Metastatic bone disease: new quality performance indicator development.

Clinical decisions bone breast chronic conditions lung prostate

Journal

BMJ supportive & palliative care
ISSN: 2045-4368
Titre abrégé: BMJ Support Palliat Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101565123

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 Jun 2021
Historique:
received: 25 02 2021
accepted: 28 05 2021
entrez: 16 6 2021
pubmed: 17 6 2021
medline: 17 6 2021
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Patients with metastatic bone disease (MBD) should receive the same standard of care regardless of which centre they are treated in. The aim was to develop and test a set of quality performance indicators (QPIs) to evaluate care for patients with MBD referred to orthopaedics. QPIs were adapted from the literature and ranked on feasibility and necessity during a modified RAND/Delphi consensus process. They were then validated and field tested in a retrospective cohort of 108 patients using indicator-specific targets set during consensus. 2568 articles including six guidelines were reviewed. 43 quality objectives were extracted and 40 proceeded to expert consensus. After two rounds, 18 QPIs for MBD care were generated, with the following generating the highest consensus: 'Patients with high fracture risk should receive urgent assessment' (combined mean 6.7/7, 95% CI 6.5 to 6.8) and 'preoperative workup should include full blood tests including group and save' (combined mean 6.7/7, 95% CI 6.5 to 6.9). In the pilot test, targets were met for 5/18 QPIs (mean 52%, standard deviation 22%). The median deviation from projected target was -14% (interquartile range -11% to -31%, range -74% to 11%). The highest scoring QPI was 'adults with fractures should have surgery within 7 days' (target 80%:actual 92%). The published evidence and guidelines were adapted into a set of validated QPIs for MBD care which can be used to evaluate variation in care between centres. These QPIs should be correlated with outcome scores to determine whether they can act as predictors of outcome after surgery.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34130998
pii: bmjspcare-2021-003025
doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-003025
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Auteurs

Samantha Downie (S)

Trauma & Orthopaedics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK sdownie04@gmail.com.

Jennifer Cherry (J)

Trauma & Orthopaedics, NHS Tayside, Dundee, UK.

Peter Hall (P)

University of Edinburgh Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.

Alison Stillie (A)

Clinical Oncology, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK.

Matthew Moran (M)

Trauma & Orthopaedics, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK.

Cathie Sudlow (C)

Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.

A Hamish Rw Simpson (AHR)

Trauma & Orthopaedics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Classifications MeSH