Qualitative Analysis of Single-Site Headache Surgery: Is It Different From Multiple-Site Surgery?
Journal
Annals of plastic surgery
ISSN: 1536-3708
Titre abrégé: Ann Plast Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7805336
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 07 2021
01 07 2021
Historique:
entrez:
16
6
2021
pubmed:
17
6
2021
medline:
29
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Migraine surgery has been shown to be efficacious, but nuanced effects of surgery on pain and individuals' lives remain incompletely understood. Surgery may be performed at a single or multiple "primary" sites. The aims of this study were to investigate patient perceptions following single-site surgery and compare themes in patients undergoing single-site surgery with those from a previously published conceptual framework generated with patients undergoing multisite surgery. Patients who underwent single-site headache surgery participated in open-ended interviews at least 1 year after surgery. Participants (n = 14) had undergone either occipital, temporal, or nasoseptal site surgery. A multidisciplinary team analyzed transcripts. Recurring themes were identified and compared and contrasted to those observed in patients who underwent multiple-site surgery (n = 15) in a previous study (Plast Reconstr Surg 2019;144(4):956-964). Similar recurring themes emerged from the single-site cohort, and the conceptual framework was applicable to all participants. Two new themes emerged from the single-site analysis. First, 5 of 14 participants described being "migraine-free" postoperatively, a finding not observed in the multisite group. Second, several individuals described financial benefits after surgery, via decreased prescription medication requirements, raises at work, and improved productivity. Single-site headache surgery appears to positively impact patients' lives in ways that support and expand upon previously published outcomes. Patients undergoing surgery at a single site may be more likely to experience a "pain-free" state, which may relate to the underlying pathophysiology of chronic headache. The effect of surgery on finances appears to be an outcome of interest to patients, which should be explored further.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Migraine surgery has been shown to be efficacious, but nuanced effects of surgery on pain and individuals' lives remain incompletely understood. Surgery may be performed at a single or multiple "primary" sites. The aims of this study were to investigate patient perceptions following single-site surgery and compare themes in patients undergoing single-site surgery with those from a previously published conceptual framework generated with patients undergoing multisite surgery.
METHODS
Patients who underwent single-site headache surgery participated in open-ended interviews at least 1 year after surgery. Participants (n = 14) had undergone either occipital, temporal, or nasoseptal site surgery. A multidisciplinary team analyzed transcripts. Recurring themes were identified and compared and contrasted to those observed in patients who underwent multiple-site surgery (n = 15) in a previous study (Plast Reconstr Surg 2019;144(4):956-964).
RESULTS
Similar recurring themes emerged from the single-site cohort, and the conceptual framework was applicable to all participants. Two new themes emerged from the single-site analysis. First, 5 of 14 participants described being "migraine-free" postoperatively, a finding not observed in the multisite group. Second, several individuals described financial benefits after surgery, via decreased prescription medication requirements, raises at work, and improved productivity.
CONCLUSIONS
Single-site headache surgery appears to positively impact patients' lives in ways that support and expand upon previously published outcomes. Patients undergoing surgery at a single site may be more likely to experience a "pain-free" state, which may relate to the underlying pathophysiology of chronic headache. The effect of surgery on finances appears to be an outcome of interest to patients, which should be explored further.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34133367
doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002828
pii: 00000637-202107000-00013
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
73-79Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflicts of interest and sources of funding: none declared.
Références
Afifi AM, Schwarze ML, Stilp EK, et al. “Like a normal person again”: a qualitative analysis of the impact of headache surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;144:956–964.
Murray CJ, Vos T, Lozano R, et al. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet Lond Engl. 2012;380:2197–2223.
Lantéri-Minet M, Duru G, Mudge M, et al. Quality of life impairment, disability and economic burden associated with chronic daily headache, focusing on chronic migraine with or without medication overuse: a systematic review. Cephalalgia Int J Headache. 2011;31:837–850.
Guyuron B, Kriegler JS, Davis J, et al. Comprehensive surgical treatment of migraine headaches. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115:1–9.
Guyuron B, Reed D, Kriegler JS, et al. A placebo-controlled surgical trial of the treatment of migraine headaches. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:461–468.
Janis JE, Barker JC, Javadi C, et al. A review of current evidence in the surgical treatment of migraine headaches. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134(4 suppl 2):131S–141S.
Janis JE, Dhanik A, Howard JH. Validation of the peripheral trigger point theory of migraine headaches: single-surgeon experience using botulinum toxin and surgical decompression. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:123–131.
Ducic I, Felder JM, Fantus SA. A systematic review of peripheral nerve interventional treatments for chronic headaches. Ann Plast Surg. 2014;72:439–445.
Gfrerer L, Raposio E, Ortiz R, et al. Surgical treatment of migraine headache: back to the future. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;142:1036–1045.
Guyuron B, Tucker T, Davis J. Surgical treatment of migraine headaches. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109:2183–2189.
Guyuron B, Kriegler JS, Davis J, et al. Five-year outcome of surgical treatment of migraine headaches. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:603–608.
Poggi JT, Grizzell BE, Helmer SD. Confirmation of surgical decompression to relieve migraine headaches. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122:115–122; discussion 123–124.
Jhingran P, Osterhaus JT, Miller DW, et al. Development and validation of the migraine-specific quality of life questionnaire. Headache. 1998;38:295–302.
Bagley CL, Rendas-Baum R, Maglinte GA, et al. Validating Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire v2.1 in episodic and chronic migraine. Headache. 2012;52:409–421.
Stewart WF, Lipton RB, Dowson AJ, et al. Development and testing of the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire to assess headache-related disability. Neurology. 2001;56(6 suppl 1):S20–S28.
Stewart WF, Lipton RB, Kolodner KB, et al. Validity of the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) score in comparison to a diary-based measure in a population sample of migraine sufferers. Pain. 2000;88:41–52.
Nicholas MK, McGuire BE, Asghari A. A 2-item short form of the Pain Self-efficacy Questionnaire: development and psychometric evaluation of PSEQ-2. J Pain Off J Am Pain Soc. 2015;16:153–163.
Gfrerer L, Lans J, Faulkner HR, et al. Ability to cope with pain puts migraine surgery patients in perspective. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;141:169–174.
Larson K, Lee M, Davis J, et al. Factors contributing to migraine headache surgery failure and success. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:1069–1075.
Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15:1277–1288.
Faber C, Garcia RM, Davis J, et al. A socioeconomic analysis of surgical treatment of migraine headaches. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:871–877.
American Migraine Foundation. The burden of migraine. Available at: http://www.americanmigrainefoundation.org. Accessed September 29, 2020.
Ferrari MD. The economic burden of migraine to society. Pharmacoeconomics. 1998;13:667–676.
Hu XH, Markson LE, Lipton RB, et al. Burden of migraine in the United States: disability and economic costs. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:813–818.
Stewart WF, Wood C, Reed ML, et al. AMPP advisory group. Cumulative lifetime migraine incidence in women and men. Cephalalgia Int J Headache. 2008;28:1170–1178.
Charles A. The pathophysiology of migraine: implications for clinical management. Lancet Neurol. 2018;17:174–182.
Lauritzen M, Dreier JP, Fabricius M, et al. Clinical relevance of cortical spreading depression in neurological disorders: migraine, malignant stroke, subarachnoid and intracranial hemorrhage, and traumatic brain injury. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2011;31:17–35.
Fioravanti B, Kasasbeh A, Edelmayer R, et al. Evaluation of cutaneous allodynia following induction of cortical spreading depression in freely moving rats. Cephalalgia Int J Headache. 2011;31:1090–1100.
Cesmebasi A, Muhleman MA, Hulsberg P, et al. Occipital neuralgia: anatomic considerations. Clin Anat. 2015;28:101–108.
Ducic I, Felder JM, Khan N, et al. Greater occipital nerve excision for occipital neuralgia refractory to nerve decompression. Ann Plast Surg. 2014;72:184–187.
Goadsby PJ, Holland PR, Martins-Oliveira M, et al. Pathophysiology of migraine: a disorder of sensory processing. Physiol Rev. 2017;97:553–622.