Complication rates and outcomes after outpatient shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Ambulatory Outpatient Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA)

Journal

JSES international
ISSN: 2666-6383
Titre abrégé: JSES Int
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101763461

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
May 2021
Historique:
entrez: 17 6 2021
pubmed: 18 6 2021
medline: 18 6 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

As the number of total shoulder arthroplasties (TSAs) performed annually increases, some surgeons have begun to shift toward performing TSAs in the outpatient setting. However, it is imperative to establish the safety of outpatient TSA. The purpose of this systematic review was to define complication, readmission, and reoperation rates and patient-reported outcomes after outpatient TSA. A systematic review of the literature was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines using three databases (PubMed, Ovid, and Embase). English-language publications describing results on complication rates in patients who underwent TSA in an outpatient or ambulatory setting were included. All nonclinical and deidentified database studies were excluded. Bias assessment was conducted with the methodologic index for nonrandomized studies criteria. Seven studies describing outcomes in outpatient TSA were identified for inclusion. The included studies used varying criteria for selecting patients for an outpatient procedure. The total outpatient 90-day complication rate (commonly including hematomas, wound issues, and nerve palsies) ranged from 7.1%-11.5%. Readmission rates ranged from 0%-3.7%, and emergency and urgent care visits ranged from 2.4%-16.1%. Patient-reported outcomes improved significantly after outpatient TSA in all studies. Two studies found a higher complication rate in the comparative inpatient cohort ( Outpatient TSA in properly selected patients results in a similar complication rate to inpatient TSA. Further studies are needed to aid in determining proper risk stratification to direct patients to inpatient or outpatient shoulder arthroplasty.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
As the number of total shoulder arthroplasties (TSAs) performed annually increases, some surgeons have begun to shift toward performing TSAs in the outpatient setting. However, it is imperative to establish the safety of outpatient TSA. The purpose of this systematic review was to define complication, readmission, and reoperation rates and patient-reported outcomes after outpatient TSA.
METHODS METHODS
A systematic review of the literature was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines using three databases (PubMed, Ovid, and Embase). English-language publications describing results on complication rates in patients who underwent TSA in an outpatient or ambulatory setting were included. All nonclinical and deidentified database studies were excluded. Bias assessment was conducted with the methodologic index for nonrandomized studies criteria.
RESULTS RESULTS
Seven studies describing outcomes in outpatient TSA were identified for inclusion. The included studies used varying criteria for selecting patients for an outpatient procedure. The total outpatient 90-day complication rate (commonly including hematomas, wound issues, and nerve palsies) ranged from 7.1%-11.5%. Readmission rates ranged from 0%-3.7%, and emergency and urgent care visits ranged from 2.4%-16.1%. Patient-reported outcomes improved significantly after outpatient TSA in all studies. Two studies found a higher complication rate in the comparative inpatient cohort (
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Outpatient TSA in properly selected patients results in a similar complication rate to inpatient TSA. Further studies are needed to aid in determining proper risk stratification to direct patients to inpatient or outpatient shoulder arthroplasty.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34136848
doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.11.005
pii: S2666-6383(21)00005-0
pmc: PMC8178605
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

413-423

Informations de copyright

© 2021 The Authors.

Références

JBJS Rev. 2016 Dec 27;4(12):
pubmed: 28060788
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Jan;24(1):24-30
pubmed: 25168345
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 May;29(5):898-905
pubmed: 31831281
ANZ J Surg. 2003 Sep;73(9):712-6
pubmed: 12956787
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Jun;29(6):1115-1120
pubmed: 32035819
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2018 Oct;47(10):
pubmed: 30481235
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jun;473(6):2099-105
pubmed: 25524429
Orthopedics. 2018 Jul 1;41(4):e563-e568
pubmed: 29813169
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Dec 21;93(24):2249-54
pubmed: 22258770
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Jan;28(1):65-70
pubmed: 30100176
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020 Jul 1;28(13):e580-e585
pubmed: 31663914
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Mar;468(3):717-22
pubmed: 19626383
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Aug;32(8):2325-2331
pubmed: 28390881
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Apr;33(4):1265-1274
pubmed: 29224990
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jun;473(6):1860-7
pubmed: 25758376
JSES Open Access. 2018 Feb 15;2(1):13-17
pubmed: 30675561
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Feb 5;96(3):e17
pubmed: 24500589
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Oct 16;101(20):1845-1851
pubmed: 31626009
HSS J. 2011 Feb;7(1):9-15
pubmed: 22294952
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Feb;26(2):204-208
pubmed: 27592373
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Feb;455:183-9
pubmed: 16980898
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Jul;35(7):1941-1949
pubmed: 32192837
Bone Joint J. 2015 Oct;97-B(10):1385-9
pubmed: 26430014
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011 Jun;20(4):557-63
pubmed: 21324715
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020 Oct 1;28(19):795-801
pubmed: 31834035
Arthroscopy. 2019 Sep;35(9):2545-2550.e1
pubmed: 31421959
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Apr;29(4):856-60
pubmed: 23927910
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 May;24(5):754-9
pubmed: 25591461
J Arthroplasty. 2006 Sep;21(6 Suppl 2):132-8
pubmed: 16950075
JAMA. 2012 Sep 26;308(12):1227-36
pubmed: 23011713
JAMA. 2011 Apr 20;305(15):1560-7
pubmed: 21505134
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Dec;23(12):1852-1859
pubmed: 25156959
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Jun;28(6S):S118-S123
pubmed: 31133407
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2014 Apr;43(4):166-72
pubmed: 24730001
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2018 Oct 23;2(10):e064
pubmed: 30656252

Auteurs

Hailey P Huddleston (HP)

Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.

Nabil Mehta (N)

Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.

Evan M Polce (EM)

Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.

Brady T Williams (BT)

Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.

Michael C Fu (MC)

Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.

Adam B Yanke (AB)

Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.

Nikhil N Verma (NN)

Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.

Classifications MeSH