Ticagrelor versus prasugrel in acute coronary syndrome: sex-specific analysis from the RENAMI Registry.
Journal
Minerva cardiology and angiology
ISSN: 2724-5772
Titre abrégé: Minerva Cardiol Angiol
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101776555
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2021
Aug 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
18
6
2021
medline:
23
9
2021
entrez:
17
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The use of potent P2Y12 inhibitors (ticagrelor & prasugrel) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) is a class I recommendation. We performed a sex-specific analysis comparing the difference in efficacy and safety outcomes between ticagrelor and prasugrel in a real-world ACS population. Data from the multicenter REgistry of New Antiplatelets in patients with Myocardial Infarction (RENAMI) for 4424 ACS patients who underwent PCI and were treated with ticagrelor or prasugrel between 2012 to 2016 were analyzed. Mean follow-up was 17±9 months. After propensity score matching, there was no significant difference in the occurrence of primary endpoint of net adverse cardiac events between ticagrelor and prasugrel in men (HR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.69-1.29; P=0.71), or women (HR: 1.17; 95% CI: 0.63-2.20; P=0.62; P interaction [sex] = 0.40). Similarly, no differences were found in the occurrence of any of the secondary endpoints (MACE, all cause death, re-infarction, stent thrombosis, BARC major bleeding and BARC any bleeding) between the two P2Y12 groups between men and women. In this real-world ACS population, no relative difference in efficacy or safety outcomes were found between ticagrelor and prasugrel between sexes.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The use of potent P2Y12 inhibitors (ticagrelor & prasugrel) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) is a class I recommendation. We performed a sex-specific analysis comparing the difference in efficacy and safety outcomes between ticagrelor and prasugrel in a real-world ACS population.
METHODS
METHODS
Data from the multicenter REgistry of New Antiplatelets in patients with Myocardial Infarction (RENAMI) for 4424 ACS patients who underwent PCI and were treated with ticagrelor or prasugrel between 2012 to 2016 were analyzed. Mean follow-up was 17±9 months.
RESULTS
RESULTS
After propensity score matching, there was no significant difference in the occurrence of primary endpoint of net adverse cardiac events between ticagrelor and prasugrel in men (HR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.69-1.29; P=0.71), or women (HR: 1.17; 95% CI: 0.63-2.20; P=0.62; P interaction [sex] = 0.40). Similarly, no differences were found in the occurrence of any of the secondary endpoints (MACE, all cause death, re-infarction, stent thrombosis, BARC major bleeding and BARC any bleeding) between the two P2Y12 groups between men and women.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
In this real-world ACS population, no relative difference in efficacy or safety outcomes were found between ticagrelor and prasugrel between sexes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34137238
pii: S2724-5683.21.05591-5
doi: 10.23736/S2724-5683.21.05591-5
doi:
Substances chimiques
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
0
Prasugrel Hydrochloride
G89JQ59I13
Ticagrelor
GLH0314RVC
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM