Comparative Performances of Vitek-2, Disk Diffusion, and Broth Microdilution for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Canine Staphylococcus pseudintermedius.
Staphylococcus pseudintermedius
Vitek-2
antimicrobial susceptibility testing
broth microdilution
categorical agreement
comparative studies
disk diffusion
essential agreement
reproducibility
Journal
Journal of clinical microbiology
ISSN: 1098-660X
Titre abrégé: J Clin Microbiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7505564
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 08 2021
18 08 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
17
6
2021
medline:
20
2
2022
entrez:
16
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Staphylococcus pseudintermedius is the primary cause of canine cutaneous infections and is sporadically isolated as a pathogen from humans. Rapidly emerging antibiotic-resistant strains are creating serious health concerns so that accurate and timely antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is crucial for patient care. Here, the performances of the AST methods Vitek-2, disk diffusion (DD) and broth microdilution (BMD) were compared for the determination of susceptibility of 79 S. pseudintermedius isolates from canine cutaneous infections and one from human pyoderma to oxacillin (OXA), amoxicillin/clavulanate (AMC), cephalothin (CEF), gentamicin (GEN), enrofloxacin (ENR), doxycycline (DOX), clindamycin (CLI), inducible clindamycin resistance (ICR), mupirocin (MUP), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT). Overall, the agreement of DD and Vitek-2 using the veterinary AST-GP80 card with reference BMD was ≥90%, suggesting reliable AST performances. While DD generated mainly minor errors and one major error for OXA, Vitek-2 produced one very major error for GEN, and it failed in identifying one ICR-positive isolate. Moreover, five bacteria were diagnosed as ICR-positive by Vitek-2, but they showed a noninduction resistance phenotype with manual methods. All S. pseudintermedius isolates were interpreted as susceptible or intermediately susceptible to DOX using CLSI breakpoints for human staphylococci that match the DOX concentration range included in AST-GP80. However, this could lead to inappropriate antimicrobial prescription for S. pseudintermedius infections in companion animals. Considering the clinical and epidemiological importance of S. pseudintermedius, we encourage updating action by the system manufacturer to address AST for this bacterium.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34132581
doi: 10.1128/JCM.00349-21
pmc: PMC8373018
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Bacterial Agents
0
Oxacillin
UH95VD7V76
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0034921Références
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22(3):276-82
pubmed: 23092060
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016 Aug;85(4):471-6
pubmed: 27241371
PeerJ. 2020 May 11;8:e8963
pubmed: 32435531
Vet Dermatol. 2012 Aug;23(4):361-8, e65
pubmed: 22364681
J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Mar 26;56(4):
pubmed: 29367292
J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Sep;45(9):2917-22
pubmed: 17634301
J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Apr;42(4):1800-2
pubmed: 15071055
J Clin Microbiol. 2005 Aug;43(8):3829-34
pubmed: 16081919
J Clin Microbiol. 2016 Mar;54(3):535-42
pubmed: 26607988
J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Jul;47(7):2013-7
pubmed: 19420170
Vet Microbiol. 2019 Jul;234:101-109
pubmed: 31213265
Vet Dermatol. 2012 Aug;23(4):253-66, e51-2
pubmed: 22515504
J Clin Microbiol. 2014 Sep;52(9):3196-9
pubmed: 24951799
J Clin Microbiol. 2014 Nov;52(11):4087-9
pubmed: 25210074
Pathology. 2013 Feb;45(2):181-4
pubmed: 23277176
J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Feb;47(2):469-71
pubmed: 19091817
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012 Mar;72(3):291-4
pubmed: 22322000
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011 Dec;66(12):2705-14
pubmed: 21930571
J Hosp Infect. 2006 May;63 Suppl 1:S1-44
pubmed: 16581155
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008 Nov;62(5):1018-23
pubmed: 18765413
J Clin Microbiol. 2005 Apr;43(4):1716-21
pubmed: 15814990
J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Sep;47(9):2879-82
pubmed: 19625483
J Clin Microbiol. 2014 Feb;52(2):392-7
pubmed: 24478467
J Clin Microbiol. 2002 May;40(5):1681-6
pubmed: 11980942
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2005 Feb;11(2):150-3
pubmed: 15679491