Correlation between age, coronal and sagittal parameters and spine flexibility in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Spine flexibility
adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
radiographic parameters
surgical planning
Journal
Spine deformity
ISSN: 2212-1358
Titre abrégé: Spine Deform
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101603979
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2021
11 2021
Historique:
received:
10
12
2020
accepted:
06
06
2021
pubmed:
19
6
2021
medline:
20
11
2021
entrez:
18
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To investigate the correlation between spine flexibility and age, skeletal maturity, coronal and sagittal parameters for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). All AIS patients evaluated for surgery were included. Following parameters were obtained: age, gender, skeletal maturity (Risser and Sanders), Cobb angle at high thoracic (HT), mean thoracic (MT) and thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) level, flexibility of HT, MT and TL/L curves, coronal and sagittal parameters. A multivariate diagnostic through the Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient ([Formula: see text]) was performed. Data from 200 patients were obtained (30 males, age 15 ± 1.9 years). No significant correlation was found between curve flexibility and age or gender. A negative correlation was observed between flexibility of MT curves and magnitude of HT ([Formula: see text] = - 0.4) and MT curves ([Formula: see text] = - 0.4). A weak correlation among curve flexibility at different levels was observed: the flexibility of HT curves correlated with the flexibility of MT and TL/L curves, and the flexibility of MT curves correlated with flexibility TL/L curves. A negative correlation between flexibility of MT curves and AVT-T (thoracic apical vertebral translation) ([Formula: see text] = - 0.2) was evidenced. No correlations between flexibility and sagittal parameters were observed. No strong correlation were observed between curve flexibility and age or skeletal maturity. A negative correlation between curve magnitude and flexibility at thoracic level was demonstrated. Furthermore, a weak positive correlation between flexibility of PT, MT and TL/L curves was observed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34142365
doi: 10.1007/s43390-021-00373-9
pii: 10.1007/s43390-021-00373-9
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1525-1531Informations de copyright
© 2021. Scoliosis Research Society.
Références
Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J et al (2001) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Jt Surg Am Vol 83(8):1169–1181
doi: 10.2106/00004623-200108000-00006
Trobisch PD, Ducoffe AR, Lonner BS et al (2013) Choosing fusion levels in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 21(9):519–528. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-21-09-519
doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-21-09-519
pubmed: 23996983
Baroncini A, Migliorini F, Trobisch PD (2020) Non-fusion anterior scoliosis correction (ASC) positively influences sagittal parameters. 27th International Meeting on Advanced Spine Techniques, April, Athens, Greece, Athens.
Hamzaoglu A, Talu U, Tezer M et al (2005) Assessment of curve flexibility in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 30(14):1637–1642. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000170580.92177.d2
doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000170580.92177.d2
pubmed: 16025034
Deviren V, Berven S, Kleinstueck F et al (2002) Predictors of flexibility and pain patterns in thoracolumbar and lumbar idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 27(21):2346–2349. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200211010-00007
doi: 10.1097/00007632-200211010-00007
pubmed: 12438982
Eyvazov K, Samartzis D, Cheung JPY (2017) The association of lumbar curve magnitude and spinal range of motion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 18(1):51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1423-6
doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1423-6
pubmed: 28143455
pmcid: 5282845
da Costa BR, Cevallos M, Altman DG et al (2011) Uses and misuses of the STROBE statement: bibliographic study. BMJ Open 1(1):e000048. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2010-000048
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2010-000048
pubmed: 22021739
pmcid: 3191404
Baroncini A, Trobisch PD, Migliorini F (2020) Learning curve for vertebral body tethering: analysis on 90 consecutive patients. Spine Deformity. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-020-00191-5
doi: 10.1007/s43390-020-00191-5
pubmed: 32827085
Ameri E, Behtash H, Mobini B et al (2015) Predictors of curve flexibility in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a retrospective study of 100 patients. Acta Med Iran 53(3):182–185
pubmed: 25796026
Fujiwara A, Lim TH, An HS et al (2000) The effect of disc degeneration and facet joint osteoarthritis on the segmental flexibility of the lumbar spine. Spine 25(23):3036–3044. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012010-00011
doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012010-00011
pubmed: 11145815
Bao H, Zhu F, Liu Z et al (2014) Coronal curvature and spinal imbalance in degenerative lumbar scoliosis: disc degeneration is associated. Spine 39(24):E1441–E1447. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000603
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000603
pubmed: 25202936
Tsutsui S, Yoshimura N, Watanuki A et al (2013) Risk factors and natural history of de novo degenerative lumbar scoliosis in a community-based cohort: The Miyama Study. Spine deformity 1(4):287–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2013.05.005
doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2013.05.005
pubmed: 27927360
Trobisch PD, Kobbe P, Baroncini A (2019) Die dynamische Skoliosekorrektur als Therapieoption bei adoleszenter idiopathischer Skoliose (Dynamic scoliosis correction as alternative treatment for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a non-fusion surgical technique). Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und Unfallchirurgie. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0983-1265
doi: 10.1055/a-0983-1265
pubmed: 31533170
Stokes IAF (2008) Mechanical modulation of spinal growth and progression of adolescent scoliosis. Stud Health Technol Inform 135:75–83
pubmed: 18401082
Burwell RG (2003) Aetiology of idiopathic scoliosis: current concepts. Pediatr Rehabil 6(3–4):137–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/13638490310001642757
doi: 10.1080/13638490310001642757
pubmed: 14713582
Gervais J, Périé D, Parent S et al (2012) MRI signal distribution within the intervertebral disc as a biomarker of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and spondylolisthesis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 13:239. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-13-239
doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-239
pubmed: 23206365
pmcid: 3551775
Chevrefils C, Périé D, Parent S et al (2018) To distinguish flexible and rigid lumbar curve from MRI texture analysis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a feasibility study. J Magn Reson Imaging JMRI 48(1):178–187. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25926
doi: 10.1002/jmri.25926
pubmed: 29281150
Watanabe K, Ohashi M, Hirano T et al (2018) The influence of lumbar muscle volume on curve progression after skeletal maturity in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a long-term follow-up study. Spine Deform 6(6):691-698.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2018.04.003
doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2018.04.003
pubmed: 30348345
Yao G, Cheung JPY, Shigematsu H et al (2017) Characterization and predictive value of segmental curve flexibility in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients. Spine 42(21):1622–1628. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002046
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002046
pubmed: 27997505