Clinical and Electroencephalography Assessment of the Effects of Brivaracetam in the Treatment of Drug-Resistant Focal Epilepsy.

brivaracetam focal drug resistant epilepsy levetiracetam neurocognitive tests pharmaco-eeg quantitative eeg

Journal

Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
13 May 2021
Historique:
entrez: 16 6 2021
pubmed: 17 6 2021
medline: 17 6 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Our aim was to evaluate the clinical and electroencephalographic effects of brivaracetam (BRV) in patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. BRV is a new antiepileptic drug (AED) with a high affinity for vesicle protein 2A (SV2A) and recently approved as adjunctive therapy for focal onset seizures. In this observational study of six-month duration, BRV (50-200 mg) was administered to 76 patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy, who were ≥16-year-old and who suffered from daily, weekly, monthly and yearly recurrent seizures. At baseline and after six months of follow-up, we performed a neurological visit, neuropsychological tests: Quality of life in epilepsy-31 (QOLIE31), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Intrapersonal Emotional Quotient (IEQ) and an electroencephalogram (EEG; inspective and quantitative analysis). Twenty-four patients underwent an overnight switch from levetiracetam (LEV) to BRV. Seizure frequency of the 54 patients remaining at six months was reduced >50% in 29.6% of cases (responders), <50% in 31.5% (non-responders 1), while it remained unchanged in 38.8% (non-responders 2). Twenty-nine percent of patients early discontinued BRV because of lack of efficacy or minor adverse effects (AEs) like irritability, asthenia or headache. Neuropsychological tests in 28 patients demonstrated a significant improvement in I-EPI scores (p=0.04). Comparable results have been found in the subgroup of patients who switched from LEV to BRV. The EEG quantitative analysis showed a significant reduction of alpha absolute power at six months (p=0.03). Theta band power resulted significantly superior in non-responders than in responders (p=0.03). Furthermore, the δ+θ/α+β index resulted more elevated in patients with AEs than in patients without. BRV showed discrete results in terms of efficacy, safety and tolerability, with a good behavioural profile. BRV reduces the power of the alpha band, in correlation with its sedative effects but not with its minor efficacy. Furthermore, the increase in theta band power can be considered as a predictor of scarce response to treatment, while an increase in the δ+θ/α+β index could be a possible predictor of AEs occurrence.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34131547
doi: 10.7759/cureus.15012
pmc: PMC8197576
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e15012

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021, Savastano et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Clin Neuropharmacol. 2001 Sep-Oct;24(5):284-9
pubmed: 11586113
Epilepsy Behav. 2016 Dec;65:13-17
pubmed: 27838562
Neurology. 2016 Jul 19;87(3):314-23
pubmed: 27335114
Seizure. 2018 Nov;62:49-54
pubmed: 30278348
Epilepsia. 2017 Apr;58(4):522-530
pubmed: 28276060
Epilepsy Behav. 2011 Jul;21(3):275-81
pubmed: 21624849
Epilepsy Curr. 2014 Jul;14(4):196-8
pubmed: 25170316
Epilepsy Behav. 2020 Jan;102:106661
pubmed: 31766003
Curr Pharm Des. 2011;17(26):2808-28
pubmed: 21827408
Seizure. 2017 May;48:11-14
pubmed: 28364655
Epilepsy Behav. 2017 Apr;69:80-85
pubmed: 28236727
N Engl J Med. 2011 Sep 8;365(10):919-26
pubmed: 21899452
Epilepsia. 2016 Jul;57(7):1130-8
pubmed: 27221208
Epilepsy Res. 2016 Dec;128:163-168
pubmed: 27842261
Epilepsia. 2002 May;43(5):482-90
pubmed: 12027908
Neuropsychobiology. 2012;66(4):201-20
pubmed: 23075830
Epilepsy Res. 2010 Jan;88(1):46-54
pubmed: 19914041
Epilepsy Res. 2007 Jul;75(2-3):192-6
pubmed: 17628429
Epilepsia. 2003 Aug;44(8):1042-50
pubmed: 12887435
Ann Pharmacother. 2004 Nov;38(11):1816-22
pubmed: 15367726
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2016;17(2):283-95
pubmed: 26760311
Epilepsia. 2013 Aug;54 Suppl 4:61-9
pubmed: 23909854
Epilepsia. 2005 Feb;46(2):224-35
pubmed: 15679503
Epilepsia. 2010 Jun;51(6):1069-77
pubmed: 19889013
Epilepsia. 2016 Jul;57(7):1139-51
pubmed: 27265725
Epilepsy Behav. 2015 Nov;52(Pt A):165-8
pubmed: 26432008
Acta Neurol Scand. 2019 Apr;139(4):360-368
pubmed: 30506559
Epilepsia. 2014 Jan;55(1):57-66
pubmed: 24446953
Epilepsia. 2018 Dec;59(12):2179-2193
pubmed: 30426482

Auteurs

Ersilia Savastano (E)

UOC Neurologia, Ospedale Santo Bono-Pausilipon, Napoli, ITA.
UOC Neurofisiopatologia, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, ITA.

Patrizia Pulitano (P)

Department of Human Neuroscience, Neurophysiopathology Unit, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, ITA.

Maria Teresa Faedda (MT)

Department of Human Neuroscience, Neurophysiopathology Unit, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, ITA.

Leonardo Davì (L)

Department of Human Neuroscience, Neurophysiopathology Unit, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, ITA.

Nicola Vanacore (N)

CNAPS Department (Promotion and Evaluation of Chronic Disease Prevention Policies), Istituto Superiore di Sanità (ISS), Rome, ITA.

Oriano Mecarelli (O)

Department of Human Neuroscience, Neurophysiopathology Unit, Policlinico Umberto I, University of Rome "Sapienza", Rome, ITA.

Classifications MeSH