Risk of Thyroid Cancer Associated with Use of Liraglutide and Other Antidiabetic Drugs in a US Commercially Insured Population.
administrative claims
glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist
intention-to-treat
time-on-drug
type 2 diabetes
Journal
Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy
ISSN: 1178-7007
Titre abrégé: Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101515585
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
10
02
2021
accepted:
22
05
2021
entrez:
18
6
2021
pubmed:
19
6
2021
medline:
19
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Quantify association between the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist liraglutide and risk of thyroid cancer (TC) compared to other antidiabetics. Initiators of liraglutide, exenatide, metformin, pioglitazone or groups of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors or sulfonylureas were identified in a US health plan (2010-2014) and followed for a median of 17 months. Thyroid cancer cases during follow-up were identified via a validated algorithm. Incidence rates of TC among liraglutide and comparators were assessed using relative risks estimated within propensity score-matched cohorts using intention to treat (ITT) and time on drug analyses. Latency effects and potential surveillance bias were evaluated. Relative risks from ITT analyses ranged from 1.00 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56-1.79) versus metformin to 1.70 (95% CI 1.03-2.81) versus all comparators excluding exenatide. Effect estimates from latency analyses were slightly attenuated. Time on drug analyses suggested no increased risk for either longer duration or higher cumulative dose of liraglutide. Medical record review found 85% were papillary or a follicular variant of papillary or both; 46% were microcarcinomas (≤10 millimeters), which were more prevalent in the liraglutide cohort (67% versus 43% in all comparators). Relative risks were elevated for several comparisons, which should be interpreted cautiously because of potential residual confounding and surveillance bias. Liraglutide cases had smaller thyroid nodules and shorter time-to-diagnosis, suggesting increased surveillance for TC among liraglutide initiators, especially shortly after the drug´s approval. After adjusting the primary analyses (ITT) for latency, no significant elevated risk of TC was observed among liraglutide initiators.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Quantify association between the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist liraglutide and risk of thyroid cancer (TC) compared to other antidiabetics.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
METHODS
Initiators of liraglutide, exenatide, metformin, pioglitazone or groups of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors or sulfonylureas were identified in a US health plan (2010-2014) and followed for a median of 17 months. Thyroid cancer cases during follow-up were identified via a validated algorithm. Incidence rates of TC among liraglutide and comparators were assessed using relative risks estimated within propensity score-matched cohorts using intention to treat (ITT) and time on drug analyses. Latency effects and potential surveillance bias were evaluated.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Relative risks from ITT analyses ranged from 1.00 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56-1.79) versus metformin to 1.70 (95% CI 1.03-2.81) versus all comparators excluding exenatide. Effect estimates from latency analyses were slightly attenuated. Time on drug analyses suggested no increased risk for either longer duration or higher cumulative dose of liraglutide. Medical record review found 85% were papillary or a follicular variant of papillary or both; 46% were microcarcinomas (≤10 millimeters), which were more prevalent in the liraglutide cohort (67% versus 43% in all comparators).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Relative risks were elevated for several comparisons, which should be interpreted cautiously because of potential residual confounding and surveillance bias. Liraglutide cases had smaller thyroid nodules and shorter time-to-diagnosis, suggesting increased surveillance for TC among liraglutide initiators, especially shortly after the drug´s approval. After adjusting the primary analyses (ITT) for latency, no significant elevated risk of TC was observed among liraglutide initiators.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34140791
doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S305496
pii: 305496
pmc: PMC8203194
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
2619-2629Informations de copyright
© 2021 Funch et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
All Optum-affiliated researchers (Funch, Mortimer, Ziyadeh, Seeger, Zhou, Ng, Dore) received support from this contract. As part of this contract, Optum Epidemiology retains the right to publish all results. Funch, Ziyadeh, and Seeger were employed by Optum and hold stock/stock options in the parent company of Optum (UnitedHealth Group, Inc.). Seeger was also involved in a research contract with Boehringer-Ingelheim, during the conduct of the study. Dore was an employee and shareholder of UnitedHealth Group. Ross received payment from Novo Nordisk for case adjudication and for consulting services provided to Optum Epidemiology. He also reports that UBC Corp, which manages the safety monitoring for the Medullary Thyroid Cancer Consortium, pays him personal consultation fees for his time. Major-Pedersen, Bosch-Traberg, and Gydesen are employees of Novo Nordisk A/S. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.
Références
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2018 Nov 22;11:791-806
pubmed: 30538516
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Mar;95(9):e2893
pubmed: 26945379
Stat Med. 1998 Oct 15;17(19):2265-81
pubmed: 9802183
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 Mar;20(3):464-72
pubmed: 21266520
Exp Diabetes Res. 2012;2012:924168
pubmed: 22693487
Diabetes Care. 2013 Aug;36 Suppl 2:S245-52
pubmed: 23882053
Stat Med. 2011 May 20;30(11):1292-301
pubmed: 21337595
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008 Mar;17(3):297-305
pubmed: 18215000
Oncol Lett. 2016 Jul;12(1):734-740
pubmed: 27347209
J Clin Epidemiol. 1994 Feb;47(2):165-71
pubmed: 8113825
Thyroid. 2015 Jun;25(6):567-610
pubmed: 25810047
N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 18;375(7):614-7
pubmed: 27532827
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2012 Apr;14 Suppl 2:33-40
pubmed: 22405267
Endocr Pract. 2011 Nov-Dec;17(6):957-9
pubmed: 22193147
Cancer. 2015 Jun 1;121(11):1793-9
pubmed: 25712809
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012 Nov;98(2):271-84
pubmed: 23010561
BMJ Open. 2012 Jun 08;2(3):
pubmed: 22685218
Endocrinology. 2010 Apr;151(4):1473-86
pubmed: 20203154
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012 Jan;97(1):121-31
pubmed: 22031513
Head Neck. 2014 Apr;36(4):564-70
pubmed: 23780707
Am J Epidemiol. 1995 Nov 15;142(10):1103-12
pubmed: 7485055
Am J Epidemiol. 2003 Nov 1;158(9):915-20
pubmed: 14585769
Diabetes Care. 2013 Aug;36 Suppl 2:S180-9
pubmed: 23882044
Diabetologia. 2012 Apr;55(4):948-58
pubmed: 22120574
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jul 28;375(4):311-22
pubmed: 27295427
Epidemiology. 2009 Jul;20(4):512-22
pubmed: 19487948
Gastroenterology. 2011 Jul;141(1):150-6
pubmed: 21334333
Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2015 Dec;2(4):221-228
pubmed: 26954351
Med Care. 2007 Oct;45(10 Supl 2):S143-8
pubmed: 17909373
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 May 5;17(1):330
pubmed: 28476125
Diabetes Care. 2020 Jun;43(6):1326-1335
pubmed: 32295809
Biometrics. 1996 Mar;52(1):249-64
pubmed: 8934595