODS
From January 2017 to July 2019, 49 female patients with rectocele and internal rectal prolapse who met the inclusion criteria were selected for treatment using the TST36 stapler.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Forty-five patients were cured, 4 patients improved, and the cure rate was 92%. The postoperative obstructed defecation syndrome score, the defecation frequency score, time/straining intensity, and sensation of incomplete evacuation were significantly decreased compared with these parameters before treatment, and the differences were statistically significant (
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The TST36 stapler is safe and effective in treating rectocele combined with internal rectal prolapse and is worth promoting in clinical work.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34122734
doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i5.443
pmc: PMC8167842
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
443-451Informations de copyright
©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict-of-interest statement: There is no conflict of interest issue.
Références
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Jul;13(7):1310-1317.e1
pubmed: 25638584
Gastroenterology. 2006 Mar;130(3):657-64
pubmed: 16530506
Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2007 Feb;31(2):125-35
pubmed: 17347618
Int J Surg. 2020 Feb;74:53-60
pubmed: 31887419
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015 Dec;30(12):1723-8
pubmed: 26208412
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Nov;130(5):1017-1024
pubmed: 29016504
Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Sep;47(9):1533-8
pubmed: 15486753
Am J Surg. 2018 Nov;216(5):893-899
pubmed: 29499859
Gastroenterology. 2006 Apr;130(5):1480-91
pubmed: 16678561
Colorectal Dis. 2009 May;11(4):410-9
pubmed: 18637923
Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Apr;99(4):750-9
pubmed: 15089911
J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 Feb;21(2):380-388
pubmed: 27778256
ANZ J Surg. 2019 Jun;89(6):E231-E235
pubmed: 31083789
G Chir. 2013 Nov-Dec;34(11-12):332-6
pubmed: 24342163
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2017 Feb;30(1):63-75
pubmed: 28144214
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001 Mar;176(3):641-5
pubmed: 11222196
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jul;40(1):14-27
pubmed: 22045564
Turk J Surg. 2019 Jun 13;35(2):91-97
pubmed: 32550312
Indian J Urol. 2010 Apr;26(2):221-9
pubmed: 20877601
Colorectal Dis. 2013 Jun;15(6):695-9
pubmed: 23406289
World J Surg. 2007 Jun;31(6):1329-35
pubmed: 17457642
World J Surg. 2008 Jun;32(6):1110-5
pubmed: 18350243
Surg Innov. 2008 Jun;15(2):105-9
pubmed: 18403378
Colorectal Dis. 2010 Aug;12(8):822-30
pubmed: 19508530
Pharmacoeconomics. 2006;24(1):21-37
pubmed: 16445300
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Jul 15;26(2):227-36
pubmed: 17593068
Minerva Chir. 2015 Aug;70(4):273-82
pubmed: 25897588
Gastroenterology. 2006 Apr;130(5):1377-90
pubmed: 16678553
Minerva Ginecol. 2008 Apr;60(2):165-82
pubmed: 18487967
Colorectal Dis. 2013 Mar;15(3):368-73
pubmed: 22823279
Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Mar;51(3):348-54
pubmed: 18204882