Repeated Exposure to Illusory Sense of Body Ownership and Agency Over a Moving Virtual Body Improves Executive Functioning and Increases Prefrontal Cortex Activity in the Elderly.

Stroop task dorsolateral prefrontal cortex executive functions functional near-infrared spectroscopy immersive virtual reality sense of agency sense of body ownership virtual intervention

Journal

Frontiers in human neuroscience
ISSN: 1662-5161
Titre abrégé: Front Hum Neurosci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101477954

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 01 03 2021
accepted: 06 04 2021
entrez: 17 6 2021
pubmed: 18 6 2021
medline: 18 6 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

We previously showed that the illusory sense of ownership and agency over a moving body in immersive virtual reality (displayed in a first-person perspective) can trigger subjective and physiological reactions on the real subject's body and, therefore, an acute improvement of cognitive functions after a single session of high-intensity intermittent exercise performed exclusively by one's own virtual body, similar to what happens when we actually do physical activity. As well as confirming previous results, here, we aimed at finding in the elderly an increased improvement after a longer virtual training with similar characteristics. Forty-two healthy older subjects (28 females, average age = 71.71 years) completed a parallel-group randomized controlled trial (RCT; UMIN000039843, umin.ac.jp) including an adapted version of the virtual training previously used: while sitting, participants observed the virtual body in a first-person perspective (1PP) or a third-person perspective (3PP) performing 20 min of virtual high-intensity intermittent exercise (vHIE; the avatar switched between fast and slow walking every 2 min). This was repeated twice a week for 6 weeks. During the vHIE, we measured the heart rate and administered questionnaires to evaluate illusory body ownership and agency. Before the beginning of the intervention, immediately after the first session of vHIE, and at the end of the entire intervention, we evaluated the cognitive performance at the Stroop task with online recording of the hemodynamic activity over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. While we confirm previous results regarding the virtual illusion and its physiological effects, we did not find significant cognitive or neural improvement immediately after the first vHIE session. As a novelty, in the 1PP group only, we detected a significant decrease in the response time of the Stroop task in the post-intervention assessment compared to its baseline; coherently, we found an increased activation on left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (lDLPFC) after the entire intervention. While the current results strengthen the impact of the virtual full-body illusion and its physiological consequences on the elderly as well, they might have stronger and more established body representations. Perhaps, a longer and increased exposure to those illusions is necessary to initiate the cascade of events that culminates to an improved cognitive performance.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34135743
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.674326
pmc: PMC8200494
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

674326

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Burin and Kawashima.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Neuropsychologia. 2010 Jul;48(9):2740-9
pubmed: 20510255
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Dec 9;111(49):17678-83
pubmed: 25422444
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 15;11(12):e0168489
pubmed: 27977783
Neuroimage. 2020 Nov 15;222:117297
pubmed: 32828927
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 25;9(1):2663
pubmed: 30804474
Braz J Phys Ther. 2018 Sep - Oct;22(5):383-390
pubmed: 29653903
Neurobiol Aging. 2012 Nov;33(11):2621-32
pubmed: 22300952
Cortex. 2021 Feb;135:268-284
pubmed: 33418321
Exp Brain Res. 1996 Feb;108(1):129-39
pubmed: 8721161
Conscious Cogn. 2014 May;26:117-32
pubmed: 24705182
Med Phys. 1995 Dec;22(12):1997-2005
pubmed: 8746704
Conscious Cogn. 2013 Sep;22(3):779-87
pubmed: 23727712
Neuroimage. 2014 Sep;98:336-45
pubmed: 24799137
Conscious Cogn. 2015 Nov;36:277-88
pubmed: 26196450
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2020 Feb;56(1):47-57
pubmed: 31615196
Neuroimage. 2002 Mar;15(3):596-603
pubmed: 11848702
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Feb;48(3):669-80
pubmed: 19786038
Science. 2007 Aug 24;317(5841):1048
pubmed: 17717177
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Jul 31;7:438
pubmed: 23914172
Eur Rev Aging Phys Act. 2020 Jul 2;17:9
pubmed: 32636957
Hum Brain Mapp. 2002 Sep;17(1):61-71
pubmed: 12203689
Conscious Cogn. 2006 Jun;15(2):423-32
pubmed: 16343947
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 16;10(3):e0117155
pubmed: 25775041
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Nov 29;10:601
pubmed: 27965555
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Feb;48(3):703-12
pubmed: 19819247
J Psychopharmacol. 2019 Oct;33(10):1264-1273
pubmed: 31294651
J Clin Med. 2020 Jan 21;9(2):
pubmed: 31973014
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2018 Jul 10;4:252-262
pubmed: 30094329
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Sep 2;105(35):13169-73
pubmed: 18725630
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2016 Feb-Mar;33(1-2):112-9
pubmed: 27314302
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40867
pubmed: 22829891
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011 May;35(6):1305-25
pubmed: 21315758
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012 Jan;36(1):34-46
pubmed: 21477616
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2017 Jun;29(3):387-394
pubmed: 27256080
Behav Brain Res. 2014 Mar 15;261:275-81
pubmed: 24412686
J Exp Neurosci. 2019 May 16;13:1179069519849907
pubmed: 31205423
Circulation. 1996 Mar 1;93(5):1043-65
pubmed: 8598068
Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Jan;4(1):14-21
pubmed: 10637618
Perception. 2009;38(2):271-80
pubmed: 19400435
Conscious Cogn. 2018 Feb;58:186-192
pubmed: 29305042
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2001 May;90(5):1657-62
pubmed: 11299252
Conscious Cogn. 2018 Mar;59:32-39
pubmed: 29413873
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2000 Dec 29;355(1404):1771-88
pubmed: 11205340
Science. 2000 Jun 9;288(5472):1835-8
pubmed: 10846167
Front Psychol. 2020 May 08;11:820
pubmed: 32457681
Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Dec 9;:
pubmed: 33300113
Cognition. 2019 Mar;184:1-10
pubmed: 30553934
Br J Psychol. 2018 Aug;109(3):431-433
pubmed: 29781508
Front Psychol. 2018 Jun 11;9:917
pubmed: 29942270
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Mar 21;7:83
pubmed: 23519597
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Jan;77(1):207-19
pubmed: 25120179
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Apr;185:219-228
pubmed: 29533775
Trials. 2019 Sep 11;20(1):559
pubmed: 31511036
Brain Res. 2010 Jun 23;1341:12-24
pubmed: 20381468
Am Psychol. 1999 Jul;54(7):480-92
pubmed: 10424155
Front Psychol. 2019 Dec 10;10:2762
pubmed: 31920815
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017 Apr;18(4):196-207
pubmed: 28251993
Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(4):507-17
pubmed: 16098997
Conscious Cogn. 2012 Dec;21(4):1725-38
pubmed: 23123685
Conscious Cogn. 2018 Feb;58:90-96
pubmed: 29103810
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 May 19;9:287
pubmed: 26042020
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2019 Jul;2019:118-121
pubmed: 31945858
Phys Med Biol. 1988 Dec;33(12):1433-42
pubmed: 3237772
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018 Mar;86:207-225
pubmed: 29175306
Comput Math Methods Med. 2018 Apr 30;2018:3543048
pubmed: 29853984
J Aging Phys Act. 2017 Apr;25(2):234-239
pubmed: 27705074
Neuroimage. 2010 May 1;50(4):1702-10
pubmed: 20006719
Neuroimage. 2001 Jan;13(1):29-36
pubmed: 11133306
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2018 May;21(5):304-310
pubmed: 29762066
Exp Brain Res. 2021 Mar 30;:
pubmed: 33783561
Front Robot AI. 2020 Mar 18;7:31
pubmed: 33501199
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 15;11(1):1581
pubmed: 33452351
Games Health J. 2018 Feb;7(1):24-36
pubmed: 29239677
Lancet. 2016 Sep 17;388(10050):1170-82
pubmed: 27524393
Brain. 2005 Feb;128(Pt 2):277-90
pubmed: 15548555
Cogn Process. 2017 Nov;18(4):349-357
pubmed: 28780698
Front Aging Neurosci. 2019 Jul 16;11:162
pubmed: 31379553
Neuroimage. 2018 Apr 1;169:117-125
pubmed: 29203453
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004 Mar;133(1):101-135
pubmed: 14979754
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 3;14(1):e0209899
pubmed: 30605454
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl. 1999;52:3-6
pubmed: 10590970
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 May 1;18(5):454.e1-454.e9
pubmed: 28238675
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Mar 14;6:40
pubmed: 22435056
Cognition. 2017 Sep;166:164-173
pubmed: 28577446
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Dec 12;364(1535):3549-57
pubmed: 19884149
Trends Cogn Sci. 2015 Jan;19(1):6-12
pubmed: 25524273
Nature. 1998 Feb 19;391(6669):756
pubmed: 9486643
Sci Rep. 2016 Aug 03;6:30628
pubmed: 27485049
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 15;13(11):e0207528
pubmed: 30440038
Perception. 2009;38(1):69-78
pubmed: 19323137
Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Jul 22;270(1523):1499-506
pubmed: 12965016
J Neurosci. 2016 Jan 13;36(2):268-79
pubmed: 26758821
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jul 30;110(31):12846-51
pubmed: 23858436
Cortex. 2019 Dec;121:169-178
pubmed: 31629195
Eur J Neurosci. 2020 Feb;51(3):937-951
pubmed: 31630450
Brain Sci. 2018 May 11;8(5):
pubmed: 29751661
Biol Psychiatry. 2011 Jun 15;69(12):e89-99
pubmed: 21489408
Sci Rep. 2016 Jul 01;6:28879
pubmed: 27364767
Front Psychol. 2014 Nov 20;5:1327
pubmed: 25477848

Auteurs

Dalila Burin (D)

Department of Advanced Brain Science, Institute of Development, Aging and Cancer, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Smart Aging International Research Center, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.

Ryuta Kawashima (R)

Department of Advanced Brain Science, Institute of Development, Aging and Cancer, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Smart Aging International Research Center, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.

Classifications MeSH