Mapping of the Language Cortex.

broca’s cortical mapping eloquent area ionm language mapping neuromonitoring neurophysiology tumors wernicke’s

Journal

Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 May 2021
Historique:
entrez: 14 6 2021
pubmed: 15 6 2021
medline: 15 6 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Awake craniotomy with intraoperative neurophysiological language mapping (INLM) is an established procedure for patients undergoing surgery to resection tumors in the language cortex area. INLM and continuous neurophysiological monitoring allow assessment of the language function, which is not possible under general anesthesia. INLM of the brain areas provides a helpful tool to the operating surgeon in reducing the risks associated with tumor resection in the motor and language cortex. We present a literature review and the technical method used for INLM by utilizing direct electrical cortical stimulation. We also report the usefulness of INLM for evaluation of the language function during resection of cortical tumors, epilepsy foci, and arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) located near language areas. First, the central sulcus is identified by sensory mapping, followed by the motor cortex's identification by direct electrical cortical stimulation (DECS). Neurological assessment of the patient is done by auditory and visual feedback. The patient is asked to repeat numbers, days, words, sentences, read words, and name pictures during cortical stimulation. DECS may cause a slurring or speech arrest. Electrocorticography (ECoG) is also performed during cortical stimulation to identify any after-discharges. Examination of the patient occurs immediately after surgery, and then 24 hours, one week, six months, and 12 months postoperatively. Bipolar DECS for motor mapping with ECoG can safely and reliably be utilized to identify essential language areas with minimizing permanent language deficits and maximizing the extent of tumor resection.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34123657
doi: 10.7759/cureus.14960
pmc: PMC8191642
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e14960

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021, Jahangiri et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

J Neurosurg. 2004 Sep;101(3):458-66
pubmed: 15352604
Cureus. 2020 Sep 25;12(9):e10645
pubmed: 33133815
Front Hum Neurosci. 2011 Feb 22;5:13
pubmed: 21373361
Cureus. 2020 Mar 19;12(3):e7332
pubmed: 32313773
Neurosurgery. 1998 Jun;42(6):1312-6; discussion 1316-7
pubmed: 9632190
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2015;55 Suppl 1:1-13
pubmed: 26236798
Neurodiagn J. 2016;56(3):219-220
pubmed: 28436763
J Clin Neurophysiol. 2011 Apr;28(2):210-6
pubmed: 21399523
Neurosurg Focus. 2015 Jan;38(1):E3
pubmed: 25552283
J Neurosurg. 2014 May;120(5):1015-24
pubmed: 24628613
J Hist Neurosci. 2015;24(2):173-92
pubmed: 25210887

Auteurs

Faisal R Jahangiri (FR)

Neurophysiology, Axis Neuromonitoring LLC, Richardson, USA.
Neurophysiology, Global Innervation LLC, Dallas, USA.
Neuroscience, School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, USA.

Gurtegh S Chima (GS)

Neuroscience, School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, USA.

Martha Pearson (M)

Neuroscience, School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, USA.

Jacob Jackson (J)

Neuroscience, School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, USA.

Arshad A Siddiqui (AA)

Neurosurgery, Neuroscience Institute, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, QAT.

Classifications MeSH