Speed but Not Smoothness of Gait Reacts to Rehabilitation in Multiple Sclerosis.
Journal
Multiple sclerosis international
ISSN: 2090-2654
Titre abrégé: Mult Scler Int
Pays: Egypt
ID NLM: 101566861
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
24
02
2021
revised:
22
04
2021
accepted:
06
05
2021
entrez:
14
6
2021
pubmed:
15
6
2021
medline:
15
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Improved gait is one of the leading therapy goals in multiple sclerosis. A plethora of clinical timed trials and state-of-the-art technology-based approaches are available to assess gait performance. To examine what aspects of gait react to inpatient rehabilitation in MS and which parameters should be best assessed. In this longitudinal study, we examined the performance of 76 patients with MS to shed further light on factors influencing gait, associations between tests, and the reaction to inpatient rehabilitation during an average time span of 16 d. All gait parameters were strongly intercorrelated (all Since we were not able to observe improvements in smoothness of gait, we conclude that rehabilitation programs should be adapted to the patient's physiological capacities in order to allow for such improvements in smoothness of gait. Externally valid gait capacity (6MWT) could be predicted by a single walk for 10 s at natural pace.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34123427
doi: 10.1155/2021/5589562
pmc: PMC8192191
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
5589562Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Philipp Gulde et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
JH reports no competing interests. PG and PR both work for the inpatient rehabilitation provider. Both declare that the manuscript is free from competing interest bias. PG and PR both work for the Center for Clinical Neuroplasticity Medical Park Loipl GmbH & Co. KG and JH for the Technical University of Munich.
Références
Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1149-60
pubmed: 19897823
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2021 Feb;48:102674
pubmed: 33340928
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;958:141-159
pubmed: 28093712
Front Neurol. 2018 Feb 02;8:708
pubmed: 29449825
Hum Mov Sci. 2018 Aug;60:78-86
pubmed: 29843055
Mult Scler Int. 2017;2017:4815958
pubmed: 29181199
Gait Posture. 2017 Sep;57:204-210
pubmed: 28666178
Arch Neurol. 2000 Sep;57(9):1319-24
pubmed: 10987899
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2012 Aug;59(8):2126-36
pubmed: 22180502
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Jul;93(7):1167-72
pubmed: 22421626
Neurology. 2018 Nov 13;91(20):e1880-e1892
pubmed: 30333161
PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e28021
pubmed: 22132196
Front Neurol. 2018 Sep 12;9:615
pubmed: 30258393
Phys Ther. 2001 Feb;81(2):810-8
pubmed: 11175678
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014 May 27;11:89
pubmed: 24886525
Sports Med. 2004;34(15):1077-100
pubmed: 15575796
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019 Sep 5;16(1):110
pubmed: 31488184
J Sport Rehabil. 2020 Feb 1;29(2):192-199
pubmed: 30676232
Curr Sports Med Rep. 2019 Dec;18(12):452-457
pubmed: 31834177
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 30;10(10):e0141694
pubmed: 26517720
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019 May;30:98-103
pubmed: 30763908
Neurology. 1983 Nov;33(11):1444-52
pubmed: 6685237
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 5;9(1):3496
pubmed: 30837520
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Sep;94(9):1800-1828.e3
pubmed: 23669008
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019 Dec 23;39:101903
pubmed: 31927199
BMC Neurol. 2014 Mar 25;14:58
pubmed: 24666846
Mult Scler. 2008 Aug;14(7):988-91
pubmed: 18505775
Int J Rehabil Res. 2018 Dec;41(4):364-367
pubmed: 30044244
Mult Scler. 2008 Jan;14(1):35-53
pubmed: 17881393
Mult Scler. 2012 Jul;18(7):914-24
pubmed: 22740603
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Jul;96(7):1339-1348.e7
pubmed: 25712347
Neurol Sci. 2001 Apr;22(2):117-39
pubmed: 11603614
NeuroRehabilitation. 2017;40(4):579-585
pubmed: 28211827
Ann Neurol. 2002 Apr;51(4):475-80
pubmed: 11921053