Selection of Artificial Dermis for Shortening Treatment Period: Integra versus Pelnac.
Journal
Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open
ISSN: 2169-7574
Titre abrégé: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101622231
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2021
Jun 2021
Historique:
received:
06
01
2021
accepted:
31
03
2021
entrez:
14
6
2021
pubmed:
15
6
2021
medline:
15
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Skin reconstruction of full-thickness skin defect wounds using artificial dermis is performed using secondary split-thickness skin grafting. For the selection of artificial dermis to shorten the treatment period, the waiting time until secondary skin grafting was investigated when the dermis-like tissue was constructed with Pelnac or Integra. We evaluated 26 patients who underwent secondary skin grafting after dermis reconstruction with Pelnac (18 patients) or Integra (8 patients) for full-thickness skin defects between 2006 and 2017. The waiting period from artificial dermis application to closure of the full-thickness skin defect with a secondary skin graft was investigated retrospectively. Skin grafts survived well in all cases, and no complications of grafts or donors were observed. The mean waiting period was 17.5 ± 4.2 and 22.0 ± 4.6 days for the Pelnac and Integra groups, respectively (significantly shorter in the Pelnac group). The difference in waiting period is presumed to be due to the structural differences between the collagen sponge layer, which is the dermal replacement layer of Pelnac and Integra grafts. In cases where shortening the treatment period is important, Pelnac should be the first choice. In addition, in pediatric cases and widespread burns where it is difficult to control the infection during the waiting period, Pelnac is considered to be the first choice because the risk can be reduced by shortening the waiting period.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34123683
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003599
pmc: PMC8191699
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e3599Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.
Références
Int Wound J. 2016 Feb;13(1):137-40
pubmed: 25650053
Ann Surg. 1981 Oct;194(4):413-28
pubmed: 6792993
J Trauma. 2008 Mar;64(3):809-15
pubmed: 18332828
Chin Med J (Engl). 2013;126(8):1498-503
pubmed: 23595384
Burns. 2012 Feb;38(1):143-5
pubmed: 22047827
J Biomed Mater Res. 1980 Jan;14(1):65-81
pubmed: 6987234
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013 Nov;133(11):1521-6
pubmed: 23963344
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019 Nov;72(11):1741-1751
pubmed: 31492583
Burns. 2017 Jun;43(4):846-851
pubmed: 27866883
J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2015 Feb;49(1):25-31
pubmed: 24909822
Br J Plast Surg. 1995 Jun;48(4):222-9
pubmed: 7640855
Tissue Eng Part A. 2013 Sep;19(17-18):1931-40
pubmed: 23541061
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998 May;101(6):1552-60
pubmed: 9583486
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2011 Jul;25(7):788-93
pubmed: 21039916
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 23;10(3):e0120322
pubmed: 25798623
J Int Med Res. 2020 Aug;48(8):300060520945508
pubmed: 32790486