Florivory of Early Cretaceous flowers by functionally diverse insects: implications for early angiosperm pollination.
florivory
fossil plant damage
functional-feeding group
generalist
nectar robbing
pollination
Journal
Proceedings. Biological sciences
ISSN: 1471-2954
Titre abrégé: Proc Biol Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101245157
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 06 2021
30 06 2021
Historique:
entrez:
16
6
2021
pubmed:
17
6
2021
medline:
4
8
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Florivory (flower consumption) occurs worldwide in modern angiosperms, associated with pollen and nectar consumption. However, florivory remains unrecorded from fossil flowers since their Early Cretaceous appearance. We test hypotheses that earliest angiosperms were pollinated by a diverse insect fauna by evaluating 7858 plants from eight localities of the latest Albian Dakota Formation from midcontinental North America, in which 645 specimens (8.2%) were flowers or inflorescences. Well-preserved specimens were categorized into 32 morphotypes, nine of which displayed 207 instances of damage from 11 insect damage types (DTs) by four functional-feeding groups of hole feeding, margin feeding, surface feeding and piercing-and-sucking. We assessed the same DTs inflicted by known florivores on modern flowers that also are their pollinators, and associated insect mouthpart types causing such damage. The diverse, Dakota florivore-pollinator community showed a local pattern at Braun's Ranch of flower morphotypes 4 and 5 having piercing-and-sucking as dominant and margin feeding as minor interactions, whereas
Identifiants
pubmed: 34132112
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.0320
pmc: PMC8207559
doi:
Banques de données
figshare
['10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5448682']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
20210320Références
Cladistics. 2015 Dec;31(6):621-651
pubmed: 34753270
Nat Commun. 2017 Aug 01;8:16047
pubmed: 28763051
Cladistics. 2012 Feb;28(1):50-79
pubmed: 34861758
Annu Rev Entomol. 2017 Jan 31;62:265-283
pubmed: 27860521
Trends Ecol Evol. 1992 Feb;7(2):46-9
pubmed: 21235949
New Phytol. 2015 Jul;207(2):437-453
pubmed: 25615647
J Chem Ecol. 2006 May;32(5):917-27
pubmed: 16739013
Science. 1984 May 4;224(4648):511-3
pubmed: 17753776
Oecologia. 2016 Dec;182(4):933-946
pubmed: 27538674
Ann Bot. 2014 Jan;113(2):213-22
pubmed: 24052554
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 May 29;109(22):8623-8
pubmed: 22615414
Science. 1976 Feb 27;191(4229):854-6
pubmed: 17730999
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37289
pubmed: 22655038
Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Jan 30;280(1755):20122686
pubmed: 23363629
Ecol Lett. 2013 Mar;16(3):299-306
pubmed: 23173705
iScience. 2020 Mar 27;23(3):100913
pubmed: 32191877
Ecol Evol. 2014 Jun;4(11):2278-301
pubmed: 25360267
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Dec 6;91(25):12278-82
pubmed: 11607501
Arthropod Plant Interact. 2015 Dec;9(6):613-622
pubmed: 26811740
Ecol Lett. 2006 Dec;9(12):1351-65
pubmed: 17118009