Safety of COVID-19 vaccines, their components or their platforms for pregnant women: A rapid review.


Journal

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences
Titre abrégé: medRxiv
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101767986

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 Jun 2021
Historique:
entrez: 15 6 2021
pubmed: 16 6 2021
medline: 16 6 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Pregnant women with COVID-19 are at an increased risk of severe COVID-19 illness as well as adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes. Many countries are vaccinating or considering vaccinating pregnant women with limited available data about the safety of this strategy. Early identification of safety concerns of COVID-19 vaccines, including their components, or their technological platforms is therefore urgently needed. We conducted a rapid systematic review, as the first phase of an ongoing full systematic review, to evaluate the safety of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnant women, including their components, and their technological platforms (whole virus, protein, viral vector or nucleic acid) used in other vaccines, following the Cochrane methods and the PRISMA statement for reporting (PROSPERO-CRD42021234185).We searched literature databases, COVID-19 and pregnancy registries from inception February 2021 without time or language restriction and explored the reference lists of relevant systematic reviews retrieved. We selected studies of any methodological design that included at least 50 pregnant women or pregnant animals exposed to the vaccines that were selected for review by the COVAX MIWG in August 2020 or their components or platforms included in the COVID-19 vaccines, and evaluated adverse events during pregnancy and the neonatal period.Pairs of reviewers independently selected studies through the COVIDENCE web software and performed the data extraction through a previously piloted online extraction form. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus. We identified 6768 records, 256 potentially eligible studies were assessed by full-text, and 37 clinical and non-clinical studies (38 reports, involving 2,397,715 pregnant women and 56 pregnant animals) and 12 pregnancy registries were included.Most studies (89%) were conducted in high-income countries. The most frequent study design was cohort studies (n=21), followed by surveillance studies, randomized controlled trials, and registry analyses. Most studies (76%) allowed comparisons between vaccinated and unvaccinated pregnant women (n=25) or animals (n=3) and reported exposures during the three trimesters of pregnancy.The most frequent exposure was to AS03 adjuvant in the context of A/H1N1 pandemic influenza vaccines (n=24), followed by aluminum-based adjuvants (n=11). Aluminum phosphate was used in Respiratory Syncytial Virus Fusion candidate vaccines (n=3) and Tdap vaccines (n=3). Different aluminum-based adjuvants were used in hepatitis vaccines. The replication-deficient simian adenovirus ChAdOx1 was used for a Rift Valley fever vaccine. Only one study reported exposure to messenger RNA (mRNA) COVID-19 vaccines that also used lipid nanoparticles. Except for one preliminary report about A/H1N1 influenza vaccination (adjuvant AS03) - corrected by the authors in a more thorough analysis, all studies concluded that there were no safety concerns. This rapid review found no evidence of pregnancy-associated safety concerns of COVID-19 vaccines that were selected for review by the COVAX MIWG or of their components or platforms when used in other vaccines. However, the need for further data on several vaccine platforms and components is warranted given their novelty. Our findings support current WHO guidelines recommending that pregnant women may consider receiving COVID-19 vaccines, particularly if they are at high risk of exposure or have comorbidities that enhance the risk of severe disease.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Pregnant women with COVID-19 are at an increased risk of severe COVID-19 illness as well as adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes. Many countries are vaccinating or considering vaccinating pregnant women with limited available data about the safety of this strategy. Early identification of safety concerns of COVID-19 vaccines, including their components, or their technological platforms is therefore urgently needed.
METHODS METHODS
We conducted a rapid systematic review, as the first phase of an ongoing full systematic review, to evaluate the safety of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnant women, including their components, and their technological platforms (whole virus, protein, viral vector or nucleic acid) used in other vaccines, following the Cochrane methods and the PRISMA statement for reporting (PROSPERO-CRD42021234185).We searched literature databases, COVID-19 and pregnancy registries from inception February 2021 without time or language restriction and explored the reference lists of relevant systematic reviews retrieved. We selected studies of any methodological design that included at least 50 pregnant women or pregnant animals exposed to the vaccines that were selected for review by the COVAX MIWG in August 2020 or their components or platforms included in the COVID-19 vaccines, and evaluated adverse events during pregnancy and the neonatal period.Pairs of reviewers independently selected studies through the COVIDENCE web software and performed the data extraction through a previously piloted online extraction form. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus.
RESULTS RESULTS
We identified 6768 records, 256 potentially eligible studies were assessed by full-text, and 37 clinical and non-clinical studies (38 reports, involving 2,397,715 pregnant women and 56 pregnant animals) and 12 pregnancy registries were included.Most studies (89%) were conducted in high-income countries. The most frequent study design was cohort studies (n=21), followed by surveillance studies, randomized controlled trials, and registry analyses. Most studies (76%) allowed comparisons between vaccinated and unvaccinated pregnant women (n=25) or animals (n=3) and reported exposures during the three trimesters of pregnancy.The most frequent exposure was to AS03 adjuvant in the context of A/H1N1 pandemic influenza vaccines (n=24), followed by aluminum-based adjuvants (n=11). Aluminum phosphate was used in Respiratory Syncytial Virus Fusion candidate vaccines (n=3) and Tdap vaccines (n=3). Different aluminum-based adjuvants were used in hepatitis vaccines. The replication-deficient simian adenovirus ChAdOx1 was used for a Rift Valley fever vaccine. Only one study reported exposure to messenger RNA (mRNA) COVID-19 vaccines that also used lipid nanoparticles. Except for one preliminary report about A/H1N1 influenza vaccination (adjuvant AS03) - corrected by the authors in a more thorough analysis, all studies concluded that there were no safety concerns.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
This rapid review found no evidence of pregnancy-associated safety concerns of COVID-19 vaccines that were selected for review by the COVAX MIWG or of their components or platforms when used in other vaccines. However, the need for further data on several vaccine platforms and components is warranted given their novelty. Our findings support current WHO guidelines recommending that pregnant women may consider receiving COVID-19 vaccines, particularly if they are at high risk of exposure or have comorbidities that enhance the risk of severe disease.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34127978
doi: 10.1101/2021.06.03.21258283
pmc: PMC8202435
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Preprint

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
ID : INV-008443
Pays : United States

Commentaires et corrections

Type : UpdateIn

Références

Milbank Q. 2021 Jun;99(2):426-449
pubmed: 33650737
NPJ Vaccines. 2019 Oct 18;4:44
pubmed: 31646004
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Dec 20;165(12):848-855
pubmed: 27654505
PLoS Med. 2021 Mar 29;18(3):e1003583
pubmed: 33780438
Vaccine. 2011 Feb 4;29(7):1357-8
pubmed: 21185422
Vaccine. 2018 Jan 2;36(1):50-54
pubmed: 29174107
Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Mar 1;60(5):e11-9
pubmed: 25409473
Vaccine. 2009 Sep 4;27(40):5530-7
pubmed: 19607950
BMJ. 2012 May 02;344:e2794
pubmed: 22551713
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Nov 06;69(44):1641-1647
pubmed: 33151921
BMJ. 2019 Mar 20;364:l869
pubmed: 30894356
PLoS One. 2012 Dec 20;7(12):e51734
pubmed: 23341865
JAMA. 2012 Jul 11;308(2):165-74
pubmed: 22782418
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Nov;126(5):1075-1084
pubmed: 26444106
Drug Saf. 2013 Jun;36(6):455-65
pubmed: 23516007
Vaccine. 2018 Oct 1;36(41):6111-6116
pubmed: 30194002
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 01;2:CD001269
pubmed: 29388196
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018 May;141(2):141-150
pubmed: 29149524
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Jan 18;68(3):402-408
pubmed: 30475988
BMJ. 2015 Nov 16;351:h5585
pubmed: 26572546
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Sep;225(3):303.e1-303.e17
pubmed: 33775692
Vaccine. 2011 Nov 15;29(49):9159-70
pubmed: 21840359
J Perinat Med. 2020 Nov 26;48(9):900-911
pubmed: 33001856
Vaccine. 2011 Aug 26;29(37):6358-65
pubmed: 21596080
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 14;14(8):e0220910
pubmed: 31412058
CMAJ. 2014 Feb 4;186(2):137
pubmed: 24492526
J Travel Med. 2020 Mar 13;27(2):
pubmed: 31616947
Vaccine. 2012 Jun 22;30(30):4445-52
pubmed: 22564554
Rev Cubana Med Trop. 2011 Sep-Dec;63(3):231-8
pubmed: 23444612
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2019;15(3):687-699
pubmed: 30380986
J Pediatr. 1964 Mar;64:357-71
pubmed: 14130709
J Pediatr. 1987 Apr;110(4):531-7
pubmed: 3559800
Vaccine. 2015 Sep 11;33(38):4850-7
pubmed: 26238723
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jun 17;384(24):2273-2282
pubmed: 33882218
Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Aug 1;138(2):278-280
pubmed: 33910219
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jun;210(6):561.e1-6
pubmed: 24378675
Am J Perinatol. 2016 Sep;33(11):1104-14
pubmed: 27603545
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Feb;130:13-22
pubmed: 33068715
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2003 Jun;12(4):335-40
pubmed: 12812014
BJOG. 2012 Dec;119(13):1583-90
pubmed: 22901103
Vaccine. 2020 Sep 11;38(40):6215-6223
pubmed: 32741674
Am J Public Health. 2012 Jun;102(6):e33-40
pubmed: 22515877
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jul 30;383(5):426-439
pubmed: 32726529
BMJ. 2021 Jan 5;372:m4853
pubmed: 33402340
Lancet. 2021 Mar 13;397(10278):941
pubmed: 33714374
BMJ. 2020 Sep 1;370:m3320
pubmed: 32873575
Drug Saf. 2012 Jan 1;35(1):1-14
pubmed: 22149417
N Engl J Med. 1976 Jul 22;295(4):204-7
pubmed: 1272350
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2012 May;73(5):801-11
pubmed: 22082196
Birth Defects Res. 2019 Nov 1;111(18):1420-1435
pubmed: 31580536
N Engl J Med. 2013 Jan 24;368(4):333-40
pubmed: 23323868
Vaccine. 2011 Feb 1;29(6):1180-4
pubmed: 21172382
Eur J Epidemiol. 2013 Jul;28(7):579-88
pubmed: 23715672
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021 Jul;100(7):1200-1218
pubmed: 33560530
Vaccine. 2015 Nov 25;33(47):6488-92
pubmed: 26319066
Lancet. 2016 Oct 8;388(10053):1725-1774
pubmed: 27733285
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 29;16(6):e0253974
pubmed: 34185807
J Infect Dis. 2019 Oct 22;220(11):1802-1815
pubmed: 31402384
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Nov 16;73(10):1909-1912
pubmed: 33822014
BJOG. 2015 Jan;122(1):17-26
pubmed: 25040307
BMJ. 2017 May 30;357:j2249
pubmed: 28559234

Auteurs

Classifications MeSH