How are patients with chronic urticaria interested in using information and communication technologies to guide their healthcare? A UCARE study.
Chronic urticaria
Information and communication technologies
Internet
WhatsApp
e-mail
Journal
The World Allergy Organization journal
ISSN: 1939-4551
Titre abrégé: World Allergy Organ J
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101481283
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2021
Jun 2021
Historique:
received:
07
01
2021
revised:
26
03
2021
accepted:
09
04
2021
entrez:
18
6
2021
pubmed:
19
6
2021
medline:
19
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Patients with chronic urticaria (CU) are increasingly using information and communication technologies (ICTs) to manage their health. What CU patients expect from ICTs and which ICTs they prefer remains unknown. We assessed why CU patients use ICTs, which ones they prefer, and what drives their expectations and choices. In this cross-sectional study, 1841 patients across 17 countries were recruited at UCAREs (Urticaria Centers of Reference and Excellence). Patients with CU who were >12 years old completed a 23-item questionnaire. Most patients were interested in receiving disease information (87.3%), asking physicians about CU (84.1%), and communicating with other patients through ICTs (65.6%). For receiving disease information, patients preferred one-to-one and one-to-many ICTs, especially web browsers. One-to-one ICTs were also the ICTs of choice for asking physicians about urticaria and for communicating with other patients, and e-mail and WhatsApp were the preferred ICTs, respectively. Many-to-many ICTs such as Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, and Twitter were least preferred for all 3 purposes. Living in rural areas and higher education were linked to higher odds of being interested in receiving disease information, asking physicians, and communicating with patients through ICTs. Most patients and especially patients with higher education who live in rural areas are interested in using ICTs for their healthcare, but prefer different ICTs for different purposes, ie, web browsers for obtaining information, e-mail for asking physicians, and WhatsApp for communicating with other patients. Our findings may help to improve ICTs for CU.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Patients with chronic urticaria (CU) are increasingly using information and communication technologies (ICTs) to manage their health. What CU patients expect from ICTs and which ICTs they prefer remains unknown. We assessed why CU patients use ICTs, which ones they prefer, and what drives their expectations and choices.
METHODS
METHODS
In this cross-sectional study, 1841 patients across 17 countries were recruited at UCAREs (Urticaria Centers of Reference and Excellence). Patients with CU who were >12 years old completed a 23-item questionnaire.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Most patients were interested in receiving disease information (87.3%), asking physicians about CU (84.1%), and communicating with other patients through ICTs (65.6%). For receiving disease information, patients preferred one-to-one and one-to-many ICTs, especially web browsers. One-to-one ICTs were also the ICTs of choice for asking physicians about urticaria and for communicating with other patients, and e-mail and WhatsApp were the preferred ICTs, respectively. Many-to-many ICTs such as Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, and Twitter were least preferred for all 3 purposes. Living in rural areas and higher education were linked to higher odds of being interested in receiving disease information, asking physicians, and communicating with patients through ICTs.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Most patients and especially patients with higher education who live in rural areas are interested in using ICTs for their healthcare, but prefer different ICTs for different purposes, ie, web browsers for obtaining information, e-mail for asking physicians, and WhatsApp for communicating with other patients. Our findings may help to improve ICTs for CU.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34141048
doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2021.100542
pii: S1939-4551(21)00036-3
pmc: PMC8190491
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100542Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Author(s).
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
I Cherrez-Ojeda has no conflicts of interest. E Vanegas has no conflicts of interest. A Cherrez has no conflicts of interest. M Felix has no conflicts of interest. K Weller is or recently was a speaker and/or advisor for, and/or has received research funding from: Biocryst, CSL Behring, Dr. Pfleger, FAES, Moxie, Novartis, Shire/Takeda, and Uriach. M Magerl is or recently was a speaker and/or advisor for, and/or has received research funding from Biocryst, CSL Behring, Kalvista Pharmaceuticals, Moxie, Novartis, Pharming, and Shire/Takeda. RR Maurer has no conflicts of interest. VL Mata has no conflicts of interest. A Kasperska-Zajac has no conflicts of interest. A Sikora has no conflicts of interest. D Fomina is or recently was a speaker and/or advisor for, and/or has received research funding from: AstraZeneca, CSL Behring, Glaxo SmithKline, MSD, Novartis, Sanofi, and Shire/Takeda. E Kovalkova has no conflicts of interest. K Godse has no conflicts of interest. N Dheeraj Rao has no conflicts of interest. M Khoshkhui has no conflicts of interest. S Rastgoo has no conflicts of interest. RFJ Criado has no conflicts of interest. M Abuzakouk has no conflicts of interest. D Grandon has no conflicts of interest. MBA van Doorn is or recently was a speaker and/or advisor for, and/or has received research funding from Abbvie, BMS, Celgene, Janssen Cilag, LEO Pharma, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sanofi-Genzyme. S Valle has no conflicts of interest. E Magalhães de Souza Lima has no conflicts of interest. SF Thomsen is or recently was a speaker and/or advisor for, and/or has received research funding from: Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sanofi, and UCB. GD Ramón has no conflicts of interest. EE Matos Benavides has no conflicts of interest. A Bauer is or recently was a speaker and/or advisor for, and/or has received research funding from Novartis, Sanofi, Genentech, Leo Pharma and Shire/Takeda. Ana M Giménez-Arnau has held roles as a Medical Advisor for Sanofi, Uriach, Genentech, Novartis, Amgen , ThemoFisher, Roche, Almirall, and has research grants supported by Instituto Carlos III- FEDER, Novartis, and Uriach; she also participates in educational activities for Almirall, Genentech, Glaxo SmithKline, LEO Pharma, Menarini, MSD, Novartis, Sanofi, Avene and Uriach. E Kocatürk is or recently was a speaker and/or advisor for Bayer, Novartis, and Sanofi. C Guillet has no conflicts of interest. JI Larco is or recently was a speaker and/or advisor for: FAES, Novartis, and Sanofi. Z-T Zhao has no conflicts of interest. M Makris is or recently was a speaker and/or advisor for, and/or has received research funding from AstraZeneca, Chiesi, Glaxo SmithKline, Novartis, and Sanofi. C Ritchie has no conflicts of interest. P Xepapadak reports personal fees from Galenica Greece, Glaxo SmithKline, Nestle, Novartis, Nutricia, and Uriach, outside the submitted work. LF Ensina is or recently was a speaker and/or advisor for, and/or has received research funding from Novartis, Sanofi, and Takeda. S Cherrez has no conflicts of interest. M Maurer is or recently was a speaker and/or advisor for, and/or has received research funding from: Allakos, Alnylam, Aralez, AstraZeneca, Biocryst, Blueprint, CSL Behring, FAES, Genentech, Kalvista Pharmaceuticals, LEO Pharma, Menarini, Moxie, MSD, Novartis, Pharming, Pharvaris, Roche, Sanofi, Shire/Takeda, UCB, and Uriach.
Références
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2012 May;10(5):341-7
pubmed: 22111985
Chest. 2007 Nov;132(5):1624-30
pubmed: 17998362
Clin Exp Dermatol. 2010 Dec;35(8):869-73
pubmed: 20456386
Telemed J E Health. 2009 Jul-Aug;15(6):600-10
pubmed: 19534591
Allergy. 2017 Dec;72(12):2005-2016
pubmed: 28543019
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Jul 10;12:67
pubmed: 22781312
Allergy. 2016 Aug;71(8):1210-8
pubmed: 27038243
Interact J Med Res. 2017 Jul 21;6(2):e11
pubmed: 28733273
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Mar;8(3):1074-1082
pubmed: 31751760
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Mar 14;16(3):e79
pubmed: 24642014
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Apr 23;15(4):e85
pubmed: 23615206
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Feb 20;20(2):e50
pubmed: 29463492
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Aug;80(2):266-73
pubmed: 19914022
Int J Occup Environ Health. 2017 Apr;23(2):160-171
pubmed: 29460697
J Healthc Inf Manag. 2005 Spring;19(2):81-6
pubmed: 15869217
Allergy. 2011 Mar;66(3):317-30
pubmed: 21083565
Adv Soc Work. 2010 Spring;11(2):67-81
pubmed: 21691444
Allergy. 2020 Feb;75(2):423-432
pubmed: 31494963
Allergy. 2018 Jul;73(7):1393-1414
pubmed: 29336054
Postgrad Med J. 2009 Sep;85(1007):455-9
pubmed: 19734511
Eur J Dermatol. 2020 Jun 1;30(3):259-266
pubmed: 32666926
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2020 Mar 12;13:259-269
pubmed: 32214821
World Allergy Organ J. 2020 Oct 30;13(11):100475
pubmed: 33204387
ERJ Open Res. 2017 Jul 12;3(3):
pubmed: 28717641
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2016;231:82-90
pubmed: 27782019
J Med Syst. 2012 Feb;36(1):241-77
pubmed: 20703721
Int J Telemed Appl. 2020 Jan 23;2020:2489890
pubmed: 32411213
Libyan J Med. 2016 Nov 16;11:32679
pubmed: 27855773
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2019 Jul 24;12:583-590
pubmed: 31413585