TI VIBE inversion MRI - An alternative to CT for imaging of hip pain.

Hip Inversion Pain T1VIBE

Journal

Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma
ISSN: 0976-5662
Titre abrégé: J Clin Orthop Trauma
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101559469

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2021
Historique:
received: 22 04 2021
revised: 21 05 2021
accepted: 21 05 2021
entrez: 14 6 2021
pubmed: 15 6 2021
medline: 15 6 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

MR and CT are excellent complimentary diagnostic modalities for evaluation of hip pain which are often used together along with radiographs. However, CT involves radiation, which is a concern particularly in younger patients. T1VIBE is a 3D gradient echo MR sequence with high intrinsic contrast between the bone and soft tissues with multiplanar capabilities. We performed a study to assess if TIVIBE can be used to complement MR for evaluation of hip pain in young adults and to see if measurements and angles can be calculated using T1VIBE inversion images with similar accuracy to CT scan. A retrospective review of 50 patients aged less than 40 years, who had MR (including TIVIBE) and CT of pelvis was performed. Post surgical patients were excluded. Some important measurements such as Centre edge angle, Tonnis' angle, anterior acetabular sector angle, posterior acetabular sector angle and acetabular version were independently measured by two readers on T1 VIBE inversion and CT images separately and measurements were compared. One reader performed the measurements again to assess for intra-observer error. There was a female predominance (37 F, 13M) with an average age of 27.6 years (range of 17-39). There was no significant difference in the measurements between CT and TI VIBE inversion and there was good intra and interobservor reliability. TI VIBE inversion sequence can be used as an alternative to CT with added advantage of alleviating the radiation exposure.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34123724
doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.05.030
pii: S0976-5662(21)00302-7
pmc: PMC8173306
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

196-199

Informations de copyright

© 2021 Delhi Orthopedic Association. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

No conflicts of interest.

Références

Br J Radiol. 2018 Jul;91(1088):20170815
pubmed: 29474097
Nihon Rinsho. 2004 Apr;62(4):790-8
pubmed: 15106351
Hip Pelvis. 2019 Sep;31(3):129-135
pubmed: 31501761
Skeletal Radiol. 2014 Aug;43(8):1041-51
pubmed: 24622927
Med Eng Phys. 2015 Aug;37(8):729-38
pubmed: 26037323
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005 Apr;21(4):376-82
pubmed: 15779026
Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2016 Dec 21;6(3):265-280
pubmed: 28066731
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 May;194(5):W414-9
pubmed: 20410387
Skeletal Radiol. 2017 Mar;46(3):325-331
pubmed: 28028575
Skeletal Radiol. 2016 Nov;45(11):1533-40
pubmed: 27614965
Invest Radiol. 2011 Oct;46(10):648-53
pubmed: 21577119

Auteurs

A Subramanian (A)

Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Royal Orthopedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK.

G Hegde (G)

Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Royal Orthopedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK.

C Azzopardi (C)

Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Royal Orthopedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK.

A M Davies (AM)

Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Royal Orthopedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK.

A Patel (A)

Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Royal Orthopedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK.

S L James (SL)

Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Royal Orthopedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK.

R Botchu (R)

Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Royal Orthopedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK.

Classifications MeSH