Retrospective study of treatment patterns and outcomes post-lenalidomide for multiple myeloma in Canada.


Journal

European journal of haematology
ISSN: 1600-0609
Titre abrégé: Eur J Haematol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8703985

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2021
Historique:
revised: 11 06 2021
received: 01 03 2021
accepted: 14 06 2021
pubmed: 16 6 2021
medline: 20 1 2022
entrez: 15 6 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Lenalidomide is an important component of initial therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, either as maintenance therapy post-autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or as first-line therapy with dexamethasone for patients' ineligible for ASCT (non-ASCT). This retrospective study investigated treatment patterns and outcomes for ASCT-eligible and -ineligible patients who relapsed after lenalidomide as part of first-line therapy, based on data from the Canadian Myeloma Research Group Database for patients treated between January 2007 and April 2019. Among 256 patients who progressed on lenalidomide maintenance therapy, 28.5% received further immunomodulatory derivative-based (IMiD-based) therapy (lenalidomide/pomalidomide) without a proteasome inhibitor (PI) (bortezomib/carfilzomib/ixazomib), 26.2% received PI-based therapy without an IMiD, 19.5% received both an IMiD plus PI, 13.5% received daratumumab-based regimens, and 12.1% underwent salvage ASCT. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was longest for daratumumab-based therapy (22.7 months) and salvage ASCT (23.4 months) and ranged from 6.6 to 7.3 months for the other treatments (P < .0001). Median overall survival (OS) was also longest for daratumumab and salvage ASCT. A total of 87 non-ASCT patients received subsequent therapy, with 66.7% receiving bortezomib-based therapy and 13.8% receiving other PI-based therapy. Median PFS was 15.4 and 24.8 months for bortezomib-based and other PI-based therapy, respectively (P = .404). During most of the study period, daratumumab was not funded; in this setting, switching to a different therapeutic class following relapse on lenalidomide produced the longest remissions for non-ASCT patients. Further prospective studies are warranted to determine optimum treatment following relapse on lenalidomide, especially in the light of increased access to daratumumab.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34129703
doi: 10.1111/ejh.13678
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antibodies, Monoclonal 0
Boron Compounds 0
Oligopeptides 0
daratumumab 4Z63YK6E0E
Thalidomide 4Z8R6ORS6L
Bortezomib 69G8BD63PP
ixazomib 71050168A2
carfilzomib 72X6E3J5AR
Dexamethasone 7S5I7G3JQL
pomalidomide D2UX06XLB5
Lenalidomide F0P408N6V4
Glycine TE7660XO1C

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

416-427

Subventions

Organisme : Celgene Corporation
Organisme : Canadian Myeloma Research Group Inc

Informations de copyright

© 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Références

Cherniawsky HM, Kukreti V, Reece D, et al. The survival impact of maintenance lenalidomide: an analysis of real-world data from the Canadian Myeloma Research Group national database. Haematologica. 2021;106(6):1733-1736.
Jimenez-Zepeda VH, Mikhael J, Winter A, et al. Second autologous stem cell transplantation as salvage therapy for multiple myeloma: impact on progression-free and overall survival. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012;18(5):773-779.
Attal M, Lauwers-Cances V, Marit G, et al. Lenalidomide maintenance after stem-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(19):1782-1791.
McCarthy PL, Owzar K, Hofmeister CC, et al. Lenalidomide after stem-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(19):1770-1781.
Palumbo A, Cavallo F, Gay F, et al. Autologous transplantation and maintenance therapy in multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(10):895-905.
McCarthy PL, Holstein SA, Petrucci MT, et al. Lenalidomide maintenance after autologous stem-cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(29):3279-3289.
Dimopoulos MA, Lonial S, White D, et al. Elotuzumab plus lenalidomide/dexamethasone for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: ELOQUENT-2 follow-up and post-hoc analyses on progression-free survival and tumour growth. Br J Haematol. 2017;178(6):896-905.
Dimopoulos MA, Oriol A, Nahi H, et al. Daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(14):1319-1331.
Moreau P, Masszi T, Grzasko N, et al. Oral Ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(17):1621-1634.
Stewart AK, Rajkumar SV, Dimopoulos MA, et al. Carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for relapsed multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(2):142-152.
Dimopoulos M, Quach H, Mateos MV, et al. Carfilzomib, dexamethasone, and daratumumab versus carfilzomib and dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (CANDOR): results from a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2020;396(10245):186-197.
Dimopoulos MA, Moreau P, Palumbo A, et al. Carfilzomib and dexamethasone versus bortezomib and dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (ENDEAVOR): a randomised, phase 3, open-label, multicentre study. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(1):27-38.
Spencer A, Lentzsch S, Weisel K, et al. Daratumumab plus bortezomib and dexamethasone versus bortezomib and dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: updated analysis of CASTOR. Haematologica. 2018;103(12):2079-2087.
Richardson PG, Oriol A, Beksac M, et al. Pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma previously treated with lenalidomide (OPTIMISMM): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(6):781-794.
Kumar S, Paiva B, Anderson KC, et al. International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(8):e328-e346.
Fonseca R, Bergsagel PL, Drach J, et al. International Myeloma Working Group molecular classification of multiple myeloma: spotlight review. Leukemia. 2009;23(12):2210-2221.
Durie BG, Harousseau JL, Miguel JS, et al. International uniform response criteria for multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2006;20(9):1467-1473.
Goldschmidt H, Baertsch MA, Schlenzka J, et al. Salvage autologous transplant and lenalidomide maintenance vs. lenalidomide/dexamethasone for relapsed multiple myeloma: the randomized GMMG phase III trial ReLApsE. Leukemia. 2021;35(4):1134-1144.
Sanchez L, Moshier E, Coltoff A, et al. Outcomes in multiple myeloma patients progressing on lenalidomide maintenance. Blood. 2019;134:1779.
Kunacheewa C, Feng L, Manasanch EE, et al. Outcomes of lenalidomide retreatment with novel triplet regimens in multiple myeloma patients progressing on lenalidomide-based maintenance therapy: a single center retrospective analysis. Blood. 2019;134(Supplement_1):3198.
Dimopoulos MA, Goldschmidt H, Niesvizky R, et al. Carfilzomib or bortezomib in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (ENDEAVOR): an interim overall survival analysis of an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(10):1327-1337.
Richardson PG, Hungria VT, Yoon SS, et al. Panobinostat plus bortezomib and dexamethasone in previously treated multiple myeloma: outcomes by prior treatment. Blood. 2016;127(6):713-721.
San-Miguel JF, Hungria VT, Yoon SS, et al. Panobinostat plus bortezomib and dexamethasone versus placebo plus bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(11):1195-1206.
Reece DE, Trieu Y, Masih-Khan E, et al. Cyclophosphamide and bortezomib with prednisone or dexamethasone for the treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2016;16(7):387-394.

Auteurs

Donna E Reece (DE)

Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Canadian Myeloma Research Group, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Esther Masih-Khan (E)

Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Canadian Myeloma Research Group, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Ehetu G Atenafu (EG)

Canadian Myeloma Research Group, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Victor H Jimenez-Zepeda (VH)

University of Calgary, Arnie Charbonneau Cancer Institute, Calgary, AB, Canada.

Arleigh McCurdy (A)

The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Kevin Song (K)

BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Richard LeBlanc (R)

Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Research Centre, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Michael Sebag (M)

Departments of Medicine and Oncology, Division of Hematology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Darrell White (D)

Dalhousie University and QEII Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada.

Hannah Cherniawsky (H)

Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

Anthony Reiman (A)

Department of Oncology, Saint John Regional Hospital, Saint John, NB, Canada.

Julie Stakiw (J)

University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.

Martha L Louzada (ML)

London Regional Cancer Center, London, ON, Canada.

Rami Kotb (R)

Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.

Muhammad Aslam (M)

Allan Blair Cancer Centre, Regina, SK, Canada.

Engin Gul (E)

Canadian Myeloma Research Group, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Christopher P Venner (CP)

Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH