Comparison of regression for blood ALP levels using methods of the Japan Society of Clinical Chemistry and the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine in bovine, canine, feline, and human testing.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
24
12
2020
accepted:
03
06
2021
entrez:
16
6
2021
pubmed:
17
6
2021
medline:
16
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Livestock and companion animal health have a direct impact on human health. Research on clinical laboratory technology for veterinary medicine is as important as that on human laboratory technology. Reagents and analysis equipment for human medical laboratory tests are often used in veterinary medicine. Medical laboratories in Japan utilize the Japan Society of Clinical Chemistry (JSCC) method for blood alkaline phosphatase (ALP) analysis. The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) method is used worldwide for ALP catalytic concentration measurement. When the IFCC method is used, human blood ALP activity is approximately one-third of the JSCC method's activity. The JSCC method for ALP measurement was switched to the IFCC method in medical laboratories in Japan in April 2020 for global standardization purpose. It is uncertain whether conventional JSCC method reagents will continue to be supplied. In veterinary medicine, the relationship between the JSCC and IFCC methods in terms of ALP measurement is almost unclear. This study investigated the regression between JSCC and IFCC methods measuring ALP in bovine, canine, feline, and human. The regression formulas for bovine, canine, feline, and human ALP values using the conventional JSCC (x) and IFCC (y) methods are y = 0.379x + 0.124, y = 0.289x + 8.291, y = 0.358x + 0.432, and y = 0.337x + 2.959, respectively. These results suggested that the IFCC method measurement could be estimated by approximately one-third of the JSCC method measurement in animal species such as bovine, canine, and feline. By applying the conversion factors proposed in this study, a very good correlation could be obtained between the two methods for each animal.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34133462
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253396
pii: PONE-D-20-40450
pmc: PMC8208544
doi:
Substances chimiques
Alkaline Phosphatase
EC 3.1.3.1
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0253396Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have read the journal’s policies, and the authors of the study have the following competing interests to declare: MaT was a paid employee of Ehime Rinken Inc. during the time of the study. Ehime Rinken Inc. also provided the human blood samples for this study. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. There are no patents, products in development or marketed products associated with this research to declare.
Références
J Vet Med Sci. 2005 Aug;67(8):813-5
pubmed: 16141669
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011 Sep;49(9):1439-46
pubmed: 21702699
Vet Clin Pathol. 2007 Sep;36(3):223-33
pubmed: 17806069
J Vet Med Sci. 2020 Oct 30;82(10):1523-1528
pubmed: 32908039
Pol J Vet Sci. 2019 Dec;22(4):789-792
pubmed: 31867924
Pol J Vet Sci. 2020 Jun;23(2):317-319
pubmed: 32627994
Jpn J Vet Res. 1998 May;46(1):3-11
pubmed: 9642875
J Vet Med Sci. 2016 Feb;78(2):301-3
pubmed: 26346653
Nihon Naika Gakkai Zasshi. 2013 Dec 10;102(12):3088-95
pubmed: 24605555
Can J Vet Res. 1992 Oct;56(4):373-5
pubmed: 1477806