Incorporating oral PrEP into standard prevention services for South African women: a nested interrupted time-series study.
Journal
The lancet. HIV
ISSN: 2352-3018
Titre abrégé: Lancet HIV
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101645355
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2021
08 2021
Historique:
received:
27
10
2020
revised:
23
02
2021
accepted:
25
02
2021
pubmed:
15
6
2021
medline:
20
8
2021
entrez:
14
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
As oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) becomes the standard of prevention globally, its potential effect on HIV incidence in clinical trials of new prevention interventions is unknown, particularly for trials among women. In a trial measuring HIV incidence in African women, oral PrEP was incorporated into the standard of prevention in the trial's last year. We assessed the effect of on-site access to PrEP on HIV incidence in this natural experiment. We did a nested interrupted time-series study using data from the ECHO trial. At 12 sites in four countries (Eswatini, Kenya, South Africa, and Zambia), women (aged 16-35 years) were randomly assigned to receive one of three contraceptives between Dec 14, 2015, and Sept 12, 2017, and followed up quarterly for up to 18 months to determine the effect of contraceptive method on HIV acquisition. Women were eligible if they wanted long-acting contraception, were medically qualified to receive study contraceptives, and had not used any of the study contraceptives in the past 6 months. The present analyses are limited to nine South African sites where on-site access to oral PrEP was implemented between March 13 and June 12, 2018. Using an interrupted time-series design, we compared HIV incidence before versus after PrEP access, limited to quarterly study visits at which on-site PrEP access was available to at least some participants and, in a sensitivity analysis, to the 180 days before and after access. The outcome was incident HIV infection, detected using two rapid HIV tests done in parallel for each participant at every scheduled follow-up visit. This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02550067. 2124 women were followed up after on-site PrEP access began, of whom 543 (26%) reported PrEP use. A total of 12 HIV seroconversions were observed in 556 person-years (incidence 2·16%) after on-site PrEP access, compared with 133 HIV seroconversions in 2860 person-years (4·65%) before PrEP access (adjusted incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0·45, 95% CI 0·25-0·82, p=0·0085). Similar results were also observed when limiting the analysis to 180 days before versus after PrEP access. A total of 46 HIV seroconversions were observed in 919 person-years within 180 days before PrEP access, compared with 11 seroconversions in 481 person-years in the 180 days following PrEP access (incidence 5·00 vs 2·29 per 100 person-years; IRR 0·43, 95% CI 0·22-0·88, p=0·012). On-site access to PrEP as part of standard of prevention in a clinical trial among women in South Africa was associated with halving HIV incidence, when approximately a quarter of women started PrEP. Providing access to on-site PrEP could decrease incidence in HIV prevention trials. These data are also among the first to show in any setting that access to PrEP is associated with decreased HIV acquisition among South African women. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, United States Agency for International Development, President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency, South African Medical Research Council, and United Nations Population Fund.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
As oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) becomes the standard of prevention globally, its potential effect on HIV incidence in clinical trials of new prevention interventions is unknown, particularly for trials among women. In a trial measuring HIV incidence in African women, oral PrEP was incorporated into the standard of prevention in the trial's last year. We assessed the effect of on-site access to PrEP on HIV incidence in this natural experiment.
METHODS
We did a nested interrupted time-series study using data from the ECHO trial. At 12 sites in four countries (Eswatini, Kenya, South Africa, and Zambia), women (aged 16-35 years) were randomly assigned to receive one of three contraceptives between Dec 14, 2015, and Sept 12, 2017, and followed up quarterly for up to 18 months to determine the effect of contraceptive method on HIV acquisition. Women were eligible if they wanted long-acting contraception, were medically qualified to receive study contraceptives, and had not used any of the study contraceptives in the past 6 months. The present analyses are limited to nine South African sites where on-site access to oral PrEP was implemented between March 13 and June 12, 2018. Using an interrupted time-series design, we compared HIV incidence before versus after PrEP access, limited to quarterly study visits at which on-site PrEP access was available to at least some participants and, in a sensitivity analysis, to the 180 days before and after access. The outcome was incident HIV infection, detected using two rapid HIV tests done in parallel for each participant at every scheduled follow-up visit. This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02550067.
FINDINGS
2124 women were followed up after on-site PrEP access began, of whom 543 (26%) reported PrEP use. A total of 12 HIV seroconversions were observed in 556 person-years (incidence 2·16%) after on-site PrEP access, compared with 133 HIV seroconversions in 2860 person-years (4·65%) before PrEP access (adjusted incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0·45, 95% CI 0·25-0·82, p=0·0085). Similar results were also observed when limiting the analysis to 180 days before versus after PrEP access. A total of 46 HIV seroconversions were observed in 919 person-years within 180 days before PrEP access, compared with 11 seroconversions in 481 person-years in the 180 days following PrEP access (incidence 5·00 vs 2·29 per 100 person-years; IRR 0·43, 95% CI 0·22-0·88, p=0·012).
INTERPRETATION
On-site access to PrEP as part of standard of prevention in a clinical trial among women in South Africa was associated with halving HIV incidence, when approximately a quarter of women started PrEP. Providing access to on-site PrEP could decrease incidence in HIV prevention trials. These data are also among the first to show in any setting that access to PrEP is associated with decreased HIV acquisition among South African women.
FUNDING
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, United States Agency for International Development, President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency, South African Medical Research Council, and United Nations Population Fund.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34126052
pii: S2352-3018(21)00048-5
doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(21)00048-5
pmc: PMC8340029
pii:
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02550067']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e495-e501Subventions
Organisme : PEPFAR
Pays : United States
Investigateurs
Peter B Gichangi
(PB)
Kate B Heller
(KB)
Nomthandazo Mbandazayo
(N)
Charles S Morrison
(CS)
Kavita Nanda
(K)
Caitlin W Scoville
(CW)
Kathleen Shears
(K)
Petrus S Steyn
(PS)
Douglas Taylor
(D)
Katherine K Thomas
(KK)
James Kiarie
(J)
Jessica Justman
(J)
Zelda Nhlabatsi
(Z)
Linda-Gail Bekker
(LG)
Gonasagrie Nair
(G)
G Justus Hofmeyr
(GJ)
Mandisa Singata-Madliki
(M)
Raesibe Agnes Pearl Selepe
(RAP)
Sydney Sibiya
(S)
Margaret Phiri Kasaro
(M)
Jeffrey Stringer
(J)
Nelly R Mugo
(NR)
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of interests JMB reports grants from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and United States Agency for International Development, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Gilead Sciences, Janssen, and Merck, outside the submitted work; and since the completion of the work, he is an employee of Gilead Sciences. RH reports grants from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and United States Agency for International Development, during the conduct of the study. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Références
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020 Dec;4(12):875-883
pubmed: 33222803
Lancet HIV. 2020 Jan;7(1):e38-e48
pubmed: 31813837
Lancet HIV. 2019 Aug;6(8):e489-e491
pubmed: 31221591
PLoS Med. 2021 Feb 9;18(2):e1003492
pubmed: 33561143
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2018 Jan 1;77(1):e8-e10
pubmed: 28961677
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2018 Aug;34(8):645-656
pubmed: 29732896
N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec;375(22):2121-2132
pubmed: 26900902
Lancet HIV. 2019 Nov;6(11):e800-e806
pubmed: 31570273
Lancet. 2019 Jul 27;394(10195):303-313
pubmed: 31204114
J Int AIDS Soc. 2020 May;23(5):e25491
pubmed: 32396700
South Afr J HIV Med. 2016 Mar 15;17(1):455
pubmed: 29568613
AIDS Behav. 2020 Sep;24(9):2520-2531
pubmed: 32052214
N Engl J Med. 2015 Feb 5;372(6):509-18
pubmed: 25651245
Lancet HIV. 2018 Jun;5(6):e329-e334
pubmed: 29893246
N Engl J Med. 2012 Aug 2;367(5):411-22
pubmed: 22784040
Lancet HIV. 2019 Jul;6(7):e475-e482
pubmed: 31078451
Dev World Bioeth. 2013 Aug;13(2):87-94
pubmed: 23725227
N Engl J Med. 2021 Mar 25;384(12):1089-1100
pubmed: 33761206