History of contact with the SARS-COV-2 virus and the sense of coherence in the development of psychological distress in the occupational health professionals in Spain.
Adult
Anxiety
/ epidemiology
COVID-19
/ epidemiology
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Health Personnel
/ psychology
Humans
Male
Mental Health
/ statistics & numerical data
Middle Aged
Occupational Health
/ statistics & numerical data
Pandemics
Psychological Distress
SARS-CoV-2
/ pathogenicity
Sense of Coherence
Spain
/ epidemiology
Stress, Psychological
/ epidemiology
Surveys and Questionnaires
COVID-19
Occupational practice
occupational health professionals
psychological distress
sense of coherence
Journal
Science progress
ISSN: 2047-7163
Titre abrégé: Sci Prog
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0411361
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
entrez:
17
6
2021
pubmed:
18
6
2021
medline:
8
7
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The COVID-19 pandemic has affected the psychological well-being of healthcare professionals, among them, on medical and nursing occupational specialists. This study describes the psychological distress that this group has suffered, analyzing the effect that the sense of coherence related with the history of contact with infected people has generated in their mental health. Cross-sectional descriptive study using online questionnaires. Data were collected on a sample of 499 subjects, representing 42.0% and 38.8% of the associations of specialists in Occupational Medicine and Nursing, respectively. A univariate data analysis, independence test, and the CHAID multivariate method were carried out. The percentage of workers with high psychological distress was higher among women than among men; this was also higher in public sector workers than in the private sector. No differences have been observed regarding psychological distress and educational level, coexistence, having children, working away from home, having a pet, or between being a physician or nurse. The most efficient measure to prevent psychological distress was acting regarding the comprehensibility dimension of the sense of coherence. Sex, contact with any infected person, age, living as a couple, working in public or private centers, the availability of diagnostic tests, and the correlation with the manageability dimension were modulating factors. Sense of coherence is an effective measure to prevent psychological distress due to contact with people affected by COVID-19 in Occupational Health professionals.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34137643
doi: 10.1177/00368504211026121
pmc: PMC10454955
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
368504211026121Références
CMAJ. 2003 May 13;168(10):1245-51
pubmed: 12743065
Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Jul;38(7):1530-1531
pubmed: 32336584
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 26;17(9):
pubmed: 32357424
Forsch Komplementmed. 2014;21(3):154-62
pubmed: 25060154
Midwifery. 2019 Oct;77:9-15
pubmed: 31233991
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Mar;7(3):e14
pubmed: 32035030
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 19;17(6):
pubmed: 32204411
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;7(4):e15-e16
pubmed: 32085839
J Adv Nurs. 2019 Nov;75(11):2766-2772
pubmed: 31236952
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 02;17(11):
pubmed: 32498401
Med Clin (Barc). 2007 Apr 7;128(13):486-92
pubmed: 17419910
Expert Rev Neurother. 2020 Apr;20(4):351-371
pubmed: 32178540
Health Psychol. 2009 Jan;28(1):91-100
pubmed: 19210022
Qual Life Res. 2018 Feb;27(2):455-465
pubmed: 29124498
BMJ. 2019 Aug 13;366:l4828
pubmed: 31409609
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2020 Jul 10;22(8):43
pubmed: 32651717
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2020 May 1;46(3):229-230
pubmed: 32356896
J Psychosom Res. 1999 Apr;46(4):343-8
pubmed: 10340233
Occup Med (Lond). 2020 Jul 17;70(5):300-305
pubmed: 32476022
J Health Psychol. 2021 Jan;26(1):12-25
pubmed: 31674211
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Sep;291:113190
pubmed: 32563745
Brain Behav Immun. 2020 Aug;88:901-907
pubmed: 32437915
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2015;22(4):713-7
pubmed: 26706984
Prev Chronic Dis. 2020 Jul 16;17:E63
pubmed: 32678061
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 27;18(7):
pubmed: 33801740
Psychol Med. 1997 Jan;27(1):191-7
pubmed: 9122299
Saf Sci. 2021 Jan;133:105033
pubmed: 33046949
Psychol Trauma. 2020 Jul;12(5):550-552
pubmed: 32538657
Saf Sci. 2021 Jan;133:104996
pubmed: 32952305
J Nurs Manag. 2019 Nov;27(8):1620-1630
pubmed: 31444895
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 14;10(9):e039711
pubmed: 32928867
Occup Environ Med. 2020 May;77(5):281-282
pubmed: 32238444
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Sep 5;20(1):436
pubmed: 32891124
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Mar;7(3):228-229
pubmed: 32032543
Brain Behav. 2020 Nov;10(11):e01837
pubmed: 32918403
JAMA. 2020 May 19;323(19):1915-1923
pubmed: 32275295