Method-specific beliefs and subsequent contraceptive method choice: Results from a longitudinal study in urban and rural Kenya.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
30
10
2020
accepted:
26
05
2021
entrez:
18
6
2021
pubmed:
19
6
2021
medline:
11
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Evidence from sub-Saharan Africa, including Kenya, shows that negative beliefs about contraceptive methods are associated with non-use. However, little is known about the relationship between contraceptive beliefs and subsequent method choice. We used data from a two-year longitudinal survey of married women aged 15-39 years at enrollment from one urban site (Nairobi) and one rural site (Homa Bay) in Kenya. Analysis entails descriptive statistics and estimation of a conditional logit analysis to examine associations between method-specific beliefs and choice of injectables, implants or pills among women who were not using any method or were pregnant at baseline (round 1) but adopted these methods at 12-month follow-up (Nairobi, n = 221; Homa Bay n = 197). Beliefs about pills, injectables and implants among non-users were generally negative. With the partial exception of the pill in Nairobi, the majority thought that each method was likely to cause serious health problems, unpleasant side effects, menstrual disruption, and would be unsafe for long-term use. In both sites, satisfied past use of a method and the perception that a method is easy to use had a major influence on method choice. Concerns about menstrual disruption and safety for long-term use were unimportant in both sites. There were some marked differences between the two sites. Beliefs about long-term fertility impairment and perceived husband approval had strong influences on choice of injectables, implants or pills in the urban site but not in the rural site. The relative importance of beliefs, some erroneous, in predisposing women to choose one method over another appears to be conditioned by the social context. There is need for family planning counseling programmes to pay attention to erroneous beliefs and misconceptions about contraceptives.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34143804
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252977
pii: PONE-D-20-34145
pmc: PMC8213138
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0252977Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Reprod Health. 2018 May 8;15(1):75
pubmed: 29739429
Demography. 1997 Aug;34(3):369-83
pubmed: 9275246
J Biosoc Sci. 2019 Jul;51(4):491-504
pubmed: 30309402
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012 Sep;44(3):194-200
pubmed: 22958664
Int Q Community Health Educ. 2017 Jan;37(2):79-91
pubmed: 28056643
Stud Fam Plann. 2003 Sep;34(3):149-59
pubmed: 14558318
Fam Plann Perspect. 1999 Jul-Aug;31(4):168-75
pubmed: 10435215
BMC Womens Health. 2016 Jul 12;16:35
pubmed: 27405374
Stud Fam Plann. 1997 Dec;28(4):290-307
pubmed: 9431650
Reprod Health. 2017 Feb 9;14(1):23
pubmed: 28183308
Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2015 Dec;41(4):191-9
pubmed: 26871727
Afr J Reprod Health. 2010 Dec;14(4 Spec no.):98-109
pubmed: 21812203
Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2013 Sep;39(3):133-41
pubmed: 24135045
Contracept X. 2020 Jun 20;2:100030
pubmed: 32642642
BMC Womens Health. 2014 Feb 13;14(1):28
pubmed: 24524562
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jul;213(1):46.e1-46.e6
pubmed: 25644443
Reprod Health. 2014 Dec 10;11:85
pubmed: 25495334
Afr J Reprod Health. 2013 Sep;17(3):79-90
pubmed: 24069770
Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2007 Sep;33(3):117-23
pubmed: 17938094
Reprod Health. 2015 Apr 12;12:32
pubmed: 25890234
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2018 Oct 4;6(3):603-610
pubmed: 30287535
Reprod Health. 2009 Feb 19;6:3
pubmed: 19228420
Reprod Health. 2018 Jun 26;15(1):114
pubmed: 29940996
East Afr Med J. 1996 Oct;73(10):651-9
pubmed: 8997845
Health Commun. 1999;11(1):1-19
pubmed: 16370967
J Biosoc Sci. 2020 Oct 23;:1-13
pubmed: 33092660
Demography. 2002 Nov;39(4):713-38
pubmed: 12471851