Metabolite Profiling of Pig Seminal Plasma Identifies Potential Biomarkers for Sperm Resilience to Liquid Preservation.

biomarkers liquid storage metabolite metabolomic pig seminal plasma sperm quality

Journal

Frontiers in cell and developmental biology
ISSN: 2296-634X
Titre abrégé: Front Cell Dev Biol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101630250

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 19 02 2021
accepted: 28 04 2021
entrez: 14 6 2021
pubmed: 15 6 2021
medline: 15 6 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Metabolomic approaches allow the study of downstream gene expression events since metabolites are considered as the products of cell signaling pathways. For this reason, many studies in humans have already been conducted to determine the influence of the metabolites present in seminal plasma (SP) on sperm physiology, and to identify putative biomarkers. However, in livestock species, these relationships are yet to be uncovered. Thus, the present study aimed to explore: (i) if concentrations of metabolites in pig SP are related to sperm quality and functionality, and (ii) if they could predict the sperm resilience to liquid storage at 17°C. To this end, 28 ejaculates were individually collected and split into three aliquots: one was used for SP analysis through nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy; another served for the evaluation of sperm concentration and morphology; and the last one was utilized to determine sperm functionality parameters using computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) and flow cytometry after 0 h and 72 h of liquid-storage at 17°C. NMR analysis allowed the identification and quantification of 23 metabolites present in pig SP which, except for fumarate, were not observed to follow a breed-dependent behavior. Moreover, specific relationships between metabolites and sperm variables were identified: (i) glutamate, methanol, trimethylamine N-oxide, carnitine, and isoleucine were seen to be related to some sperm quality and functionality parameters evaluated immediately after semen collection; (ii) leucine, hypotaurine, carnitine and isoleucine were found to be associated to the sperm ability to withstand liquid storage; and (iii) Bayesian multiple regression models allowed the identification of metabolite patterns for specific sperm parameters at both 0 h and 72 h. The identification of these relationships opens up the possibility of further investigating these metabolites as potential sperm functional biomarkers.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34124051
doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.669974
pmc: PMC8194698
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

669974

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Mateo-Otero, Fernández-López, Ribas-Maynou, Roca, Miró, Yeste and Barranco.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Theriogenology. 2019 Oct 1;137:2-7
pubmed: 31186127
Oncotarget. 2017 Dec 4;8(67):111807-111818
pubmed: 29340093
Theriogenology. 2019 Dec;140:18-24
pubmed: 31421531
Am J Clin Nutr. 1998 Mar;67(3 Suppl):519S-526S
pubmed: 9497163
NMR Biomed. 1997 Oct;10(7):341-7
pubmed: 9471125
Cell Tissue Res. 2021 Feb;383(2):881-903
pubmed: 33151454
Reprod Domest Anim. 2015 Jul;50 Suppl 2:48-55
pubmed: 26174919
Trends Biotechnol. 2004 May;22(5):245-52
pubmed: 15109811
Open Biol. 2020 Nov;10(11):200092
pubmed: 33142083
Anim Reprod Sci. 2009 Jan;110(1-2):162-71
pubmed: 18295985
Anim Reprod Sci. 2012 May;132(1-2):66-73
pubmed: 22554791
Theriogenology. 2017 Jun;95:149-153
pubmed: 28460669
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 20;14(2):e0211679
pubmed: 30785892
Biomolecules. 2020 Jun 15;10(6):
pubmed: 32549232
Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2013 Feb;59(1):5-12
pubmed: 23083319
Theriogenology. 2016 Jul 1;86(1):187-93
pubmed: 26723133
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2014 Sep;31(9):1195-204
pubmed: 24965760
Cell. 2018 Oct 4;175(2):502-513.e13
pubmed: 30245009
Antioxidants (Basel). 2020 Aug 12;9(8):
pubmed: 32806672
Environ Int. 2019 Aug;129:354-363
pubmed: 31150977
Theriogenology. 2019 Oct 1;137:23-29
pubmed: 31208776
Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2018 Oct;64(5):324-339
pubmed: 29965778
J Androl. 1990 Jan-Feb;11(1):66-72
pubmed: 2312401
Hum Reprod Update. 2017 Nov 1;23(6):723-736
pubmed: 29069503
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 10;13(4):e0195279
pubmed: 29634739
Am J Reprod Immunol. 2011 Jul;66 Suppl 1:11-22
pubmed: 21726334
Semin Reprod Med. 2014 Mar;32(2):141-52
pubmed: 24515909
Fertil Steril. 2004 Jun;81(6):1578-84
pubmed: 15193480
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019 Feb;36(2):241-253
pubmed: 30382470
Biology (Basel). 2020 Apr 10;9(4):
pubmed: 32290279
Andrologia. 2019 Jul;51(6):e13267
pubmed: 30873633
Hum Reprod. 2013 Aug;28(8):2045-57
pubmed: 23760160
Sci Rep. 2015 Dec 21;5:18538
pubmed: 26688188
J Reprod Fertil. 1993 Jan;97(1):51-5
pubmed: 8464025
Mol Reprod Dev. 2015 Feb;82(2):123-31
pubmed: 25640164
Reprod Domest Anim. 2011 Sep;46 Suppl 2:45-8
pubmed: 21884276
J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2020 Jan 5;177:112888
pubmed: 31563758
J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2011 Jan 5;54(1):106-13
pubmed: 20719458
J Ethnopharmacol. 2013 Aug 26;149(1):208-14
pubmed: 23796876
Asian J Androl. 2010 Jan;12(1):99-103
pubmed: 20111089
Andrology. 2015 Mar;3(2):315-20
pubmed: 25598515
Andrology. 2020 Mar;8(2):450-456
pubmed: 31520509
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:105280
pubmed: 24729963
Chem Biol Interact. 2006 May 15;161(1):14-25
pubmed: 16564515
Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2015;61(6):353-9
pubmed: 26236922
Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2007 Jul;7(4):351-8
pubmed: 17620044
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 14;11(9):e0162958
pubmed: 27627110
Reproduction. 2017 Sep;154(3):237-243
pubmed: 28611113
J Hum Reprod Sci. 2014 Apr;7(2):73-92
pubmed: 25191020
Metabolites. 2019 Jun 27;9(7):
pubmed: 31252628
J Reprod Fertil. 1995 Jan;103(1):181-7
pubmed: 7707296
Theriogenology. 2019 Oct 1;137:36-42
pubmed: 31200934
Fertil Steril. 2013 Mar 15;99(4):998-1007
pubmed: 23415969
Anesth Analg. 2018 May;126(5):1763-1768
pubmed: 29481436
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2020 Nov;33(11):1763-1769
pubmed: 32054191
Theriogenology. 2007 Sep 1;68 Suppl 1:S56-62
pubmed: 17490741
Andrologia. 2016 Aug;48(6):609-16
pubmed: 26608970
J Androl. 1992 May-Jun;13(3):289-92
pubmed: 1601750
Fertil Steril. 2005 Feb;83(2):355-61
pubmed: 15705374

Auteurs

Yentel Mateo-Otero (Y)

Biotechnology of Animal and Human Reproduction (TechnoSperm), Institute of Food and Agricultural Technology, University of Girona, Girona, Spain.
Unit of Cell Biology, Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Girona, Girona, Spain.

Pol Fernández-López (P)

Centre d'Estudis Avançats de Blanes (CEAB), Spanish Research Council (CSIC), Girona, Spain.

Jordi Ribas-Maynou (J)

Biotechnology of Animal and Human Reproduction (TechnoSperm), Institute of Food and Agricultural Technology, University of Girona, Girona, Spain.
Unit of Cell Biology, Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Girona, Girona, Spain.

Jordi Roca (J)

Department of Animal Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.

Jordi Miró (J)

Equine Reproduction Service, Department of Animal Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Marc Yeste (M)

Biotechnology of Animal and Human Reproduction (TechnoSperm), Institute of Food and Agricultural Technology, University of Girona, Girona, Spain.
Unit of Cell Biology, Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Girona, Girona, Spain.

Isabel Barranco (I)

Biotechnology of Animal and Human Reproduction (TechnoSperm), Institute of Food and Agricultural Technology, University of Girona, Girona, Spain.
Unit of Cell Biology, Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Girona, Girona, Spain.
Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences, Via Tolara di Sopra, Bologna, Italy.

Classifications MeSH