G2/M Checkpoint Abrogation With Selective Inhibitors Results in Increased Chromatid Breaks and Radiosensitization of 82-6 hTERT and RPE Human Cells.
DDR inhibitors
G2-M checkpoint
G2-assay
chromatid breaks
chromosomal radiosensitivity
Journal
Frontiers in public health
ISSN: 2296-2565
Titre abrégé: Front Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101616579
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
02
03
2021
accepted:
26
04
2021
entrez:
14
6
2021
pubmed:
15
6
2021
medline:
17
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
While technological advances in radiation oncology have led to a more precise delivery of radiation dose and a decreased risk of side effects, there is still a need to better understand the mechanisms underlying DNA damage response (DDR) at the DNA and cytogenetic levels, and to overcome tumor resistance. To maintain genomic stability, cells have developed sophisticated signaling pathways enabling cell cycle arrest to facilitate DNA repair via the DDR-related kinases and their downstream targets, so that DNA damage or DNA replication stress induced by genotoxic therapies can be resolved. ATM, ATR, and Chk1 kinases are key mediators in DDR activation and crucial factors in treatment resistance. It is of importance, therefore, as an alternative to the conventional clonogenic assay, to establish a cytogenetic assay enabling reliable and time-efficient results in evaluating the potency of DDR inhibitors for radiosensitization. Toward this goal, the present study aims at the development and optimization of a chromosomal radiosensitivity assay using the DDR and G2-checkpoint inhibitors as a novel modification compared to the classical G2-assay. Also, it aims at investigating the strengths of this assay for rapid radiosensitivity assessments in cultured cells, and potentially, in tumor cells obtained from biopsies. Specifically, exponentially growing RPE and 82-6 hTERT human cells are irradiated during the G2/M-phase transition in the presence or absence of Caffeine, VE-821, and UCN-1 inhibitors of ATM/ATR, ATR, and Chk1, respectively, and the induced chromatid breaks are used to evaluate cell radiosensitivity and their potency for radiosensitization. The increased yield of chromatid breaks in the presence of DDR inhibitors, which underpins radiosensitization, is similar to that observed in cells from highly radiosensitive AT-patients, and is considered here as 100% radiosensitive internal control. The results highlight the potential of our modified G2-assay using VE-821 to evaluate cell radiosensitivity, the efficacy of DDR inhibitors in radiosensitization, and reinforce the concept that ATM, ATR, and Chk1 represent attractive anticancer drug targets in radiation oncology.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34123995
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.675095
pmc: PMC8193504
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
675095Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Nikolakopoulou, Soni, Habibi, Karaiskos, Pantelias, Terzoudi and Iliakis.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Cancer Res. 1998 Oct 1;58(19):4375-82
pubmed: 9766667
Mol Cancer Ther. 2009 Oct;8(10):2894-902
pubmed: 19808981
DNA Repair (Amst). 2020 May;89:102828
pubmed: 32143127
Nucleic Acids Res. 2020 Feb 28;48(4):1905-1924
pubmed: 31832684
Radiother Oncol. 2011 Oct;101(1):28-34
pubmed: 22014898
Int J Oncol. 2009 Nov;35(5):1223-30
pubmed: 19787278
Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2016;16(3):200-8
pubmed: 26882028
Int J Radiat Biol. 1999 Jan;75(1):1-10
pubmed: 9972785
Cancer Res. 2014 Dec 1;74(23):6968-79
pubmed: 25269479
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1990 Jun 20;82(12):1050-4
pubmed: 2348470
Mini Rev Med Chem. 2014;14(10):805-11
pubmed: 25138084
Int J Radiat Biol. 2002 Sep;78(9):863-6
pubmed: 12428927
Radiat Res. 1996 Jan;145(1):3-16
pubmed: 8532833
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Oct 23;11(11):
pubmed: 31652722
Trends Cancer. 2017 Mar;3(3):225-234
pubmed: 28718433
Ecancermedicalscience. 2017 Nov 30;11:785
pubmed: 29225692
Cancer Biol Ther. 2012 Sep;13(11):1072-81
pubmed: 22825331
Cell Death Dis. 2012 Dec 06;3:e441
pubmed: 23222511
J Cell Sci. 2015 Dec 1;128(23):4255-62
pubmed: 26567218
Mol Cell Biol. 1996 Apr;16(4):1722-33
pubmed: 8657148
DNA Repair (Amst). 2021 May;101:103076
pubmed: 33640756
Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 10;9(1):14597
pubmed: 31601897
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2001 Oct;11(4):316-27
pubmed: 11677656
Mutat Res. 2010 Aug 14;701(1):27-37
pubmed: 20398788
Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Sep;41(16):7589-605
pubmed: 23804754
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Oct 28;11(11):
pubmed: 31661831
Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2020 May 1;5(1):60
pubmed: 32355263
Cancer Res. 2005 Dec 15;65(24):11292-6
pubmed: 16357135
Mol Cancer Ther. 2018 Oct;17(10):2206-2216
pubmed: 29970481
Front Oncol. 2018 Jul 13;8:245
pubmed: 30057890
Cell Cycle. 2018;17(5):595-604
pubmed: 29157079
J Biol Chem. 2003 Sep 26;278(39):37139-45
pubmed: 12847089
Mutat Res. 2011 Jun 3;711(1-2):174-86
pubmed: 21185845
Sci Rep. 2019 Jun 4;9(1):8255
pubmed: 31164689
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2013 Sep 01;5(9):
pubmed: 24003211
Nat Chem Biol. 2011 Apr 13;7(7):428-30
pubmed: 21490603