Deep Learning-Based Automated Echocardiographic Quantification of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: A Point-of-Care Solution.


Journal

Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging
ISSN: 1942-0080
Titre abrégé: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101479935

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2021
Historique:
pubmed: 16 6 2021
medline: 22 9 2021
entrez: 15 6 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

We have recently tested an automated machine-learning algorithm that quantifies left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) from guidelines-recommended apical views. However, in the point-of-care (POC) setting, apical 2-chamber views are often difficult to obtain, limiting the usefulness of this approach. Since most POC physicians often rely on visual assessment of apical 4-chamber and parasternal long-axis views, our algorithm was adapted to use either one of these 3 views or any combination. This study aimed to (1) test the accuracy of these automated estimates; (2) determine whether they could be used to accurately classify LV function. Reference EF was obtained using conventional biplane measurements by experienced echocardiographers. In protocol 1, we used echocardiographic images from 166 clinical examinations. Both automated and reference EF values were used to categorize LV function as hyperdynamic (EF>73%), normal (53%-73%), mildly-to-moderately (30%-52%), or severely reduced (<30%). Additionally, LV function was visually estimated for each view by 10 experienced physicians. Accuracy of the detection of reduced LV function (EF<53%) by the automated classification and physicians' interpretation was assessed against the reference classification. In protocol 2, we tested the new machine-learning algorithm in the POC setting on images acquired by nurses using a portable imaging system. Protocol 1: the agreement with the reference EF values was good (intraclass correlation, 0.86-0.95), with biases <2%. Machine-learning classification of LV function showed similar accuracy to that by physicians in most views, with only 10% to 15% cases where it was less accurate. Protocol 2: the agreement with the reference values was excellent (intraclass correlation=0.84) with a minimal bias of 2.5±6.4%. The new machine-learning algorithm allows accurate automated evaluation of LV function from echocardiographic views commonly used in the POC setting. This approach will enable more POC personnel to accurately assess LV function.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
We have recently tested an automated machine-learning algorithm that quantifies left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) from guidelines-recommended apical views. However, in the point-of-care (POC) setting, apical 2-chamber views are often difficult to obtain, limiting the usefulness of this approach. Since most POC physicians often rely on visual assessment of apical 4-chamber and parasternal long-axis views, our algorithm was adapted to use either one of these 3 views or any combination. This study aimed to (1) test the accuracy of these automated estimates; (2) determine whether they could be used to accurately classify LV function.
METHODS
Reference EF was obtained using conventional biplane measurements by experienced echocardiographers. In protocol 1, we used echocardiographic images from 166 clinical examinations. Both automated and reference EF values were used to categorize LV function as hyperdynamic (EF>73%), normal (53%-73%), mildly-to-moderately (30%-52%), or severely reduced (<30%). Additionally, LV function was visually estimated for each view by 10 experienced physicians. Accuracy of the detection of reduced LV function (EF<53%) by the automated classification and physicians' interpretation was assessed against the reference classification. In protocol 2, we tested the new machine-learning algorithm in the POC setting on images acquired by nurses using a portable imaging system.
RESULTS
Protocol 1: the agreement with the reference EF values was good (intraclass correlation, 0.86-0.95), with biases <2%. Machine-learning classification of LV function showed similar accuracy to that by physicians in most views, with only 10% to 15% cases where it was less accurate. Protocol 2: the agreement with the reference values was excellent (intraclass correlation=0.84) with a minimal bias of 2.5±6.4%.
CONCLUSIONS
The new machine-learning algorithm allows accurate automated evaluation of LV function from echocardiographic views commonly used in the POC setting. This approach will enable more POC personnel to accurately assess LV function.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34126754
doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.120.012293
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e012293

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Auteurs

Federico M Asch (FM)

MedStar Health Research Institute, Washington, DC (F.M.A.).

Victor Mor-Avi (V)

University of Chicago, IL (V.M.-A., R.M.L.).

David Rubenson (D)

Scripps Clinic and Prebys Cardiovascular Institute, La Jolla, CA (D.R.).

Steven Goldstein (S)

MedStar Washington Hospital Center, DC (S.G., C.P.).

Muhamed Saric (M)

New York University Langone Health (M.S.).

Issam Mikati (I)

Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL (I.M., R.H., J.D.T.).

Samuel Surette (S)

Caption Health Inc, San Francisco, CA (S.S., A.C., N.P., H.H., R.P.M.).

Ali Chaudhry (A)

Caption Health Inc, San Francisco, CA (S.S., A.C., N.P., H.H., R.P.M.).

Nicolas Poilvert (N)

Caption Health Inc, San Francisco, CA (S.S., A.C., N.P., H.H., R.P.M.).

Ha Hong (H)

Caption Health Inc, San Francisco, CA (S.S., A.C., N.P., H.H., R.P.M.).

Russ Horowitz (R)

Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL (I.M., R.H., J.D.T.).

Daniel Park (D)

University of North Carolina Medical Center (D.P).

Jose L Diaz-Gomez (JL)

Baylor St. Luke's Medical Center, Houston, TX (J.L.D.-G.).

Brandon Boesch (B)

Highland Hospital, Oakland, CA (B.B.).

Sara Nikravan (S)

University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle (S.N.).

Rachel B Liu (RB)

Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (R.B.L.).

Carolyn Philips (C)

MedStar Washington Hospital Center, DC (S.G., C.P.).

James D Thomas (JD)

Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL (I.M., R.H., J.D.T.).

Randolph P Martin (RP)

Caption Health Inc, San Francisco, CA (S.S., A.C., N.P., H.H., R.P.M.).
Emory University Medical Center, Atlanta, GA (R.P.M.).

Roberto M Lang (RM)

University of Chicago, IL (V.M.-A., R.M.L.).

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH