A 1-km hourly air-temperature model for 13 northeastern U.S. states using remotely sensed and ground-based measurements.


Journal

Environmental research
ISSN: 1096-0953
Titre abrégé: Environ Res
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0147621

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 2021
Historique:
received: 15 12 2020
revised: 01 06 2021
accepted: 01 06 2021
pubmed: 16 6 2021
medline: 7 9 2021
entrez: 15 6 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Accurate and precise estimates of ambient air temperatures that can capture fine-scale within-day variability are necessary for studies of air temperature and health. We developed statistical models to predict temperature at each hour in each cell of a 927-m square grid across the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic United States from 2003 to 2019, across ~4000 meteorological stations from the Integrated Mesonet, using inputs such as elevation, an inverse-distance-weighted interpolation of temperature, and satellite-based vegetation and land surface temperature. We used a rigorous spatial cross-validation scheme and spatially weighted the errors to estimate how well model predictions would generalize to new cell-days. We assess the within-county association of temperature and social vulnerability in a heat wave as an example application. We found that a model based on the XGBoost machine-learning algorithm was fast and accurate, obtaining weighted root mean square errors (RMSEs) around 1.6 K, compared to standard deviations around 11.0 K. We found similar accuracy when validating our model on an external dataset from Weather Underground. Assessing predictions from the North American Land Data Assimilation System-2 (NLDAS-2), another hourly model, in the same way, we found it was much less accurate, with RMSEs around 2.5 K. This is likely due to the NLDAS-2 model's coarser spatial resolution, and the dynamic variability of temperature within its grid cells. Finally, we demonstrated the health relevance of our model by showing that our temperature estimates were associated with social vulnerability across the region during a heat wave, whereas the NLDAS-2 showed a much weaker association. Our high spatiotemporal resolution air temperature model provides a strong contribution for future health studies in this region.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Accurate and precise estimates of ambient air temperatures that can capture fine-scale within-day variability are necessary for studies of air temperature and health.
METHOD
We developed statistical models to predict temperature at each hour in each cell of a 927-m square grid across the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic United States from 2003 to 2019, across ~4000 meteorological stations from the Integrated Mesonet, using inputs such as elevation, an inverse-distance-weighted interpolation of temperature, and satellite-based vegetation and land surface temperature. We used a rigorous spatial cross-validation scheme and spatially weighted the errors to estimate how well model predictions would generalize to new cell-days. We assess the within-county association of temperature and social vulnerability in a heat wave as an example application.
RESULTS
We found that a model based on the XGBoost machine-learning algorithm was fast and accurate, obtaining weighted root mean square errors (RMSEs) around 1.6 K, compared to standard deviations around 11.0 K. We found similar accuracy when validating our model on an external dataset from Weather Underground. Assessing predictions from the North American Land Data Assimilation System-2 (NLDAS-2), another hourly model, in the same way, we found it was much less accurate, with RMSEs around 2.5 K. This is likely due to the NLDAS-2 model's coarser spatial resolution, and the dynamic variability of temperature within its grid cells. Finally, we demonstrated the health relevance of our model by showing that our temperature estimates were associated with social vulnerability across the region during a heat wave, whereas the NLDAS-2 showed a much weaker association.
CONCLUSION
Our high spatiotemporal resolution air temperature model provides a strong contribution for future health studies in this region.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34129866
pii: S0013-9351(21)00771-4
doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111477
pmc: PMC8403657
mid: NIHMS1716185
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Air Pollutants 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

111477

Subventions

Organisme : NIEHS NIH HHS
ID : L60 ES032218
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : T32 HD049311
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIEHS NIH HHS
ID : R01 ES028805
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIEHS NIH HHS
ID : R00 ES023450
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIEHS NIH HHS
ID : P30 ES009089
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIEHS NIH HHS
ID : P30 ES023515
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIEHS NIH HHS
ID : R01 ES030616
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Références

Nat Mach Intell. 2020 Jan;2(1):56-67
pubmed: 32607472
Epidemiology. 2009 Sep;20(5):738-46
pubmed: 19593155
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Oct;119:195-201
pubmed: 30048841
Int J Climatol. 2021 Jun 30;41(8):4095-4111
pubmed: 34248276
Epidemiology. 2018 Nov;29(6):749-752
pubmed: 30074541
Environ Pollut. 2017 Jun;225:700-712
pubmed: 28284544
J Psychiatr Res. 2019 Mar;110:57-63
pubmed: 30594025
Atmos Meas Tech. 2020;13(9):4669-4681
pubmed: 33193906
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 16;15(1):e0227480
pubmed: 31945081
Am J Epidemiol. 2016 Feb 15;183(4):286-93
pubmed: 26811244
Environ Int. 2020 Oct;143:105910
pubmed: 32622116
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 07;10(12):e0143619
pubmed: 26641818
Biometrics. 2006 Dec;62(4):1025-36
pubmed: 17156276
Environ Health Perspect. 2015 Jul;123(7):672-8
pubmed: 25782056
Am J Public Health. 2013 Apr;103(4):e32-4
pubmed: 23409876
Lancet. 2015 Jul 25;386(9991):369-75
pubmed: 26003380
J Environ Health. 2018 Jun;80(10):34-36
pubmed: 32327766
Atmos Environ (1994). 2020 Oct 15;239:
pubmed: 33122961
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Oct;167:1-10
pubmed: 27592003
Nat Clim Chang. 2015 Nov;5:988-991
pubmed: 26640524

Auteurs

Daniel Carrión (D)

Department of Environmental Medicine and Public Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: daniel.carrion@mssm.edu.

Kodi B Arfer (KB)

Department of Environmental Medicine and Public Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.

Johnathan Rush (J)

Department of Environmental Medicine and Public Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.

Michael Dorman (M)

Department of Geography and Environmental Development, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.

Sebastian T Rowland (ST)

Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Columbia University, New York, USA.

Marianthi-Anna Kioumourtzoglou (MA)

Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Columbia University, New York, USA.

Itai Kloog (I)

Department of Environmental Medicine and Public Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; Department of Geography and Environmental Development, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.

Allan C Just (AC)

Department of Environmental Medicine and Public Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; Institute for Exposomic Research, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA.

Articles similaires

Humans Meta-Analysis as Topic Sample Size Models, Statistical Computer Simulation
India Carbon Sequestration Environmental Monitoring Carbon Biomass
Rivers Turkey Biodiversity Environmental Monitoring Animals
1.00
Iran Environmental Monitoring Seasons Ecosystem Forests

Classifications MeSH